1. It is different because the citizens want some type of reassurance or unity that the country is taking measures to prevent such an attack to not happen again. Yet with so many issues and concerns, there’s bound to be those who haven’t experienced the tragedy who can’t sympathize but only worry about how this could affect their rights and privacy. This war has to take a different strategy, which is putting up more countermeasures but also having access to information from citizens to prevent such danger. Which is why it is controversial because discrimination can happen so easily while trying to protect another.
  2. It seems to violate the fourth amendment because police already have the power to search houses but can’t do it without a warrant. Yet for Roving Wiretaps it access more information that could be used for minor crimes. Meaning more privacy would be dive in to but not enough cause to determine if that’s okay. Which the fourth amendment protects from unreasonable searches. Without anyone to supervise this broader search it makes people uneasy that the government is too involved.
  3. It also violates the Fourth Amendment because it is not the immediate notice of searching anyone’s home and property. This yet again raises tensions between freedom rights and citizens. Unfortunately, because of the tragedy, the countermeasures are questioned, but everyone has a right to do so not everyone is the same.

Leave a Reply