- Ruth Gilmore says that capitalism will stop being racial capitalism, when all the white people disappear from the story. What’s the connection between “whiteness” and racism, do you think? 2:51
The connection between whiteness and racism is the fact that there would be no racism or capitalism if there are no white people.history of those who owned the means of production had a different eye view then the people who they hired for the labor to be exploited, that we can recognize today as racial practices. Like Gilmore describes capitalism requires inequality between a certain different types of groups, while the racism insures it preserves and uphold the standards. All capitalism is a relation not a thing. Capitalism is racial from the beginning it has developed in history , it’s constantly reproducing itself and continue to depend on racial practice or the racial hierarchy we place people in. You can’t undo racism if you can’t undo capitalism. I like the connection was trying to make was that if all the white people disappeared from the story, it’s the whiteness would be the structure position of power they hold. This was to separate and organize who is to harm and always to protect and to sort out the individual levels of value within a person. That is to say that whiteness is a part of a structure that allows racism to function. It’s not just an identity or attitude or the way somebody feels. History if you were to be a royal, you were to have better resources whether it was food, medical or even social resources, unlike a poor person or a farmer who doesn’t have as much as a wealthy or person at the to of a hierarchy. If you truly want to understand how something works, you must learn and be committed to give all the attention without issues. Racism does not exist if we have no whites, because it started racial when people least expected it to mean, Gilmore mentions race means black people, not race is the white people.
2. Gilmore makes the point that criminals are actually being created by the criminal justice and prison system (she says “the category of ‘criminal person’ can be perpetuated”). According to Gilmore, how does that happen, how does the prison system create new “criminals“? Do you agree with her view? 8:23
The criminal justice system does not respond to crime it produces the category of what a criminal person is. That’s how the prison system creates criminals.With a constant stream of criminals that are grouped and labeled as criminals, because they have a constant cycle of going back to prison. That number gets bigger over time and deeper when ether the sentencing being longer or the bad behaviors that count as a crime need to grow too. Harsh laws have to be put into place. Those who are eligible to get out of the prison system and go back home or as others say entry into their community is how the category describes a criminal and it’s the basic model of the prison industry complex. The way the system is designed and maintained over time to need a constant fluctuation of people, it can be policies and laws that keep people inside the system. Lastly once you are a criminal it stays on your record, something you can carry for decades. Systemically harming people of a better chance in life. Gilmore says it can perpetuate itself because there are criminals that are eligible to go back home and to have their freedom and to live within the means of their community and to be apart of the community. At a certain extent being incarcerated leaves less chance of employment, stability, safety, organization entry. Instead of ending harm, we have a system that reproduces harm for a certain group. I can say I agree because crime is not simply an individual choice at times there are individuals who choose to acknowledge they are doing something wrong and still commit a crime. Then you have others who are a product of their environment, whether it’s socially or economically from conditions, and the prison systems make these conditions worse not better so in regards to a group of people, we categorized as criminals. They will never have their freedom, whether they are inside the prison system or outside within their community. Leading to self destruction instead of rehabilitation.
3. Describe how your understand what Prof. Gilmore – in the last part of her video – calls “liberation struggle”? 9:28
As she describes the size or scale of struggle differs widely in certain places very specifically to the where, with many dimension. She uses liberation struggle to describe the efforts to change conditions that make prisons, cruel and unjust treatment or a level of control necessary.
From my understanding, Gilmore describes liberation struggle as ongoing. It’s an effort to change the conditions that makes imprisonment possible, not only opposing prisons, but changing the world that depends on a prison system that contributes to control and fear in an environment, not focusing on our bad people and the list of behaviors that are bad, but on a system that is bad, working together overtime to build new ways of living not just sticking to the old systemic ways. Building spaces that make freedom possible and tangible. that we collectively have an ongoing effort to transform in a social and economic conditions that only produce racism and imprisonment. The level of hierarchy and the category that we choose to place people must change, we must actively build societies that help within the people of the communities and the people that make the community what it is. Housing , healthcare, community resources. Gilmore says liberation isn’t only one single thing, it is continuously and large that are in many places and material conditions .It must meet a well structured action plan to. Like when she describes a place based struggle in Amadora where houses where built Privately and socially. We may call them public housing as we are taught , but people within the community have built over decades so some may call it informal settlement or self built housing. Theses are communities that have people who have lived there for years basically there home. Resources that have been used and may be at threat of losing both. This does not happen all at once its over time, so people but learn and come together to build alternatives. I am for these people we must create conditions that are beneficial, where people can live with freedom and understand or know to know what is creating harm and punishment necessary at first, but also building care and support disability creating local networks and organizations of people coming together And some may not agree and Some may not feel the need to say anything, but they still show up to collectively give a helping hand on change. And I feel when people organize and come together to change the system and find concrete ways to make a change around them and not only for them but for other places and other People,