Israt Kaniz Nipa
1. P. Williams writes that the “war on terror” is a new type of war. What’s new about it, and how is it different from traditional wars?
I think the “war on terror” is different because it’s not like the old wars where two countries fight on a battlefield. This kind of war doesn’t really have clear enemies or borders. It’s more about fighting ideas, hidden networks, and people who could be anywhere. What’s new about it is how much it relies on technology, intelligence, and constant surveillance instead of face-to-face combat. It feels like a war that never really ends since the goal isn’t just to win territory but to prevent attacks before they happen.
2. In what ways does the “Roving Wiretaps” of the Patriot Act seem to violate the Bill of Rights? Which amendment(s) does it seem to violate and why?
The “Roving Wiretaps” part of the Patriot Act seems to go against the Fourth Amendment, which protects us from unreasonable searches. Normally, the government needs a specific warrant for each device or location. But roving wiretaps let them follow someone across phones or computers without getting new approval every time. That kind of power can make people feel like they’re being watched even if they haven’t done anything wrong. It’s understandable for national security, but it also raises big questions about privacy.
3. What about “Sneak and Peek” Warrants?
“Sneak and Peek” warrants also connect to privacy concerns. They let officers enter a person’s home and search through their things without telling them right away. The idea is to avoid tipping off suspects, but it still feels invasive. It kind of crosses the line of what the Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect. Even if it helps catch criminals, it makes people worry about how much control the government has over personal space.
