Journal Entry – Week 7

6 posts

Instructions

Respond to at least 1 prompt on this page (you are welcome to respond to more). For instructions on how to submit a journal entry, please follow these instructions. FORMATTING FOR THIS WEEK: Use the title format “[FirstName] [LastName] W7” and select the Category “Journal Entry – Week 7”

Prompt 1

Many of the films we saw this week show stereotypical versions of the enemy. Watch “Bust the Axis”, made in the UK directed by an American and “Momotarō no Umiwashi”. How is the enemy portrayed in each of these films? What negative stereotypes are depicted? What means are used in terms of drawing style and movement? What are the behaviors demonstrated by the characters?

Prompt 2

The Private Snafu series was designed to instruct GIs in military techniques and behaviors. How do you think Private Snafu – Fighting Tools uses humor to get the point across? Does it use voice, drawing, movement or story? How?

Prompt 1

In “Bust the Axis” (UK/US, 1943) and “Momotarō no Umiwashi” (“Momotaro’s Sea Eagles,” Japan, 1943) the animation dehumanizes the enemy. It makes them look like bumbling fools, still dangerous enough to fight but weak enough to beat. The animation is exaggerated with crazy stereotypes, they mock cultures to create a big distinction between “us” and them.

In “Bust the Axis” (UK/US, 1943) the enemy is Hitler, Mussolini and Hirohito. They are portrayed is idiots. The Axis is almost incompetent and just bad at theres jobs, they animate them courtly running away at times. Stereotypically Hirohito has some crazy racist East Asian facial features (squinted eyes, buck teeth, glasses). They made Hitter crazy and his mustache hilarious and Hirohito as way too fat. They animate the enemy as laughable and cowardice. They are easily beaten and lack any form of dignity. Their animation wile simple it’s just mean to the enemy. They look and act stupid.

In “Momotarō no Umiwashi” (“Momotaro’s Sea Eagles,” Japan, 1943) the enemy is American and the British but at times it means like it’s really just the west. They are depicted of twisted demons with great technology that they only use for even. They are drawn as animals (bears and bluebirds). Stereotypically their Western characteristics consist of big heavy builds and big nosed. They act like animals who are lazy or drunk. The animators make them very ugly with dark color pallets, they also make them also incompetent. They are never ready for an attack, They are arrogant and un coordinated and just like Bust the Axis” (UK/US, 1943) they are depicted as very weak.

Arianny Gallardo-W7

The Private Snafu series was designed to instruct GIs in military techniques and behaviors. How do you think Private Snafu – Fighting Tools uses humor to get the point across? Does it use voice, drawing, movement or story? How?

The short film make it seems like it uses humor with silly animation, clumsy mistakes, and a sarcastic narrator. Snafu’s weapons don’t work because he doesn’t take care of them, and the animation makes his failures look ridiculous. The narrator jokes about his mistakes, making the lesson easy to understand. It’s a fun way to remind soldiers to take care of their gear.

Nate Ragland W7 Prompt 2

Private Snafu – Fighting Tools uses humor in a few different ways to get its point across, mainly through voice, drawing, movement, and story. The exaggerated, sarcastic narration mocks Snafu’s mistakes, making the lesson more memorable while keeping it entertaining. The animation itself is cartoonish and over-the-top, with Snafu’s clueless expressions and dramatic failures adding to the comedy. Slapstick plays a big role too with his carelessness with his weapons leads to exaggerated mishaps. The story follows a simple but effective setup: Snafu neglects his weapons, and when the time comes to use them, they fail him completely.

 

Journal Entry – Week 7

Many of the films we saw this week show stereotypical versions of the enemy. Watch “Bust the Axis”, made in the UK directed by an American and “Momotarō no Umiwashi”. How is the enemy portrayed in each of these films? What negative stereotypes are depicted? What means are used in terms of drawing style and movement? What are the behaviors demonstrated by the characters?

Both war cartoons rely on some pretty obvious enemy stereotypes. “Bust the Axis” makes fun of the Axis powers with over-the-top caricatures, the Germans with those pointy helmets, Italians with huge noses, and Japanese characters with really racist features like buck teeth and yellow skin. They move all jerky and clumsy, portrayed as cowardly losers. Meanwhile, “Momotarō no Umiwashi” does the same thing to Westerners, giving them massive noses and stiff movements, showing Americans and Brits as corrupt colonizers who get easily beaten by the graceful, honorable Japanese characters. The animation styles really hammer home these differences – with heavier lines and darker colors for villains in the American film, and sharp, angular features for the Western bad guys in the Japanese one. Classic propaganda techniques from both sides.