Michelle Rodriguez Discussion Post # 8

How has your perspective changed since the beginning of the class? It hasn’t. The readings were interesting and better defined and helped me to understand terms that I have come across more and more lately, such as cisgender, intersectionality, queer, and so on and so forth.

What will you take away from the course? Through communication we can achieve so much. We must listen to each other as well as talk to each other and take each other into consideration. Only then will it be possible to make the changes we need.

How did the format of the class affect your learning and your motivation? Personally, I find that I enjoy a classroom setting over an online setting. If I have a question, its much easier in a classroom to get an immediate answer as opposed to online. I found that my motivation remained the same, though with the current state of affairs and having been quarantined, working from home initially allowed me the freedom to spend more time on schoolwork. Since the “city” has begun reopening and business has picked up, I found myself falling a bit behind.

Michelle Rodriguez Institutional Artifact

Family–parent/child communication

Everything begins at home. All that a child learns, such as love, hate, how to treat others, morals, etc., begins with their initial surroundings and begins as soon as they leave the womb. How to play, talk, walk, laugh cry, etc.

I believe we need to stop promoting this notion that a “normal/traditional” family consists of a mother, father and siblings because that is just not the case in every “family”. You put multiple people in a room from different ethnicities, backgrounds, etc. and ask them their definition of what a family consists of and there will be many variations as everyone identifies and defines family differently. We have witnessed that time and again with the many family sitcoms on tv, such as Modern Family, Growing Pains, Married With Children, Full House, and even in cartoon shows such as Family Guy, American Dad, etc. Each person has their own idea of family and one type of family shouldn’t discredit another for their dynamics nor should their be a “standard” to which a family is held against. For example, a child with two mothers would see their family as “normal” as would a child who has “two dads” and who would we be to say that it’s not? As is the case in the show Modern Family. Not only does it consist of a gay family, but an interracial and blended marriage with children, which is representative of different family dynamics all over. Growing Pains, mentioned above, though would fall in the category of a more “traditional” family, it was representative of a certain kind of family and they attempted to tackle issues relevant to them at their times. Family Guy is a cartoon family, and a little more in “tune” with today’s issues and puts a crude comedic spin on the issues facing us today, though they can be offensive about it. The point is the world is ever changing and we need to continue change right along with it. We need to make those who haven’t felt comfortable ever, because of the unfair standards society imposes, feel comfortable with who they are, how they chose to identify and how they chose to show the world, because everyone is needed in order to have a functioning and productive society.

In order to have a productive society, we need to begin with communication. Communication is one of the best weapons we have and we have the ability to use it at our disposal yet we use it so infrequently. Communication in any relationship is important, but one of the most important relationships is a child with their parents/family. Children should be able to talk to and go to their family about anything, such as, issues at school, issues with a family member, bullying, to talk about their feelings, sex, and so on and so forth. Children need and should be able to feel safe and comfortable at home. On the other hand, children also need to be taught to be accepting of others despite appearance, skin color, gender, etc. and that not one person or group of people, regardless of gender, sexual identity, health, disability, etc., is better than the other. And all should be treated equally. By ignoring the existence of different groups of people doesn’t make the disappear but it does do a great disservice to the child and to the group of people being “ignored.”

Once a child knows they are able to go to an adult, regardless if it is their mother, father, aunt, uncle, etc., about any issue they may be having, whether it is bullying, just to talk, school, etc., they will most always do so. When children feel heard, appreciated, accepted, etc., they will continue to keep the lines of communication open. Just having the ability to be able to go to someone may be a great deterrent to something bad. Not everyone has someone they can lean on and that can have lasting and detrimental effects.

Communication also works in correcting inappropriate behaviors. though most behavior is initially learned at home, children, as they grow, venture out of the house and learn on their own as well. Sometimes they are exposed to behaviors that are unbecoming of a fellow human being and that’s where we must step in and correct the behavior and explain what was wrong and explain the appropriate remedy.

There are books that aid in all types of discussions to have with children that help teach about gender, race, bodies, sex (not necessarily intercourse), trans, etc. and are broken down into age groups. Books geared towards younger children may contain pictures that better help the child understand while books geared to older children go into much more detail about different subjects which would help further what they should have begun to learn in their early years.

Teaching children that people are people should be the first thing we as humans should be doing because what matters most is the person you are, how you treat your own family, others around you along with any contributions you may or may not make to your family and eventually to society. A person’s skin color doesn’t define a person. It is part of a person’s makeup, but not something that should be used against someone. And shouldn’t that be what you should be teaching them? Shouldn’t we be teaching our children not to judge others based on based on their looks, how they are dressed, their occupation, their nationality, etc. so they grow into adults who are decent human beings that would think twice about judging someone based on outward appearances and further who know that there are many different types of people in the world, and each person may or may not fall in to more than one “category” but that not one person is better than the other and we all deserve respect regardless of our circumstances, education, health, etc. We should all be learning about each other rather than relegating everyone to their own separate corners and categories. I’d like to think that we are on the right track to achieving equality amongst everyone, but we still have a ways to go.

Michelle Rodriguez Journal Post #7

When we have a society that is able to talk freely about sex without it being this taboo topic we may see a decrease in people’s reactions to it and to how others express themselves. Whether it be the physical act of sex or someone “performing” their gender. Though “performing” their gender wouldn’t be used to describe a ‘white, heterosexual male’ so why should it be applied to those who don’t fit the man-made gender binary put in place to divide society in to one of either category while ignoring many people across many backgrounds, nationalities, etc.?

Sex should be something that is enjoyed by all who is engaging and engaging freely. And reading the article about having a safe word regardless of the encounter made much sense in the regard that a person is able to end an encounter without having to answer questions or make up excuses for why the encounter should end and would give those courage who would be afraid otherwise. And regardless if you consented in the beginning, once you no longer consent, the “encounter” should immediately grind to a halt.

Michelle Rodriguez Discussion Post #7

My apologies for the late post!

For the Institutional Artifact I’d like to analyze is Family and more specifically parent/child communication within a family. I believe everything begins at home and all that a child learns, such as love, hate, how to treat others, morals, etc., begins with their initial surroundings.

First off, I believe we need to stop promoting this notion that a “normal/traditional” family consists of a mother, father and siblings because that is just not the case in every “family”. Each person has their own idea of family and one type of family shouldn’t discredit another nor should their be a “standard” to which a family is held against. A child with two mothers would see their family as “normal” as would a child who has “two dads” and who would we be to say that it’s not? The world is ever changing and we need to continue change right along with it.

That leads me to the parent (family)/child communication. Communication in any relationship is important, but one of the most important relationships is a child with their parents/family. Children should be able to talk to and go to their family about anything, such as, issues at school, issues with a family member, bullying, to talk about their feelings, sex, and so on and so forth. Children need and should be able to feel safe and comfortable at home. On the other hand, children also need to be taught to be accepting of others despite appearance, skin color, gender, etc. Children need to be taught that not one person or group of people, regardless of gender, sexual identity, health, disability, etc., is better than the other. And all should be treated equally.

I have always taught my sons people are people, because that’s how I see it. And sometimes I am actually not sure if that is a good thing, which I’ll get to why in my next paragraph. I am the first to admit I don’t know much about my heritage, culture, etc., so there wasn’t much in that department for me to pass on to my sons. And knowing so little about my own heritage guaranteed that I knew even less about the many other people, cultures, backgrounds, etc. that are out there, but the one thing I knew and always felt was that that shouldn’t matter in helping to decide whether or not their a good person, criminal, straight, gay, black, white, Hispanic, etc. What matters is the person you are, how you treat your own family and others around you along with any contributions you may or may not make to your family and eventually to society. As long as you teach your children And that is what should be seen first.

As I said above, sometimes I am actually not sure if teaching children that people are people is necessarily a good thing. One day while scrolling through Facebook a high school friend of mine had updated her status to read “if you’re teaching your children not to see color, then you’re part of the problem.” Her post wasn’t open for comments as she felt she didn’t need to “explain it any further.” But it left me feeling perplexed and because I really don’t understand. I am one that taught my sons not to see color. And I mean it in the sense of a person’s skin color should be the first thing you see. A person’s skin color doesn’t define a person. It is part of a person’s makeup, but not something that should be used against someone. And shouldn’t that be what you should be teaching them? Shouldn’t we be teaching our children not to judge others based on based on their looks, how they are dressed, their occupation, their nationality, etc. so they grow into adults who are decent human beings? At least when it would come to judging someone.

Which brings me back to my initial statement on family. I believe children should be taught from a young age that there are many different types of people in the world, and each person may or may not fall in to more than one “category” but that not one person is better than the other and we all deserve respect regardless of our circumstances, education, health, etc.

Michelle Rodriguez Reading Journal #5

Reading the article “Cisgender Privilege…” made me understand my “privilege” in the fact that I don’t have to worry about going outside and being attacked for liking someone of the opposite gender. I can walk freely down the streets holding my partners hand without fear of any repercussions yet there are people out there who because they love differently, or live differently or express themselves differently who are attacked for doing exactly that. It is actually pretty disgusting that this world is full of people who feel superior to others because they are different. Reading the NYT article “Civil Rights Law Protects Gay and Transgender Workers, Supreme Court Rules” restored my faith (a little) and demonstrated that we have the ability to be human and civil to one another and that we recognize that the way things are is wrong. How a person dresses, identifies, loves, etc. has nothing to do with their work ethic, productivity, etc. and again cisgender people don’t face these hurdles so why should anyone of the LGBTQ community face them?

Michelle Rodriguez Discussion Post #6

Reading the article by Julia Johnson just further demonstrates the many layers in any and every situation, including how we identify ourselves and each other. When we judge a book by it’s cover that is where we make our initial mistake. We shouldn’t label someone based on our beliefs and teachings without giving that person the chance to tell you who they are and how they would like to be addressed. Not everyone fits into one specific mold and when you try to define someone based on your own “beliefs” you disregard that person and their feelings completely.

Watching the interview with CeCe McDonald then watching the documentary Free CeCe about her life just shows us that we have much more to do in achieving equality for all despite skin color, gender, gender identity, sexual identity, etc. CeCe not only faced bias against her because she was black but because she was trans. Again, I cant help but think what does either have to do with the other and what does it have to do with her as a person? It is saddening that she endured what she went through for living her truth and because someone either didn’t understand or didn’t want to understand attacked her. It was unfortunate for the “aggressor”  that the result of her standing up for herself resulted in the aggressor’s death, but had she not, who knows if she would’ve been the one whos life would’ve ended that night as it has happened. It was even more disgusting that she was treated the way she was while in the criminal justice system. Beginning with putting her in a male prison when clearly she belonged in a women’s prison, but because people the trans women are just men in a dress and thy are acting, she was not put where she actually belonged. Then she was in solitary confinement for her “safety.” This is something that “cisgender” people don’t have to worry about. And eufortunately this is nothing new and despite the calls for reforms, it seems as if we are still right where we started. The fact that Cece felt she needed to take a plea deal where she essentially admitted being guilty to murder out of fear that going to trial to prove her innocence could possibly land her in jail forever is evidence that we have a long way to go in prison reform as well as this is something that would not have happened had Cece been a white, cisgender male. It was refreshing to see CeCe take a terrible situation and instead of letting it tear her down, and she definitely could’ve let it break her, but she turned it into a learning experience and is now out there advocating for people like herself, using the strongest weapon she possesses: her voice. Hopefully with people like her out on the front lines continuing to fight for equal rights for all, we will eventually see the change we need.

Michelle Rodriguez Journal Post # 4

I see privileges as a sort of guarantee for something. And some people have more privileges than others beginning with the color of their skin. It is a sad shame that someone’s skin color can be determining factor in how they are treated, in whether or not they get a job/promotion. But it has and still does exist. And unfortunately until everyone agrees that it racism is a problem, the problem will continue to exist.

The articles also made me rethink the “people are people” line because although it is true, we are all people, lumping everyone into one exclusive category erases what makes up each person, their plight, and therefore makes the statement untrue and unfair to everyone as well all have our each unique story.

 

Michelle Discussion Post #5–Final Portfolio

After reading the articles and watching the videos and though I kind of already knew, it just helped me realize that I am privileged and my privilege begins with my the ability to have a “choice”–the ability to choose to go to school to learn, to learn to read and write, having access to internet, the ability to work, to buy food, drive a car and so many other things we can do and have access to demonstrates our privilege. And being of the same race didn’t necessarily guarantee you to the same privileges or even any privileges at all.

As I read I kept relating it to the present state of affairs and which sadly has been going on for many, many years. Men, women and children who have a different skin color shouldn’t fear any type of interaction with police officers and definitely shouldn’t fear losing their lives solely based on their skin color. And the fact that this was once an issue and that it remains an issue is something I find very hard to believe and understand. Regardless of what I’ve read, what documentaries I have watched, etc. I fail to see what someone’s skin color has anything to do with getting a job, being respected, being accepted, being treated as a human! I’d like to think people are people but after reading the article on systemic privilege and microaggressions I realize such a statement dismisses the plight of those to whom some things just doesn’t come as easily as it does for others, such as, the basic right to not be immediately judged based on the color of your skin, which, like I said I don’t believe has anything to do with anything.

I remember one year  my best friend and I decided to go on vacation to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina for a week. During our vacation and while we were doing some thrift store shopping a Caucasian woman, for absolutely no reason, says to us”oh my, you guys all look alike.” The statement stopped us in our tracks as we were confused because we have no familial relation, which really was pretty obvious. We definitely look absolutely nothing alike, so the only other reason we could think of that she would be making such a statement was because we were Hispanic. I couldn’t believe she even had the audacity to say it to begin with.  So I asked her what she meant as I was offended and I didn’t hide it. She attempted to make light of the situation, I’m assuming because I confronted her, and made a feeble attempt at a joke I can’t remember laughing dismissively before letting her know that all Hispanics do not look alike and that her comment was totally unnecessary and uncalled for and if there ever is a next time, she should keep her comments to herself. Then walked away, not giving her a chance to respond. And now more than ever we need to call people out for their blatant racism and ignorance and let them know that it is uncalled for and will no longer be tolerated. There are too many people of different cultures, race, gender, etc. for one to be superior over another.

Which would bring me to how I would help combat microaggressions would be to continue to get educated and then enter the field of social work so that I would be able to educate others.

Michelle Rodriguez Discussion Post #4

In keeping with the article the Identity Terms I would use to identify myself would be Latina/Hispanic, though those are the terms I use when filling out official paperwork. Usually when I am asked my response is Puerto Rican and Italian, because my father is Puerto Rican and my mother is Italian. I am also American because I was born here.

I am cisgender and use the pronouns she/her and if I had to “classify” my sexuality I would say you love who you love would just about sum it up for me. Though unless I’m looking to date you, this information isn’t something I find to be of importance to anyone.

The theory I chose in Critical work on language and the philosophy of language was “Sex Marking.” In short, I believe this section was explaining that there is too emphasis is placed on gender when there doesn’t need to be, and especially when it doesn’t make a difference to know to begin with. And doing so just reinforces the “male dominance” we are trying to get away from. I found the attached chart and demonstrates how we can refer to the same thing without having to “gender” it, therefore including everyone.

The Top 25 Job Titles That Still Use the Word "Man" | Ongig Blog

The second column is the same as the first column–removing “man” therefore encompasses all people and removes any assumptions that the person holding the position is a “man.”

Michelle Rodriguez Gender & Identity Project

I know based on biological reasons and in keeping with the binary we are taught, I am female. I was born with a vagina, breasts and all my “lady parts” and further I do identify as a female which therefore makes me a cisgender woman. I wholly believe people should be able to express themselves, their gender and identity how they each see fit and without the backlash of those who either don’t understand or those who don’t want to understand one another.

As i’ve stated previously, I grew up with my dad, stepmother, two sisters, one brother and a stepsister. Eventually my stepmother became pregnant with and had my half brother,  many years later. My father is Puerto Rican and my mother is Italian but besides knowing what my nationality is, I did not, until recently, know much about my roots/heritage or about Puerto Rican culture with the exception of eating the food and hearing the language spoken over the years between family members. But even my knowledge on the food of my “people” is superficial at best. And I don’t speak the language, despite my father speaking it.

Growing up with my father also  meant not knowing much of my mother’s family so needless to say I knew less about my Italian culture. My family on my biological mother’s side didn’t really take the time to get to know us. My “grandparents” did not accept my father because of his nationality/race therefore and unfortunately for them, they never got to know us and subsequently our children. And all for what? As recently as ten years ago they got in touch with us and have tried to “make up for lost time” if there even is such a thing. If it wasn’t for social media, some who have reached out in the most recent years probably would not have otherwise. I guess better late than never?

Growing up and ever since I can remember whether or not we were male or female didn’t make a difference to my father. If he needed help whoever was around or closest to him was who he called on. My sisters and I were not “safe” just because we were girls.  My father tried his best to treat us all the same. Part of me believes it is because he was a guy and so teaching teenage girls how to be “young women” wasn’t his strong suit. But he did his best. My stepmother tried, but she was thrust into a situation the she herself wasn’t ready for and at her young age it definitely was more than she expected. So it wasn’t hard to notice the “resentment” at times. That resentment subsided as we got older and ventured of on our own. Further, and for reasons I’ve stated in other posts, my father felt we should learn all we could about anything and everything because the more we knew, the more we didn’t have to depend on anyone but ourselves. If anything, our independence was what was most important to him. All throughout my childhood through to today my father still says to me “you do not need a man.” And he is completely right. We do not need anyone, whether it is a man or woman, as we all are and should be capable of handling any situation we are put in.

My father also always taught us to enjoy life, go to school get a career, get our life together and then if we want to get married and have children, but not a second before. My father placed a great deal of emphasis on us going to school and working. Having our own family was something he considered a plus, not something we had to do and therefore it wasn’t something he “looked” forward too. He looked forward to us becoming something and making something of ourselves. As I was allowed the freedom to make and learn from my own mistakes, choices I made throughout my life didn’t necessarily take the preferred path of my father. But life isn’t always set in stone so there’s bound to be deviations. And he never made me feel bad about my decisions.

Growing up my siblings and I went to public school here in NYC, which included grade school, middle school and high school so we were always around all different types of people, from different races, different walks of life, gay, straight, etc. Some are even in my family. So I don’t know nor understand what it is to hate and/or dislike others for reasons such as the color of their skin, their religion, sexual orientation, disability, and so on and so forth. I don’t understand how some people feel superior to others based on those same reasons as well. People are people and should always be treated as such. We grew up in a house where we were taught to treat everyone with respect regardless of status, job occupation, skin color, etc., as you may never know when you may be in a similar situation or if you may ever need said person.

I didn’t grow up in a very religious household either. We weren’t a family that went every Sunday to church and listened to the word of God, though there is a universal belief that there is a God. But that is something we are taught and are passed down throughout the family. My family felt that we didn’t need to attend church to show our faith. But as of late I have really just been questioning who is to say if there really is God? Certainly everyone has their right to believe he exists. And certainly they all are able to worship whom they please just as those also have a choice not to worship for whatever reason. I just think a God that sets guidelines which details what makes a person acceptable or not, is not really a good example for the people, and therefore why should we give “Him” any credibility?