Posts due tonight 6/4

This is a reminder that by 11:59 pm tonight you should post your comments on discussion 2, reading journal 3 over the two assigned readings, and discussion 3 posts.

After reading your journal and discussion 2 posts, I wanted to make a few notes. It is clear that you all are learning to grapple with new terms and concepts, or the reframing of concept you had understood differently. It is really great reading your writing processing the assigned texts with your experiences. I loved your identity diagrams and the ways you wrote about them. I was also happy to see that it was a useful exercise for you all. As Jhulio wrote, “it is incredible how a simple diagram can help you be more conscious of the many ways you identify yourself and how things you do help others define your sex and gender.” I couldn’t agree more. Taking the time to write it out makes a difference! Just one benefit of writing across the curriculum and WI courses.

Before going much further, I want to take a moment to acknowledge what is happening in our world and to invite you to write about it in comments on this post. Some of you brought up the current protests in your writing – THANK YOU. If we were in class I would bring this up and we would take time processing together. That might be a little harder here, but I want to open it up for you to share your thoughts, feelings, experiences related to systemic racism, police brutality, and social protest. It is really important that we pay attention, employ media literacy skills, and support one another in solidarity right now (and always). And, as I hope you are learning, feminism and gender studies are intersectional (at least the way we are studying it). So issues of race are feminist issues. Issues of police brutality are feminist issues.

A few additional notes. I want to underscore that western society is built on a gender binary that we created. In many non-western and indigenous cultures, gender was always treated as more fluid. In some cultures, those who embraced more than one gender are/were also considered to be connected to the spiritual world and important community members. However, through settler-colonial practices, much of the globe has been forced to adopt a binary. The western world also created a racial binary. Lydia X. Z. Brown notes:

“Both gender and race are, in part, socially constructed. They are also rooted in certain lived experiences separate from abstract concepts, but there are significant differences. Gender can be shaped, often intensely, by culture. The contemporary underpinnings of the gender binary itself are rooted in imperial colonialism, where the white saviorist civilizing mission included enforcing patriarchal and restrictive gender roles onto Black, brown, Asian, and indigenous peoples’ societies wherein gender roles often spanned multiple categories and allocations of labor—including in Filipinx culture. Yet race, unlike gender, is tied to intergenerational and biological histories.” (Full Article Here)

I think this is useful to remember as we discuss intersectional identities. It is also useful to know the difference between race and ethnicity – though to be sure both are socially constructed. Race is about phenotypes – or physical characteristics like skin color and hair texture. Ethnicity is linked to cultural expression and identification. So, for example, being Indian is an ethnicity, though certainly within Indian culture, there is a lot of ethnic variation (Punjabi, Bengali, Tamil, to name a few).  However, “Asian” or “South Asian” is a race that often includes ethnic groups such as Indian, Thai, Filipinx, Laotian, etc. Of course, all of these are constructed and all serve to divide, but they also unite individuals around shared identity and can be important when pointing out systemic disparity. In New York, because we are such a global city, we seem to understand that not all people who are black are African American and that not all people who are Latinx or Hispanic are “Mexican,” as the current president often suggests, but have a range of nationalities and ethnicities. In this way, New Yorkers are aware of this difference, even if we can’t always explain it.

Next, I want to ask you to be sure that you don’t conflate gender and sexuality. Gender is how you identify and express and sexuality is who you desire in terms of physical attraction and romantic attraction. People often assume that all lesbians are masculine and all gay men are feminine. In this sentence, you can see I’m using terms related to gender (masculine and feminine) and terms related to BOTH sexuality and gender (lesbian and gay man). Many people confuse these because part of the dominant concept of gender is that men are sexually attracted to women and women are sexually attracted to men. When one is a man who is attracted to other men (or woman attracted to women) that is sexuality, but it also disrupts our traditional understandings of gender because we are taught a “real” man or woman is heterosexual.

MANY people cannot think outside of the gender binary. This is largely because of how society is structured and everything tells us you go in one of two boxes. They say there are only two genders. This statement erases the lived experience of many people around the world. Some may believe there are two genders, but reality does not support that. We also think there are two sexes, but that is also a construction. Sex is a combination of morphology (what you see), hormones, and chromosomes, and these things change throughout our life. When one is assigned a sex at birth, the doctors are only using morphology, or what they can see, and not examining the entire picture.

Last lecture-y note, one of you brought up the Bechdel test (it autocorrected to beachfront test in the post so I wanted to clarify). I wanted to share a video or two about the test. It is amazing that most movies still don’t pass it! Here is a video about the test from 2009:

And here is a link to the Bechdel Test movie list that people (like you!) can add to.

Announcements for 6/2

I have had the opportunity to skim your journal entries and discussion posts this morning and it is nice to see you grappling with material that is difficult. I want to go back through your posts more carefully today to look at your great diagrams and clearly address questions/clarify issues that came up in your posts. I will create a video and/or notes to send out to you by tomorrow.

But I do want to preview what is on the agenda for the next few days.

  1. There are TWO readings on the schedule. Please do them both and get started on them early so you can complete them with time to process before writing journals and discussion posts.
  2. There are also two videos listed on the schedule that I would also like you to watch. Reflect on gender and bodies as you do. They are relatively short and together should be about 5 minutes. Your big work this period is to read.
  3. Write journal 3 and discussion 3 by Thursday 6/4 at 11:59 pm, and reply to at least three of your peers’ discussion 2 posts.
  4. Your Gender Identity Project draft is approaching soon. Review the assignment and the sample papers included. If you have questions, please start or contribute to a conversation in the discussion forum.

Guidelines: Discussion 3 due 6/4 at 11:59 pm

Please do BOTH of the readings for this section and watch the two videos on the schedule.

Make four columns on a piece of paper. In the first column, write down three body parts/ways of being. For example, you could list things like legs, nose, hair, and/or you could list things like how I talk, my walk, etc. No judgment, just list.

In the second column, list ALL of your feelings related to each of the items in column one.  Step away for a few minutes.

In the third column, look at the first and second columns, and try to determine where you got the messages that contributed to your feelings/beliefs about your body. Write them down and share them in the post.

Lastly, in the fourth column, go back through some of the theories you read for today and choose at least two that you think relate. Explain this.

You can share your chart in the post if you wish, or you can choose to write about it instead. Once you have done all of the exercises with the chart answer the following questions: In what ways does your embodied communication comply with the command performance? Are there any ways you have refused a command performance? How would you explain your embodied communication using theories from the texts?

Announcements for 5/29-6/1

Hi All – I was very pleased with your writing and how open you all were. It was a pleasure to read. You may have noticed there are some unlinked items in the course schedule. I like to get a feel for who is in the course before I decide on all the readings. I will be making updates, but not for the next due date.

Most of your stories made me really want to share my own stories. That’s a sign of a good story! But this is about you finding your stories, not me. I wanted to make a couple of notes about things that have come up.

JOURNALS: most of you did the discussion post, but some of you did not to the journal. Please do both. They are similar but not the same and I addressed that in the discussion forum this morning. If you are confused, please read that response. Also, a number of you referenced the readings as “Dan P. McAdams, Ruthellen, Josselson, & Amia Lieblich, Identity and Story.” I don’t know where you got that. The reading is from Gender Stories: Negotiating Identity in a Binary World by Karen Foss and Mary E. Domenico. All of the readings have full citations at the bottom of the course schedule.

MASCULINE/FEMININE: We all use these words a lot. Sometimes we say girly, “like a man,” “acted like a girl/boy,” etc. This is because we have a whole host of behaviors that we associate with men and another we associate with women. In reality, we could simply substitute a description of the before; in other words, use words that are more accurate. So instead of saying that someone fixes things and likes sports is a more accurate description than saying something like “they like guy things.” I often ask “what are guy things” as a way to show that other words might be better. I want to challenge you to think about how your gendered descriptions might be more accurate if you described the actual behavior. Just think about it.

FUTURE-POSTING: I would like you to start future-posting your Discussion Posts. You do NOT need to do this for journals. Future-posting means that you will set the date on your post in advance. This way all of your posts will be published at the same time and, more like a class discussion, you can read the posts as a group, or conversation, and comment. I put details on future-posting in the prompt for Discussion 2. However, my colleague Syelle Graves wrote up a much nicer and neater set of instructions here.

CATEGORIES: Please do NOT use the “Category Sticky” on the right side when composing a post. Ignore that box completely. ONLY select yours from the actual “Categories” option. Here is a diagram for you:Where to choose category

For our next due date on June 1, 2020, at 11:59 pm, these are the tasks to complete:

  1. Comment on a minimum of three posts in Discussion 1.
  2. Read UNIT I: AN INTRODUCTION TO WOMEN, GENDER, SEXUALITY STUDIES: GROUNDING THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS AND CONCEPTS.  Please note that this reading is an online book and you must click through on the bottom right-hand corner to the next section. You should read ALL of Unit 1, clear up through “References: Unit 1.”
  3. Write Journal 2 reflecting on the reading.
  4. Review the information associated with and complete Discussion Post 2.

Also, I didn’t make another video announcement. I am happy to do them if you like them and find them helpful. Feel free to comment on this post to let me know what you think about that.

Guidelines: Discussion 2 due 6/1 at 11:59 pm

Now we are going to dive into more about your identity, but consider representing it in a visual format. Look at the four diagrams linked in the course schedule under “View &/or Listen.” Spend some time with each. Next, tell us which diagram you would use to explain gender to someone else and why.

Next, you are going to create a visual image of your identity. I suggest doing this AFTER you have read the assigned text. The purpose is not for you to recreate diagrams like those above, which are only mapping gender. The purpose is for you to think about all of your layers of identity and figure out how you would represent that visually. Your image should demonstrate the concept of intersectionality, both within oneself and within the class as a whole.  It also serves as an introduction to help develop your critical gender lens by identifying which concepts and/or identities are important to you.

Before you start making the image, set a timer and write on your own (don’t share here) a list of your personal, enacted, relational, and communal identities. From this list, create your image. You do not have to include the entire list. The image can be simply a series of connecting circles, each representing a social group you belong to with as many circles as you feel is appropriate. You can also let your drawn diagram take any form you wish. I have included examples from past classes hereTake a picture of your image and share it in your post.

Once you have drawn your diagram, select 2-3 groups on your drawing that you feel have most influenced who you are as a person, and how you see the world.  For each of these groups, write 2-3 values you feel you have as a result of these groups’ influences. Then, write 2-3 ways the values you noted may interfere with your ability to communicate with persons outside this group.  Note: values can be double-sided; for example, a value of ethnic pride can be a prejudice against other ethnic groups. Include this in your post.

Lastly, and I will post this in the announcements today too, I want to make a change to discussion posts so that we all comment in the same period and it feels more like a classroom discussion. To do this, I will ask you to future-date your posts so that everyone’s posts are available at the same time for commenting. One major advantage of this is that it will reinforce due dates to help keep you on track, while still allowing you to complete work in advance if you choose. Here are the steps.

After you write your post, on the right-hand side, chose “edit” next to “Publish”

Choose "edit" next to "publish immediately"

This will give you a drop-down menu where you can select the date/time you want it to publish on. For Discussion 2, that date should be June 1 at 11:59 pm (unless you are an early morning poster, then adjust accordingly). Select OK.

Drop Down Date Selection

Finally, choose the category for the post. Please note: DO NOT MAKE YOUR POST STICKY. Don’t even choose a category sticky. You can completely ignore that box. Only choose a regular category.

Select category, not category sticky

Then publish your post as usual. It won’t be visible on the site until the date you selected.

More details on posting, commenting…and don’t forget to join the course!

Today’s announcement will be text and image only – no video. Reminder: Journal 1 and Discussion 1 are due today (Thursday 5/28 at 11:59 pm)

First, if you have created your account, but not joined the course do so right away. You can do that by going to our course profile (there is also a link on the top-left side of the site) and click the add button below the avatar. Until you join the course, you won’t be able to post.

Second, a number of you have been commenting on the discussion posts that are already up. I am so glad that you are on top of this! I have to approve comments and generally, I will just do that. However, for the first few discussions, I am going to hold off on approving them until after the original posts are due. So I will approve current comments tomorrow morning during the start of the “commenting” period.

Lastly, I wanted to share this diagram for creating a post. You might remember that you create posts by going to the top of the site and clicking the + button. One important note is to select a category for your post NOT a category sticky. The stick categories will be used only by me so for guidelines so that those posts stay at the top of the page for everyone. Click the image below to enlarge.

Diagram of post elements

Answering Questions and Creating Posts

I received a number of questions via email and I attempted to answer them in this video:

It would be wonderful if we could have those discussions on OpenLab so that everyone can participate rather then me having one-on-one conversations with each of you. Please feel free to leave comments on this post if you have more questions.

I also created the following tutorial video on how to make posts, ask questions, add to our vocabulary list, and update your profile picture.

Finally, I am adding all videos I am making for this course to a YouTube Playlist. You can access all of the videos here.

Guidelines: Discussion 1 (due Th 5/28 at 11:59pm)

Watch the 8 videos in this playlist. They were all made by former Gender and Communication students (shared with their permission) and are examples of gender stories.

 In this discussion, introduce yourself to our learning community. After sharing a few factual details such as your major, etc. share a gender story or two of your own. We all have stories about our identity. Be sure to reference the readings and/or the videos in your post and follow the discussion guidelines.

Please format your post title “[First Name] [Last Name] Discussion 1”. If the name you use is different from the one on my roster, please use your preferred name in your post and contact me privately so I can note it in my records.

To post, go to the plus sign at the top of this site > type your title and the body of your post > choose the category “Discussion 1″ on the right > publish.

Guidelines: Institutional Artifact Project

Select a social institution of interest. For example family, education, sports, work, media, religion, technology (e.g. Internet), law, or the health field. 

Select an artifact or set of artifacts from this institution that you feel can be analyzed from a gendered perspective. 

An artifact must be something original from the social institution, such as a specific school’s curriculum, textbook, anti-bullying policy, a university’s guidelines for athletes, media advertisements, a movie or television sit-com, a selection from brochures or speech texts of religious groups, businesses’ policy statements on sexual harassment, businesses’ guidelines for promotion, laws on equal pay, rape, marriage, health care guidelines, health care advice, an advice book on family communication, parent/child communication, etc. 

To do a gendered analysis you will select relevant concepts from this course to apply in a close analysis of the artifact.  To do this you should describe the artifact and its context. From this description, you will identify and interpret the messages the artifact presents and explain how those messages serve to create, maintain, and/or change our understandings of gender. Lastly, theorize the possibilities that come to through your analysis by telling us what they mean.

Include 3 relevant concepts from the course.  Be sure to define your terms, rather than just name-drop.  Write a coherent essay that features your voice, not just a list of concept applications.  You will be asked to share your paper with the class.

Use proper MLA formatting and edit your paper to be free of writing errors. It should be 750 – 1000 words and posted to OpenLab on time. To submit your Institutional Artifact Paper,  go to the plus sign at the top of the site > type a title* and type the body of your post > choose the category “Institutional Artifact Project” on the right > publish.

*Please use the title format “[FirstName] [LastName] Institutional Artifact Project Draft” 

Check out some examples from previous semesters.

Guidelines: Discussions

In each discussion, you are expected to 1.) engage with the assigned texts in your own original posts and 2.) engage your classmates’ work by responding to their posts.  You will be given a writing prompt and/or activity to guide each discussion.

Discussion Posts are due twice weekly on Thursdays & Mondays by 11:59 pm. Response posts are due on the next due date following the original post’s due date. For example, if I share my original post on Thursday, May 28 by 11:59 pm, I should respond to at least THREE classmates’ original posts from that discussion by Monday, June 1 by 11:59 pm, and share my original post for the discussion due that day.

Original Discussion Posts should be:

  • 400-600 words, unless otherwise specified. Longer, but not shorter, posts are fine.
  • written in complete, well-formed sentences & carefully proofread
  • engaged with the assigned text by explicitly referring to and/or citing them
  • submitted by going to the plus sign at the top of the site > type a title* and type the body of your post > choose the category “Discussion __” with the corresponding number for the discussion on the right > publish.
  • *Please use the title format “[FirstName] [LastName] Discussion __” (insert corresponding discussion number)

Response Discussion Posts should be: 

  • a minimum of 3-4 complete sentences
  • written in complete, well-formed sentences & carefully proofread
  • engaged with the assigned text by explicitly referring to and/or citing them
  • submitted as a comment on the post of a classmate by selecting the title of the post > scroll down to where you leave a reply > type the comment > post comment.