- Both readings, it seems to me, explore social class influence people’s choices and their daily lives. People’s view of their social class is that whether or not they view themselves as middle class or working class are the main subject of reading 4.1. However, by connecting neighborhoods to different levels of income using the subway map, reading 4.2 gives a more basic representation of class. Reading 4.1 talks about identity and impression more than reading 4.2, which show real financial patterns and income gaps throughout New York City.
2.The station closest to where I live is in Brooklyn. My area would mostly be described as the median or low- income based on reading 4.1 because many people here rely on their incomes instead of wealth or large investments. Brooklyn is connected to a diverse mix of income levels, so I’m not surprised by this, but many families have regular jobs. Brooklyn is so diverse that is lacks simple grouping, even though I think it may be somewhat correct.
3. According to reading 4.2, the financial gap in NYC is clearly structured. Average salaries are lower such as the Bronx and parts of Queens, yet wealth resides in some places, particularly Manhattan. This shows that social class and location are related in New York City.
