1. The similarities and differences in how social class is discussed in readings 4.1 and 4.2.
    Both readings 4.1 and 4.2 explore the role of social class in shaping people’s lives, emphasizing how economic factors influence daily experiences and societal positioning. In both texts, social class is linked to income, education, and occupation, which collectively determine access to resources and opportunities. However, they approach the topic from different perspectives. The first reading examines social class through self-identification, explaining how individuals perceive their social standing based on personal achievements, financial stability, and professional status. It highlights how people’s understanding of their class position affects their sense of belonging and social mobility. The second reading, on the other hand, focuses on external markers of class, particularly through public transportation. It illustrates how wealthier individuals often have the means to avoid crowded and less efficient transit options. Meanwhile, lower-income individuals rely heavily on public transit, exposing them to longer commutes and additional daily challenges.
    2- Social class tends to live in your neighborhood. In Staten Island, having one or two cars is often more convenient, especially since public transportation like buses can be slower and less accessible compared to other boroughs. The layout of the island and the lack of a subway system can make it harder to rely on public transportation, so owning a car becomes a practical choice for many people. Based on the concepts from Reading 4.1, which talks about how social class is shaped by things like income, this is because many neighborhoods in Staten Island tend to have a mix of working-class families and middle-class people who rely on wages and may not have access to high levels of wealth or high-paying jobs.
    3- The general pattern of social classes in NYC, Reading 4.2 highlights a clear pattern of social class differences in NYC, particularly in access to and experiences with public transportation. Higher-income individuals often avoid crowded subway stations, opting instead for taxis, private cars, or other expensive transportation options. Their financial stability allows them to prioritize comfort and convenience, minimizing their reliance on public transit. In contrast, lower-income individuals depend heavily on the subway due to its affordability, despite facing longer commutes, overcrowding, and less maintained conditions. Additionally, subway stations in wealthier neighborhoods tend to be cleaner and less congested, while those in lower-income areas are often overcrowded and in need of maintenance. This pattern reflects broader social inequalities, where economic status determines the quality and accessibility of transportation. Wealthier individuals enjoy greater flexibility in mobility.

Leave a Reply