1. A Repressive State Apparatus (RSA) includes institutions that maintain control by enforcing rules and ensuring people adhere to the dominant ideologies in society. Althusser calls them “repressive” because they play a key role in keeping societal order. An example could be a school principal making sure all students follow the school rules and behave properly. The principal helps maintain order and ensures everyone follows the guidelines set by the school. It’s like a system that keeps things in check and running smoothly. 

2. Sure! Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs) are like different parts of society that shape how we think and act without us really noticing. They include things like schools, churches, TV, and even our families. These places teach us what’s “normal” and what to believe in. 

3. Repressive State Apparatuses and Ideological State Apparatuses are both ways society keeps things in order, but they do it differently. Repressive State Apparatuses, like the police or military, use force or the threat of force to make sure people follow the rules. They can arrest you or use physical power to keep control. Ideological State Apparatuses, on the other hand, work through ideas and culture. They include things like schools, media, churches, and families. These institutions shape how we think and what we believe is normal. Instead of using force, they influence our beliefs and values so that we follow the rules on our own.

4.

One thought on “Aliah Diaz- DB 3.2

  1. I was intrigued by the distinctions between the RSA functions and the ISA’s purpose. The “status quo” seems to have these concepts well thought out. As you mentioned in your response, ISAs play a crucial role in shaping our behavior through social institutions like family, churches, and the school system. Nowadays, our most advanced means of communication are social digital networks, which can spread various ideologies almost automatically. These platforms can also censor content and penalize users if their posts violate its policies.

    For instance, on Facebook, if your language or information sharing is deemed inappropriate, you could find yourself temporarily banned from the platform—what my friends and I refer to as “Facebook Jail.” This is a means of repression for 14 days, reinforcing that certain behaviors are not tolerated and serving as a warning of what could come next.

    Looking back at the early stages of indoctrination, the ability to control one’s mind through social entities is quite remarkable—though in an alarming way. They understand that children’s minds are the most impressionable when they are young. The best way to ensure conformity is through intimate and trusting environments. A baby isn’t likely to question their parents’ beliefs and will trust the connections they introduce. They hear a reiteration of what was initially taught at home through family, school, and churches.

    Althusser’s bravery in exposing these distinctions and insights from other philosophers encourage us to investigate and understand the intentions behind various ideologies. Repressive ideology seems designed to reinforce what has already been ingrained—essentially “brainwashing” us to maintain order and discourage us from thinking outside the box. However, many people have indeed dared to color outside the lines, which is why we’ve fought for the freedoms we cherish today, thanks to the struggles of our ancestors against these constraining ideologies.

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts! How do you see this impacting our autonomy in the digital world? I also appreciated the diagram illustrating different perceptions of power dynamics and control within political and economic systems.

Leave a Reply