1. It seems both articles recognize that class is defined not only by money, but also by self-perception, education, age, and race. Both readings recognize and discuss the similarities of how people perceive their classes, but the reality may be different. The biggest difference between the articles seems to be that while 4.2 discusses how different neighborhoods and boroughs are tied to different levels of income, 4.1 discusses a lot of the sociology behind how people perceive their class.
2. The closest station to me is Morgan Ave (L) in Bushwick, BK. I think this statistic is a half-truth. The median income for this station is listed at around 80K, and yes, while much of the neighborhood is populated by educated, mostly white transplants, a lot of the neighborhood is inhabited by working-class Puerto Rican and Dominican residents. If we look at Montrose Ave, which is almost equally far as Morgan from me, you’ll see how the number is much more modest (37K). I think when you put these side by side, it shows how the neighborhood is being gentrified.
3. 4.2 shows how there are many centers of wealth within this city. Income inequality can literally be demonstrated by walking down some main streets in this city. It shows that wealthy areas are more in the center of the city (with some exceptions), and most of the working-class population is concentrated in the outer boroughs.