- The concept “faction” reminds me of the idea of interest groups or political parties. Both represent divisions in society where people unite around shared interests, usually economic or political, and sometimes those interests clash with others. Madison worried that factions could threaten stability by putting self-interest above the common good.
2. According to Federalist #10, the source of wealth is private property, which comes from the diversity of human faculties talents, skills, and abilities. Madison argues that because people have different abilities, ambitions, and resources, some will naturally acquire more property than others. This inequality creates divisions between classes those with property the wealthy and those without the poor.
3. I partly agree with this explanation of wealth and poverty. It’s true that people have different skills and opportunities, but it leaves out how systems of privilege, inheritance, and discrimination also shape who gets wealth and who doesn’t. For example, someone may work just as hard but never gain wealth if they lack access to education or land. So, while Madison explains inequality as natural, in reality it is also social and political.
4. The “first object” of the U.S. government, according to Madison, is the protection of property rights. This might sound surprising because today we often think the government’s core mission is protecting equality, rights, and freedoms. But it makes sense in the historical context: the framers were property-owning elites who feared losing their wealth to majority rule. Today, while property rights are still protected, many people expect government to also provide social programs, justice, and equality.
5. I am not surprised that Federalist #10 favors a republican form of government instead of a pure democracy. A pure democracy would give direct power to the majority, which worried Madison because he feared the poor majority could unite and pass laws threatening the wealthy minority. By supporting a representative government, Madison believed it would filter and control factions, protecting elite interests while still giving some voice to the people. This shows how deeply connected social class was to the design of the Constitution.
1:- Reading 4.3 explains that the main distinction is about control of resources and labor.
–> Owners (capitalists) control the means of production factories, businesses, or capital. They earn money primarily through ownership and profit. Example: the CEO of Amazon, or someone who owns a chain of restaurants.
–> Employees (workers) don’t own productive resources and must sell their labor for wages. Example: an Amazon warehouse worker or a server at one of those restaurants.
So, the key difference is that owners live off profits, while employees live off wages.
2. Adam Smith quote (pg. 28)
Adam Smith argues that labor is the real source of value in society. Everything we produce, buy, or use comes from human labor in some form. Without workers, no wealth can be created owners depend on employees, not the other way around. This challenges the idea that wealth comes just from owning property; instead, it highlights how labor is the foundation of all economic activity.
3:- Main argument of Reading 4.4 (“class is NOT an identity”)
The reading argues that class is not simply about how people feel or identify, but about the material relationships people are in. For example, someone might identify as middle class because of education or lifestyle, but if they rely on wages to survive, they are part of the working class. In other words, class is objective it comes from your relationship to production not just subjective identity. I think this is important because it avoids confusion: you can’t “choose” your class the way you might identify with a culture or community.
4. “Class structures are built around a close form of dependency” (Reading 4.4)
This means that different classes depend on each other, but in an unequal way. Owners need employees to work for them to make profit, and employees need owners for jobs and wages to survive. This dependency is “close” because both groups are locked into a relationship within capitalism neither can exist in the same way without the other.
–> Example: In a hospital, doctors, nurses, and staff depend on the hospital corporation for their jobs, while the hospital owners depend on the staff’s labor to run the hospital and generate profit.