Veronica Gonzalez
POL 100 (0504) – Intro. to American Govt. – Fall 2022
Discussion Board 2.2
- Why do you think southern racist politicians chose to frame their defense of racial segregation through the language of “law and order”? What special advantages was this choice of words going to give them?
Response:
Southern racist politicians chose to frame their defense of racial segregation through the term and language of “law and order” for the simple fact that the term it self created an air of false patriotism. To be a patriot is to be devoted to and vigorously support one’s country, its ideals and laws. Southern whites could not see, or some did not want to see, that the conditions that the African American population had endured for so many years were immoral, illegal and demeaning. When the Civil Rights movement came about, it became a movement that recognized a struggle and knew that only action was going to make a real change. Civil disobedience and the tactics used such as sit-ins, walkouts, marches, boycotts and protests were now being seen as opposition to the government, were being blamed for increased crime, were seen as “breaking the law” and “creating disorder”. This sentiment was very much echoed in the southern whites who continued to voice that the old “home rules” and Jim Crow laws served a purpose, they kept blacks in their place which meant the law and order was being kept. As stated by M. Alexander, “Support of Civil Rights legislation was derided by Southern conservatives as merely “rewarding lawbreakers (Alexander pg. 40)”. Basically the very grassroots methods of making a change in society were now being denounced as a cause of increased crime and government instability.
The choice of framing their new racial order with the term “law and order” gave southern racists special advantages in that the term “law and order” allowed southern whites who still supported segregation (Jim Crow Laws) away to exercise segregation but under the guise of now we are fighting against crime. M. Alexander states, “they developed instead racially sanitized rhetoric of “cracking down on crime” – rhetoric that is now used freely by politicians of every stripe (Alexander pg. 42)”.
- Do you think the Southern Strategy is still influencing American politics?
Give an example supporting your answer.
Response:
The Southern Strategy was a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans. I do believe that the Southern Strategy is in effect in some form within our government but as it has been done in the past, it has been reframed with eloquent wording, in order to mask its true intention and interpretation which is racism.
One example of this would be how certain Republican party candidates appeal to white populations in every state by using fear wording, saying things like “defend the U.S. from invaders (immigrants)” or “Make America Great Again” by pushing out what is not white, is foreign, is ethnic or is black and brown. People forget that the U.S. is a melting pot of many different colors, races, beliefs and this is what makes us unique. When a society begins to show signs of breaking down there can be many causes to it, but at the center of it all is respect. When individuals no longer respect each other what kind of a society can we expect to be.