1.) “America is inherently a “white” country: in character, in structure, in culture. Needless to say, black Americans create lives of their own. Yet as a people, they face boundaries and constrictions set by the white majority. America’s version of apartheid, while lacking overt legal sanction, comes ” (Hacker 1992). The concept of “whiteness” and “white racialized identity” refers to how white people, their traditions, culture, and worldview serve as the benchmark against which all other groups are measured. Comprehending race in America also starts with understanding whiteness. Nonwhite people are viewed as inferior or abnormal due to whiteness and the normalization of white racial identity throughout America’s history. Because they can navigate society by feeling normal and being perceived as normal, white people also benefit from this white-dominated culture on a social level. Since whiteness has been accepted in their society, those who identify as white rarely have to consider their racial identity. The term “white dominant culture” refers to how white people and their customs, values, and culture have come to be accepted as the norm in the United States over time. As a result, everyone in America—including people of color—has embraced certain elements of white culture. According to the idea of “white supremacy,” white people are superior to non-whites. This argument is based on the same scientific racism and pseudoscience that have been used throughout history to defend slavery, colonialism, imperialism, and genocide. The idea that white people are racially superior continues to be spread by white nationalist ideas and its adherents. In recent years, overt acts of racism that uphold white supremacy have become more prevalent. These actions have a closer connection to white nationalism. The idea of white nationalism emerged from white supremacy. A focus on nationhood is a significant distinction. Due to emotions of entitlement and racial superiority, white nationalists in the United States support a nation that is exclusively for people of the white race. They also hold the view that the variety of Americans would result in the eradication of whites and white culture, which is why they are associated with white supremacist ideology.
2.) A crucial aspect of the growth of secular nations, participatory democracy, individual rights, and modern ideas of freedom is the practice of locking individuals in cages for some or all of their life. These contemporary institutions were challenged to create stability from “the accumulation and useful management” of individuals who were on the move in a “community of strangers,” which was most severe when capitalism thrived unchecked. Prisons met the demands of reformers who had largely won the battle against corporal punishment, which is still practiced today in the form of the death penalty and numerous torturous incarceration conditions, as well as depersonalized social control, allowing it to be bureaucratically managed across time and space. Oddly enough, the emergence of prisons coincides with two significant social changes: the rise of civic activism to defend the oppressed and the rise of the word freedom to represent what is desired. Prison’s connection to dispossession has been well investigated. The reason for locking individuals up, which straddles ethics and the law, is based on the idea that certain people should lose their freedom (which we might define in this case as control over one’s body habits, pastimes, relationships, and movement) as a result of specific crimes. Prison is not necessary because there are criminals. No and yes. While it may seem obvious that “crime” and “jail” go hand in hand, the definition of crime is fluid, and the punishment for those found guilty of a crime is not always a prison sentence. Crime is defined as breaking the law in the straightforward words of the secular state. Laws change based on what constitutes stability in a social order and who in a social order needs to be controlled. If jail was intended in its philosophical inception to be a compassionate alternative to beatings, torture, or death, it has now evolved into a permanent component of modern life that is not renowned for its humanity, not even by its advocates and administrators. More than two million individuals are currently jailed in the United States, the bulk of them are black or brown and come mostly from underprivileged neighborhoods. Prisons have not only violated human rights and failed to rehabilitate inmates; it is also unclear if they actually reduce crime or boost public safety. I am torn between Agreeing or Disagreeing her point of view, but instead of directly battling jails and hoping others would join her, her tactic was to look for groups that were already mobilized. Whether it be local community members concerned about a jail’s effects on the water table or environmentalists who may be persuaded that a new prison would harm biodiversity or unfulfilled promises of local jobs.
3.) We move away from theories of mass imprisonment and racist violence centered on unbroken histories of prejudice or the tedious constraint of neoliberal economics with Abolition Geography. Instead, Gilmore provides a spatial understanding of how modern racial capitalism functions as a “anti-state state” that responds to crises by orchestrating the systematic abandoning of individuals and surroundings judged surplus to needs. Gilmore avoids flat ideas of what freedom requires, who desires liberation, or what is actually to be eliminated. Abolition Geography challenges the association between abolition and merely demarcation by drawing on the teachings of grassroots organization and internationalist imaginaries, and it serves as a timely reminder that freedom is not just a concept but also a physical location. However, mass imprisonment is excellent for the prison-industrial complex’s bottom line. Construction and upkeep of prisons are expensive, and they frequently win lucrative government contracts. Because of this, several segments of the building, service, and security sectors have a financial stake in seeing as many individuals as possible locked up.