The ruling of Walmart versus Duke’s was unable to bring a victory towards the female employees that brought the case to court. An issue of “commonality” emerged and heavily swayed their ruling. The Supreme Court denied it to agree any commonality within the participants or any given solution due to the class action lawsuits primary issue at large. The Supreme Court do 9 to 8 dollars Walmart employees as a distinct class that was entirely insecure in their job environment. The kicker was truly the size of the class action lawsuit with millions of women included as plaintiffs.

Q #1: within the government, elected branches control a crucial role in protecting our individual rights within this country. The justice system is comprised of a list of judges aren’t influenced by any public opinions. These judges are not elected by the public, and are more equipped to cover controversial cases versus elected officials. For instance, in the Brown v. Board of Education case, these judges concluded that they would protect people regardless if it was politically not a moral idea.

Q #2: In a way, it’s quiet surface level that the Supreme Court is anti-democratic. It’s blatant that the structure to educate public opinion into the decision making progress is that an all time low. These elected judges serve lifelong terms in the public office. They also partake in biased judgment by ruling in favor of the ruling party. The supreme court judges normally do not have the support of the people and that’s just the way it is. The main reason for selecting judges this way is to guard the individual interests of the wealthy which Federalist #10 proves. Whoever is president at the time is enabled to nominate judges who is opinions on who is pets are mainly narrow down by the view and likes of the wealthy class.

Q #1: it’s a modernized version of war as it manipulates people’s fears and emotions, the inter-workings of a human and ever so vulnerable. It doesn’t identify any particular enemy where our past wars have targeted a known enemy.

Q #2: A “roving wiretap” is a designated permanent allowed for lawn Forssman and it enables them to follow the surveillance target. Perhaps leads to the idea of it being a violation of the fourth amendment which is the right to privacy.

Q #3: A “sneak peek “is a search warrant that permits authorization to law-enforcement for them to access someone’s private premises without their permission or knowledge, seemingly another violation of the fourth amendment.

Q #1: The establishment clause can be defined as the first amendment of the United States Constitution that bans Congress from establishing a state religion; it prevents any passage that gives or force the belief of anyone’s religion. The lemon test was executed by the government to conclude whether the clause was in violation or not.

Q #2: The first amendment does protect an American flags burning since it is deemed a freedom of speech which is protected by the first amendment.

Q #3: pleading the fifth associating to the fifth amendment translates to a person having the right to remain silent to avoid incriminating themselves without an attorney present as well as having the right to refuse counsel.

Q #1: Both concepts that were discussed in class that strike me for “faction” are social class and political parties.

Q #2: Federalist number 10 exclaim that the faculties of men is the source of wealth which translates to their position in society including what they inherit.

Q #3: obviously the rich are still rich and the poor are going to continue to be poor.

Q #4: The prime mission that the US government has prioritized has been protecting the wealth of the online class and assisting in then becoming richer by enabling them ways to do this. It is not at all shocking the way the wealthy continue to look out for each other.

Q #5: federalist number 10 is not in favor of the Democratic Party which is not even the slightest bit shocking. This is since they believe that the Republican Party enables them to be protected in the wealthy class’ interest and therefore it is only right that they favor the republican party versus any other.

The diagram of M-C-M elaborates on the way capitalists maintain and grow their wealth. Mia currency, C is commodity, and M’ is greater than M. To extend the longevity of someone’s wealth and to grow it for the future, Capitalists understood that they have to invest their capitals as well as purchase commodities to sell. Is capitals include purchasing property, machinery, Ron materials, equipment, and labor force in order to produce more commodities to stay wealthy and extend one’s well for the future.

The ability of attaining a commodity with finances which are already owned and is subsequently sold to create more of a financial gain is known as the MCM. The amount of money gathered over the amount of money kept is considered a profit. M’ translates to the method through which capitalists increase their profit, which is also known as surplus value. From this, Capitalists invest money into commodities that are subsequently sold at competitive prices on the market, which allows them to gain more profit and continue to be live wealthily.

Q #1: To simply state the difference between owner and employee is that the owner execute zero labor while extracting profit from their employees labor and the employee is the one engaged in wage labor.

Q #2: The pure cost of anything ends up being the sum of the total labor infused into it and that is different from the monetary price which is subject to the necessity of profit for the only entity.

Q #3: I would say that it is practical to agree that class is more than identity. Capitalism surrounds everything and everyone and stems out from that point.

Q #4: Whoever is in government, or is in the ruling class, depend on the monetary gain of the owning class in order to survive. This translates two little to nothing being done to control their power. For instance, in honor of a property who makes the decision to let go of it or to renovate their property. Selling a building includes its own incentives for a high monetary gain with cities frequently prolonging developers’ assistance.