1 Conservatives and liberals

2 According to federalist #10 the source of wealth is property. Some factors that explain why some people posses wealth while others remain poor is that the diversity of men of who get the right of property is an obstacle to a uniformity of interest. In other words, depending on what kind of man acquires the property it can result in a division of society.

3. No, i don’t agree with this explanation of wealth and poverty because it sounds to me that if your wealthy the government works in your favor more than the rest of society, which to them would be the ones that are poor.

4 The core mission of “first object” is to protect different and unequal faculties of acquiring properties. This doesn’t really surprise me because its not entirely different from our society today. In our society there are people that can own and keep their property regardless of talent or if there poor. Even if you were born into wealth and your future decisions make you become poor, the government isn’t going to try to prevent you from being poor.

5 No i’m not surprised that federalist #10 is not in favor of democracy because the democracy works in the favor of everyone regardless of if your rich or poor. The author would dislike a (pure) democratic because it was seen as a small number of citizens that cant prevent the mischiefs of faction .The republicans wants to cure the problems that they have. They want to work in the countries best interest.