The horror of Frankenstein

I would classify the story in Mary Shelley’s novel “Frankenstein” as that of a “fabricating” that was conceived and supposed to be ideal but was ignored by his maker and humanity. Victor, who had finally achieved his lifelong ambition of using science to create a true existence. The creator begins to regret his decision to create Frankenstein due to the way said creation seems and behaves. Victor haunts Frankenstein, and when he dies, he leaves his wish to kill Frankenstein to Walton. We discover that Frankenstein laments the death of his father despite being labeled as the “monster” species and hated by even his own creator. Frankenstein still felt the agony of losing a loved one despite his suffering of being labeled as evil and only being described with adjectives like horrific and other names that described his lifestyle thoroughly. Even after being utilized as a dangerous weapon, Frankenstein eventually degenerated into a shell who was disoriented with himself. We witness how all his suffering led him to the conclusion that he wasn’t worth living in a world that rejects him. Victor’s death was the cherry on top, putting an end to his will to live.

A person’s behavior and behaviors are influenced by how they are perceived and viewed by the society in which they live, according to the notion of critical disability. When people are treated unfairly, they are more inclined to act erratically. The monster Frankenstein was tormented by the negative societal evaluations and pity it received because of its physical appearance, which drove it to murder its creator. The story is used to demonstrate how the energy mass regards anything that isn’t a direct mirror of themselves as frightening and deserving of contemplation. It demonstrates that all he needed was one person comprehended him, and potentially appreciated him in order to live a life free of bias.