Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is a federal law that requires the federal government to help local school boards pay for special education services needed by students with disabilities. Yet countless od students are not receiving services because some disabilities are silent and cannot be detected with a naked eye. Extensive testing by neurophysiologists is needed to diagnose these disabilities, but these tests cost thousands of dollars which many families do not have. The government should fully fund the Individuals with Disability Education Act so that neuropsychologists can be in school buildings throughout every district.
Many individuals hear the word disability and immediately think of mobility or physical impairment, such as the inability or limit to basic physical activities of life such as walking and lifting. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a disability is “any condition of the body or mind (impairment) that makes it more difficult for the person with the condition to do certain activities (activity limitation) and interact with the world around them (participation restrictions).”(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Yet many people don’t acknowledge or are unaware of the many unseen disabilities, such as learning disabilities. Learning disabilities affect 1 in 10 schoolchildren. (American Academy of Children & Adolescent Psychiatry).
Students with learning disabilities need to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation to receive a diagnosis. These tests are performed by medical professionals known as neuropsychologists, and often, medical insurances deny the request for evaluations. Educational testing is not covered by insurance because, say, they cover neuropsychological assessment. Still, a majority of plans only cover medical issues such as brain tumors and traumatic brain injuries, leaving families confused and liable for the costs of these expensive tests. A study conducted and published in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology compared the cost of head imaging CT and MRI versus neuropsychological evaluations conducted with technicians revealed that “Five-hour evaluations using technicians averaged $2080 (range $698–$4165). Eight-hour evaluations using technicians averaged $3289 (range $1104–$6657).”
Others may believe that IDEA should not be fully funded even though they agree that more resources are needed to educate children with learning disabilities. “I believe there is a better way to achieve this laudable goal than increasing spending on an unconstitutional failed program” (Rep. Ron Paul). Rep. Paul believes that IDEA is a failed program because lawyers are manipulating the IDEA process in order to get rich. The same lawyers who sue the Department of Education for not providing students with disabilities the resources and accommodations they need to be successful students. Instead of increasing spending on IDEA, Rep. Paul decided to introduce the Family Education Freedom Act (HR 935). This Act will “provide parents with a $3,000 per child tax credit to pay for K-12 education expenses. My tax credit would be of greatest benefit to parents of children with learning disabilities because it will allow them to the vote more of their resources to ensure their children get an education that makes the child’s unique needs.” Rep. Paul should be ashamed of himself for even thinking of this Act. He prefers to dangle a lousy $3,000 at parents who want to desperately help their children rather than fix what is broken, and that is the lack of funding for IDEA.
Fully funding IDEA would benefit all children with disabilities, not only the children with learning disabilities, but they are the ones who need advocacy. Learning disabilities go undetected, and these children suffer for years. Suffer from struggling to learn and being successful students. No child should feel like they aren’t learning despite putting in all the effort or not feeling cared about or understood. There’s only so much schools and parents can do alone. The federal government needs to be held accountable for the lack of support they have given these children. These children’s futures are at stake. They are our future leaders of tomorrow, and they need help now.
One thought on “Fully Funding Individuals with Disabilities Education Act”
PEER REVIEW OF
Amanda Solis
Fully Funding Individual with Disabilities Education Act
1. Does the essay include a thesis statement? What is it? Is it clearly stated and arguable?
The essay includes a thesis and it’s strong, clearly stated and arguable. She starts off the thesis with the issue, which is students with special needs being underrepresented and aren’t receiving needed services geared towards their disabilities. Stating what the government should do for these kids, is spoken in a strong superlative language.
2. Does every paragraph support and/or develop the thesis statement? Explain:
The following paragraphs support the thesis by answering questions it asks. In one paragraph Amanda describes the misconceptions of disabled children and the seriousness of their conditions, another suggests ideas on how to take these issues more seriously, listing evaluative tools to better spot issues and the issues of cost for these types of tests.
3. Is all the supporting evidence directly connected to the thesis statement? Explain:
Yes it is.
4. Does the essay include 3 sources, at least 2 of which come from CQ Researcher? What are they?
There are loads of sources mentioned. Definitely more than three, but I can’t see any CQR mentions in the body, or following the essay. Because it’s so detailed and laden with facts and stats, I wouldn’t be surprised if a CQR source was used and not mentioned.
5. Does the research support the thesis statement without replacing the author’s voice? Explain:
I can’t lie. This essay is loaded with facts and peppered with opinions. Still, it’s balanced and can hear the voice of the author through it all. It just needs a little soul and a lot of personality.
6. Does the author include at least 1 opposing viewpoint, followed by a refutation? What is it?
Yes. An opposing viewpoint from Ron Paul is mentioned in the essay, right before the conclusion, which is his belief that these types of programs are an “unconstitutional failed program” and that it’s just a way for organizations to manipulate and make more money.
7. Is the essay well-organized? Explain?
Yes. There’s an intro, thesis, body and conclusion.
8. Are the grammar, syntax and vocabulary consistent and appropriate for a college level paper? Example?
Good grammar, vocabulary and a college level paper. It’s loaded with information, Amanda’s opinion with an opposing view included.
9. What are the strengths of this draft?
It’s a classic 5 paragraph essay and follows the assignment of being argumentative.
10. Do you have any other comments or suggestions?
I’m pretty satisfied with this essay. I would just say, add more of yourself to your essay. It’s too technical. It would be nice to know how you feel about the subject. Other than that, it’s a great effort. KUDOS.