- Ruth Gilmore says that capitalism will stop being racial capitalism, when all the white people disappear from the story. What’s the connection between “whiteness” and racism, do you think? Ruth Gilmore’s provocative statement that capitalism will stop being “racial capitalism” when all the white people disappear speaks to the deep entanglement of race and capitalism in shaping social, economic, and political systems. The connection between “whiteness” and racism, in this context, can be understood as both a social construct and a key mechanism that structures inequalities within capitalist systems. Whiteness, in Gilmore’s analysis, is not just a skin color but a social and political identity that confers privileges, benefits, and power within a capitalist society. In many Western societies, “whiteness” has historically been associated with access to wealth, land, political rights, and social status. It became an essential part of the construction of race as a hierarchical system where people who were categorized as “white” were systematically advantaged, while others, particularly Black and Indigenous peoples, were subordinated.
2. Gilmore makes the point that criminals are actually being created by the criminal justice and prison system (she says “the category of ‘criminal person’ can be perpetuated”). According to Gilmore, how does that happen, how does the prison system create new “criminals“? Do you agree with her view?
According to professor Gilmore in my estimation she is overstating the fact that in order for prisons to work there needs to be criminals created. How she explains this is done is by creating more laws that can increase the likely hood of being a criminal. Add more behavior that can be deemed devious in the eyes of society so there can be an influx of incarcerations. She also addressed the fact that criminalization has to be deeper meaning the sentences have to be longer. Finally when they come back into the world, or “reentry” as they like to call it they then have to be rehabilitated and have to go back to their community and be apart of it and contribute to that community. This is how I understood professor Gilmore and in my view she is absolutely correct. Judges, dense attorneys, prosecutors down to the correctional officers all have well paying jobs because of these criminals and i’m sure they wouldn’t want to less criminals because that could mean less labor and money for them.
3. Describe how your understand what Prof. Gilmore – in the last part of her video – calls “liberation struggle”?
the way I understand it is life living together and as she says radical dependency. People being informed about their history, political and economy issues. Pretty much like a safe haven or forum to really be conscious and gather life long information and in engage in egoless healthy debates where people can come as they are and be accepted in that community is how i understood professor Gilmore’s liberation struggle.