1.Martin Luther King believes that a just law is a man-made code that follows a moral law .However, an unjust law is a law that disrupts that man-made code because we have to understand that this is about morality .A unjust law hurts the community of who is targeted because they have to follow it without consent and essentially it affects their morality and those around them . An unjust law doesn’t respect those people’s morality or dignity .

2.I Believe that identifying the difference between an unjust and a just law is important because it protects those that understand it .As human beings it is crucial to identify what impairs your moralities and the way you carry yourself in your day to day basis .On the bigger picture is not only about following rules but identifying what makes a country or community better , what brings peace and connection instead of separation and unfairness .This distinction does affect politics because it inspire social movements that shake up politics .

3.Jim Crow laws were unjust laws because they targeted a specific group and made them feel inferior to others , intentionally sabotaging their morals and the way they could live their lives .Later on this unjust law greeted movements that made a change not only in this country but all around the world . A just law protects people’s morals .For example , the 8th amendment prohibits excessive bail, fines, and cruel punishment defending people’s fairness and moralities because you are innocent until proven guilty; this amendment protected you from being treated unfairly under the law.  

According to Martin Luther King Jr., a just law is a code that aligns with the moral law or the law of God. It uplifts human personality and is applied equally, meaning the majority imposes it on the minority while abiding by it themselves. An unjust law does not align with eternal or natural law. It degrades human personality and reflects inequality, such as when the majority imposes it on the minority without being bound by it themselves.

In my view, this distinction is important because it influences how individuals and societies engage with the law and justice. When people understand the moral basis of law, they question and challenge laws that perpetuate injustice. It helps create legal systems that promote fairness and protect vulnerable groups from oppression by the government or the majority. It also influences politics by shaping policy debates and inspiring movements for social change.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is an example of a just law. It prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It uplifts human personality by promoting equality and dignity. Exclusionary zoning laws are an example of unjust law in the USA because they restrict certain types of land use in a community to limit racial and economic diversity. These laws include requirements for minimum lot size or house size that make it difficult for low-income residents to live in an area. It is a discriminatory policy tool. 

1. According to MLK, how can we tell the difference between just and unjust laws? Understanding this questions is the most important part of this module, and I will ask it again during our second exam.

MLK says that a just law is one that lines up with moral values and treats people with dignity. It’s a law that promotes fairness and equality for everyone. On the other hand, an unjust law is one that doesn’t respect people’s rights or dignity, and usually targets specific groups to keep them oppressed or unequal. He also says that an unjust law is often something that’s forced on people without their consent, or it’s something that tries to control or hurt certain groups.

2. In your view, is this an important distinction (between just and unjust laws), do you think it makes a difference in the way someone (as an individual, or our society as a whole) lives their lives? Can it affect our politics?

Yes, I definitely think this is an important distinction. Knowing the difference between just and unjust laws helps us understand when laws are fair and when they’re harmful. It’s not just about following laws because they’re on the books, but questioning whether they’re actually right or just. It makes a big difference in the way we live our lives. If we don’t recognize when a law is unjust, we might just accept it and let it continue to harm people. But when we understand the difference, we can push for change and stand up for what’s right.

3. Based on our discussion of Question 1, give an example each, of an unjust and just law, in the US today. Explain what makes it unjust or just (using MLK’s definition of those two types of laws).

One example of an unjust law we still have today is mandatory minimum sentencing for non-violent drug offenses. Basically, these laws force people to serve long sentences for small drug crimes, no matter the circumstances. They’ve had a huge negative impact on Black and Latino communities, and don’t consider things like whether someone was a first-time offender or had a good reason for their actions. MLK would call these laws unjust because they don’t treat everyone equally, and they end up punishing people way too harshly for things that don’t really deserve that level of punishment. Plus, they’ve led to mass incarceration, especially among people of color.

An example of a just law today is the Voting Rights Act of 1965. This law was made to protect the right to vote for all U.S. citizens, especially people of color who were being unfairly blocked from voting. MLK would definitely call this a just law because it guarantees that everyone has an equal chance to vote, no matter their race or background. It helps make sure our democracy is fair and that everyone’s voice can be heard, which is exactly what MLK was fighting for.

1. According to Martin Luther King Jr., what distinguishes just from unjust laws is that the former are in agreement with the moral or natural law. He defines a just law as one that squares with the moral law or the law of God, which uplifts human personality and dignity. A just law uplifts human personality and dignity. Conversely, an unjust law is one that is in disaccord with moral law. King relates that unjust laws debase human personality by forcing segregation or making one give up the basic rights that should be their birthright, and therefore could not mirror in itself the worthiness of individuals as children of God. He goes on to refer to segregation laws: “For instance, segregation distinctively deploys an unjust operation by burdening African Americans but also twisting the soul of both the oppressor and the oppressed.”. King elaborates on this by referring to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, where “an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.” He also declares, any law which “degrades human personality” is unjust and inversely laws that “uplift human personality” are just. Ultimately, King feels that one has the moral obligation to disobey unjust laws for justice and dignity of humankind.

2. I really think that the difference between just and unjust laws is terribly important. It not only demonstrates a way in which every human being conducts his life but also how societies are supposed to move forward and the entire scheme of morality upon which one bases his actions. Once an individual understands the difference, he finds himself compelled to investigate the law- rather, not just follow it- question whether it conforms to the fundamental principles of fairness, equality, and respect for human dignity. On a personal level, this distinction can radically change how I approach situations involving authority, power, and justice. If I recognize a law as unjust, I’m more likely to feel a moral obligation to resist or challenge it, rather than simply conforming to it out of convenience or fear of punishment. For instance, people like Martin Luther King Jr. did not view the set of laws that supported segregation as binding during the civil rights movement; they comprehended them as oppressive and immoral, and their non-compliance with those laws became a means of fighting for justice. This is the kind of distinction that, at the level of society, may cause movement. When a society begins to question whether their laws are just-be it slavery, segregation, or more current issues such as police brutality or voting rights-then perhaps there is an opportunity for reform and progress. These movements in thought affect the politics. Laws and policies based on injustice can only be challenged when it is recognized that they infringe fundamental ethical principles. Historically, movements for civil rights, gender equality, and the rights of sexual minorities prove that when enough people recognize a law as unjust, they can unite to change it. So yes, I really do think that the way in which we see and judge laws makes a big difference in daily life and throughout history. It is one of the ways in which people and society can try to move toward a more just and fair world, and it’s essential for the health of any democracy that laws governing us be able to be questioned.

3. Here are two examples of an unjust and just law in the US today: Unjust Law: Voter ID Laws 

Many states have implemented laws requiring photo identification for each voter prior to voting. Though proponents argue these bills prevent voter fraud, opponents claim this burdens the minority groups, especially the low-income, the elderly, and people of color, who are not as likely to have the identification in the first place.

This is an unjust law according to MLK’s definition, as it “degrades human personality” through the disfranchisement of people based on their socioeconomic status or race. It puts up barriers to the exercise of a fundamental right-the right to vote-and thus keeps alive inequality in the sense that it affects disproportionately certain groups. This law is not in conformity with the moral law of equality and the right to participate in the democratic process and is, therefore, unjust.  

Just Law: Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage – Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015

An example of a just law, according to MLK’s criteria, would be the legalization of same-sex marriage across the U.S. through the Obergefell v. Hodges decision. The dignity of individuals is asserted in this law by acknowledging that same-sex couples have a right to marry, hence upholding the moral principle of equality. It “uplifts human personality” as it grants equal legal rights and protection to all citizens regardless of their sexual orientation.

This is the just law for MLK because it goes in accordance with the moral law and human dignity: respecting the autonomy, rights, and love of same-sex couples, as it does for heterosexual couples. It works to eliminate discrimination and recognizes that all, regardless of whom they love, have the right to make a legal partnership and family.

In other words, taking up MLK’s distinction, the Voter ID law is unjust in that it disenfranchises people and perpetuates inequality, while the same-sex marriage law is just in that it upholds equal rights and dignity for all people.

1. Martin Luther King Jr. put it simply in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” He said that a just law is one that feels right deep down because it lines up with what we inherently know is morally right—it respects everyone’s dignity. It’s like a rule that uplifts people and treats everyone fairly. On the flip side, an unjust law is one that just feels wrong because it treats people badly and doesn’t mesh with those core moral beliefs we hold. King pointed out that laws enforcing racial segregation were classic examples of unjust laws because they made some people feel inferior to others, messing with their sense of self-worth.
2. Absolutely, it’s crucial. When we can tell the difference between just and unjust laws, it changes how we see our role in the community and our actions. It’s not just about following rules; it’s about supporting laws that make everyone’s life better. On a bigger scale, it shapes our society. Laws that are fair create a peaceful and just society where everyone feels valued. Politically, it’s just as impactful. When people believe that the laws are fair, they’re more likely to follow them and get involved in making their community better. But if laws seem unfair, it can lead to frustration and even protests, which can shake up society.
3. Consider the voter ID laws as an Unjust law example. These laws can seem unfair because they hit harder on minorities, the elderly, and those without a lot of money—people who might not have easy access to IDs. This makes it harder for them to vote. According to King, that’s an unjust law because it doesn’t lift everyone up; instead, it puts barriers in front of them, making them feel less valued and less able to participate in democracy. On the other hand, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a shining example of a just law. This law came into play to stop discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It’s about giving everyone a fair shot, no matter who they are or where they come from, ensuring everyone is treated with respect and given equal opportunities. This kind of law really embodies what King talked about—a law that uplifts humanity by ensuring everyone is respected and free to live their best life. Understanding these types of laws helps us see how deeply laws can affect our everyday lives and the fabric of our society. It’s about more than rules—it’s about building a community where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.

1. According to MLK, how can we tell the difference between just and unjust laws? Understanding this question is the most important part of this module, and I will ask it again during our second exam. According to MLK, we can tell the difference between just and unjust laws since just laws are man-made codes that square with the moral law or the law of God (while also being laws that uplift human personality), while unjust laws are laws are codes that are out of harmony with the moral law (while also being laws that degrade human personality). This essentially means that just laws are laws that abide by natural human morality and are laws that allow people to be who they are so long as they don’t harm or prevent other people from being who they are. Just laws provide safety and freedom of expression to everyone. Unjust laws are essentially laws that do not abide by natural human morality and are laws that limit people from being who they are, despite the fact that they aren’t harming anyone or limiting other people from being who they want to be with their personality. Unjust laws limit both the safety of freedom of expression of people who are doing no wrong.  

2. In your view, is this an important distinction (between just and unjust laws), do you think it makes a difference in the way someone (as an individual, or our society as a whole) lives their lives? Can it affect our politics? I personally do believe that knowing the difference between a just and unjust law can greatly affect how people live their lives both individually and as a society. The reason why I saw this is because someone determining whether or not a law that is active or is being considered is just or unjust can determine what types of actions are taken. If congress wants to pass a law for all states where anyone who goes over 40mph per hour in their cars should get a $100 ticket fine because they believe it is just, you will very likely see many states and their representatives have two opposing sides with arguments occurring. One side would argue against that law because they will see that law as unjust, while the other side would argue for it since they would see the law as just. Having a distinction between just and unjust laws can greatly affect our politics, since people are more likely to join the political party that advocates for laws that they consider just rather than the opposite.  

3. Based on our discussion of Question 1, give an example each, of an unjust and just law, in the US today. Explain what makes it unjust or just (using MLK’s definition of those two types of laws). An example of a just law in the U.S today would be speed limits that are enforced within highways. These speed limits are done in order to prevent people from going up to unnecessary speed on highways in order to prevent unnecessary accidents and deaths. This reflects them being a just law since these laws are just laws that square with the law of god to prevent people from taking unnecessary lives. An example of unjust laws in the U.S today would be having to deal with inflation increases. These laws essentially make it tougher for people with lower amounts to money to be able to continue to live their normal lives and prevents them from being able to ascend past their current position in life. What makes these laws unjust is the fact that they degrade human personality by treating them as if they are made of money. 

How can we tell the difference between just and unjust laws?
According to MLK, a just law is fair, follows moral rules, and treats everyone equally. An unjust law is unfair, goes against moral rules, and harms people or groups.

Is this distinction important? Does it make a difference in how someone lives their life? Can it affect our politics?
Yes, it is important. If people follow unjust laws, it can hurt them and others. Knowing the difference helps people stand up for what is right. It can affect politics by making leaders change unfair laws. For example, when people protested against segregation laws, it led to changes in the law and society.

Example of an unjust law in the US today:
Some states have voting laws that make it harder for certain groups to vote, like strict voter ID laws. This is unjust because it doesn’t treat everyone equally and stops some people from having a voice in democracy.

Example of a just law in the US today:
Anti-discrimination laws, like the Civil Rights Act, are just because they protect everyone from being treated unfairly based on race, gender, or religion. These laws make society more equal and fair.

1.According to MLK, how can we tell the difference between just and unjust laws?

According to Martin Luther King Jr., the difference between just and unjust laws lies in whether the law aligns with moral law and upholds human dignity. In his Letter from Birmingham Jail (1963), King explains that just laws are those that promote human rights, equality, and justice, and are in harmony with the moral principles of justice, such as fairness and respect for individuals. He argued that just laws uplift the community and encourage people to act with a sense of shared responsibility and respect for each other’s rights. In contrast, unjust laws are those that degrade human dignity, enforce inequality, or unjustly limit freedom. King pointed out that an unjust law is one that is applied to a particular group in a discriminatory way, such as segregation laws that treated African Americans as second-class citizens. He famously said, “An unjust law is a code that a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on itself.”

2. In your view, is this an important distinction (between just and unjust laws), do you think it makes a difference in the way someone (as an individual, or our society as a whole) lives their lives? Can it affect our politics?

It is very crucial to know the difference between just and unjust law as well. It can change the lives of people and the society as well. This is because it provides people with the ability to challenge such laws as was witnessed during the Civil Rights Movement. It also influences our political activities; we get to vote or petition for change when laws are made in a way that they serve to discriminate or infringe laws on are people’s just rights. or Thus, not, if then we we just are follow just the contributing laws to without the even worsening questioning of whether the these situation. Also, insofar as society is concerned, this also helps in ensuring that the laws that are being implemented are favorable and just and will not only favor the powerful. Last, this distinction establishes both the domain of moral responsibility and the domain of political action for the enhancement of the society.

3. Based on our discussion of Question 1, give an example each, of an unjust and just law, in the US today. Explain what makes it unjust or just (using MLK’s definition of those two types of laws).

An example of an unjust law in the U States today is specific voter ID laws. These make laws it mandatory for people to produce government issued photo identification to be allowed to vote but these laws serve to discriminate against minorities, the poor, people of color and the elderly who may have difficulties in getting the required IDs. In the definition given by Martin Luther King Jr, an unjust law is any law that denies the equal right of all people and degrades the dignity of the individual. Voter ID laws can be prevents viewed them as from unjust exercising given their that democratic they rights. suppress In the this voting way, rights these of laws certain go groups against of the people very which foundation in of turn equality because they apply different sets of rules to different people depending on their status as citizens. This is a situation that goes a long way to create an imbalance in the political system, which tends to work against those who are already oppressed. On the other hand, a just law in the U. S is the legalization of same sex marriage which was cemented by the 2015 supreme court ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges case. This law establishes that every adult, regardless of his or her sexual perspective orientation, of has MLK, the this right could to be marry classified the as person just he law or since she it loves. equals In the the rights of all people and respect their human dignity. Through the legalization of same sex marriage the law removes any form of discrimination and offers equal treatment of people regardless of the persons they love. This is consistent with King’s idea of justice which can be referred to as the rights of every individual as well as the fight against any form of discrimination. The acceptance of same-sex marriage establishes that the they dignity are of not the excluded LGBTQ+ from people receiving and the guarantees same treatment and protections like other people, thus making our society a better place. Hence, voter ID laws are unfair because they have the effect of denying certain people the right to vote since they are not Affected equally as they are called to do by the constitution. On the other hand marriage equality is just since it affords everyone the equal right, dignity and respect that is due to them as citizens. The distinction is in the way that a given law addresses people, does it raise everybody up or does it put them down in a systematic fashion, which is the definition of justice according to MLK.

1. According to MLK, the distinction between just and unjust laws rests on their relationship to moral law and human dignity. He builds his argument carefully by explaining that a just law aligns with moral law or what he calls “the law of God,” while unjust laws conflict with moral law. But he doesn’t stop at abstract definitions. He makes it concrete by explaining that just laws elevate human dignity while unjust ones degrade it. Drawing on St. Thomas Aquinas, he argues that just laws must be rooted in eternal and natural law. What’s particularly moving is how he applies this to segregation laws. He argues that they are unjust because they give the segregated a false sense of inferiority while giving the segregator a false sense of superiority. It’s a profound analysis of how laws can either uplift or diminish our shared humanity.

2. I believe this distinction between just and unjust laws is absolutely crucial for both individuals and society. Think about it – this framework gives us a moral compass for civil disobedience, suggesting that thoughtfully resisting unjust laws while accepting the consequences can actually show deep respect for the rule of law. MLK’s examples, from the Boston Tea Party to the early Christians, show how this principle has shaped history. What really strikes me is how this challenges us to think critically about laws rather than assuming that legal equals moral. MLK solidified this by saying, “We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was “legal.” This framework isn’t just theoretical; rather, this distinction helps us think critically about laws rather than blindly accept them.

3. Looking at contemporary America through MLK’s lens, we can find clear examples of both just and unjust laws. The Americans with Disabilities Act stands out as a just law because it genuinely “uplifts human personality” by ensuring equal access and opportunities for disabled individuals. It recognizes and protects human dignity in exactly the way MLK described. On the other hand, the Patriot Act, particularly its surveillance provisions, embodies what MLK would likely consider an unjust law. It degrades human personality by allowing extensive government surveillance of citizens without adequate oversight, infringing on privacy rights, and potentially targeting certain communities disproportionately. The act’s broad powers to monitor personal communications, access private records, and conduct searches with limited judicial oversight echo MLK’s concerns about laws that diminish individual dignity and create what he called a “false sense of inferiority” among targeted groups. Just as MLK criticized laws that gave some people power over others without proper safeguards, the Patriot Act’s provisions often place government authority above individual rights and human dignity.