Discussion board 5.3 Marissa Ramos Torres

In the U. S. , the top 1% of households hold more wealth than the bottom 90% combined, showcasing extreme wealth inequality. This concentration of economic power highlights disparities in opportunity and social mobility. It raises concerns about fairness, justice, and the democratic system’s health. The inequality challenges equal opportunity ideals and emphasizes the necessity for policies addressing systemic barriers to wealth distribution, illustrating how a small elite can influence economic policies to the detriment of the majority.

Living in a society with substantial wealth inequalities can cause decreased social mobility, political influence, social fragmentation, and fitness disparities. Wealth attention hinders upward mobility, limits democratic participation, creates divisions, and correlates with fitness disparities. In ordinary life, those dynamics are glaring in schooling disparities, housing challenges, and unequal get entry to to offerings like healthcare. Wealthier regions frequently have better-funded schools, even as growing housing prices can displace lower-profits households via gentrification. Individuals with better earning have get entry to to non-public healthcare, even as lower-profits people depend on underfunded public offerings. These implications of wealth inequality form the reviews of people and communities, highlighting the want for a extra equitable society.

Discussion Board 5.2

The M-C-M’ diagram outlines a key process in capitalism where capitalists maintain and grow their wealth. Starting with money (M) accumulated from investments or profits, they purchase commodities (C) like raw materials or labor to initiate production. After selling these commodities, they aim to generate more money (M’) than they initially invested, representing profit. This cycle illustrates the capitalist goal of profit maximization. By reinvesting profits, capitalists can purchase more commodities, expand production, and accumulate wealth over time. The process involves converting money into commodities, adding value through labor, and realizing profits upon sale. This highlights how capitalists exploit surplus value from workers to enhance their wealth and solidify their economic position. Overall, the M-C-M’ process emphasizes the relationship between labor, value creation, and wealth accumulation in capitalist economies.

Discussion Board 4.1 Marissa Ramos Torres

1-Both readings speak about social elegance and how a few humans have greater or much less than others. They examine such things as money, education, and what society thinks about humans to recognize this better. In primary studying, they discover social elegance through searching at private testimonies and culture. In the second one studying, they use the subway gadget in New York to expose how social elegance works. Both readings explain how social elegance influences regular lifestyles. The first makes a specialty of how humans experience approximately themselves primarily based totally on their elegance, even as the second suggests how the subway can hold exclusive social training apart. The first study uses more extraordinary thoughts and emotions to research things, while the second one, studying, appears to be real-life examples, like how public transportation can separate humans. They may use surveys and interviews to acquire statistics for their analysis.

Discussion Board 5.1 Marissa Ramos Torres

Means of production refer to the resources needed for production like factories, machinery, and materials, while labor is the human effort involved. Value in a product is determined by labor input, scarcity, demand, and socially necessary labor time. Labor directly affects value – more labor-intensive products have higher value. Labor is the work performed, while labor power is the potential to work and is sold to employers for wages. Surplus value is the profit derived by capitalists from workers’ labor – it shows the exploitation in the capitalist system. Understanding surplus value is crucial for analyzing class exploitation and economic inequality, as it highlights how workers create more value than they receive in wages, benefiting business owners. For example, if a worker generates $30 of value but is paid $15, the surplus value is $15, allowing for profit and wealth accumulation for business owners.