Summary

1. According to Martin Luther King Jr. the difference between just and unjust laws lies in their conformity to moral principles. Just laws align with moral standards, such as equality and human dignity, whereas unjust laws contradict these principles. King emphasizes that just laws are rooted in natural or divine law, while unjust laws are arbitrary and discriminatory.
2. Yes, I think it makes a difference. The distinction between just and unjust laws is indeed crucial as it significantly influences individual behavior, societal values, and political dynamics. Recognizing and upholding just laws fosters a sense of justice, equality, and respect for human rights within individuals and society. Conversely, unjust laws can perpetuate inequality, oppression, and social unrest. This understanding can drive individuals to engage in activism, advocacy, and legal reform to challenge unjust laws and promote justice and equality. In politics, the distinction between just and unjust laws can shape policy debates, electoral choices, and government actions, influencing the direction of governance and societal progress.
3. An example of a just law in the United States today is legislation that protects voting rights and ensures equal access to the electoral process for all citizens. Such laws uphold the principle of equality and align with King's definition of just laws as promoting fairness and human dignity. Conversely, an unjust law could impose harsh sentencing for minor drug offenses, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. This type of law perpetuates systemic injustice and violates the principles of fairness and equality outlined by King.