Category Archives: Reflection 4

Crystal Cordero Reflection 4

I enjoyed reading  the passage from Audre Lorde’s “There Is No Hierarchy of Oppressions.” I completely agree that social issues like racism and homophobia interact with one another and should be treated equally seriously. I have a strong commitment to end the cycles of racism and homophobia. 

Another great read was Patriarchy, the System by Alan Johnson. It’s true that some individuals use the term “the system” as a scapegoat to escape responsibility for social concerns. When it comes down to it, though, it is undoubtedly the consequence of a number of systems, all of which were created by humans and are supported in multiple ways by members of our society. We must look further into the roots of patriarchal thoughts and ideas if the patriarchy is to be overthrown. We continue to be impacted by the systems we build because we live in them, which feeds the cycle. We essentially support a system that harms us just by being here and doing what we must to survive. We feel obligated to take part. It certainly gives me a lot to think about. 

Amaris Mujica discussion 5 & reflection 4

  • Why is it important to recognize patriarchy as a system and not an individual identity?
  • While patriarchy is a system, individuals enact patriarchy in their personal thoughts, interpersonal actions, as members of institutions, and in the structures of our culture. Use the levels of oppression outlined below, to discuss how patriarchy might work at each level and how those levels influence one another.

Before anything I think we should identify the word patriarchy, it can be a society or even individuals who participate in it.

The point the article is trying to prove is that it is easy to assume and blame society for all our problems, this includes the way we act and think. We cannot assume an individual belongs to a society, for example poverty and class oppression comes from the upper class being greedy, cruel, and heartless.

The mistake that we often make is that we often like to point fingers and blame the so called system for patriarchy. We never sit down to think what makes the system an actual group and who is involved in it. We cannot keep blaming systems for our social problems.

Race, gender, and class oppression are not actual oppression. However that what white men with power makes us think oppression is.Women oppression comes from men who want to dominate women and out of hostility word them.

Thinking outside the box :Sick and angry men who do dumb decisions such as abuse/rape and other dangerous activities, should be questioned. What would make these men act or think this way, what is the cause? What type of society would produce this type of men 

We are the individuals who make systems, live in them, accept it, identify and participate in them, just like the author mentions it all the time we have to be more aware if our actions if we want change. Family, religion, economy, peoples lives are shaped to these groups.It is not like we do not know how to communicate towards each other, we do it all the time when we complain, in order to earn power we have to we have to develop some type of personal identity relation to other people. Remember that patriarchy is composed of certain types of social relationships, when we are in groups we are more likely to be influenced by other actions or words.

Mame leye Discusion#5

Men hold primary power and dominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property within the system of oppression known as patriarchy. Patriarchy privileges men over women and non-male individuals and can be seen in various ways, such as structural, institutional, intrapersonal, and interpersonal. This social structure normalizes discrimination and oppression based on sex and gender, affecting people of all genders and hindering their organic growth and development. The United States has been and continues to be an example of patriarchy, where men hold the majority of power and privilege in society. It is crucial for students to understand patriarchy as a system of oppression, its function, and how it contributes to a gender-based hierarchy in society. By understanding patriarchy, we can work towards dismantling the system and achieving social justice and equity.

Persona.  The Society’s personal aspect pertains to people’s beliefs, particularly on the undervaluation of women in this generation. According to my female acquaintances, they feel the need to prove themselves more than men when in male-dominated spaces, as they are perceived as weak. Moreover, they have experienced sexualization in their workplaces. Thus, the patriarchy presents women as inferior to men and objectifies them.

Interpersonal.   Accountability for actions and behaviors towards women is lacking in a patriarchal society, which allows the system to remain intact. Johnson argues that complete control over the patriarchal system is impossible, but we can still make choices that deviate from societal norms and create our own unique paths. By holding individuals responsible and working towards societal change, gender equality may be achieved. Everyday language reinforces the notion that men are superior to women, with phrases such as “men are breadwinners” and “that’s a man’s job” perpetuating this idea.

Institutional.  Women have various approaches to certain things that are influenced by unwritten policies or rules. These policies or rules are not documented, but they can be problematic. Women face a greater risk than men because they can be overpowered not just verbally but also physically. This can result in people being taken advantage of. It is effortless to threaten a woman with her job by using personal information against her. Unfortunately, these situations often escalate into sexual harassment.

Cultural.  Participation in a patriarchal society perpetuates the cultural/structural level of oppression. Certain beliefs, deeply ingrained over many years, underpin this societal structure. In African culture, men are traditionally viewed as providers while women are relegated to caretaking roles, such as child-rearing and nursing. Women are labeled as providers of emotional support and nurturing while men are expected to bring in money to support the family. This normalization of gender roles has persisted across generations with little resistance to the notion of equality.

Irina Nissen: Reading Reflection 4

Audre Lorde’s piece “There is no Hierarchy of Oppression” argues that intersectionality is crucial to battling oppression. As a result of each person’s unique identity, various modes of discrimination come about. For instance, a white lesbian and a black lesbian both face oppression but in a very different manners. Lorde notes how often times people mistakenly categorize these individuals into the same subgroups. This is detrimental to the nuances of the conversation. Going back to my example,  a conversation involving these two women and (let’s say) other white women, could ignore the way race correlates to gender oppression. What it all boils down to really is that all fights against oppression want to reach the same goal: ridding injustice, equality, and representation for all. Lorde is saying that you can’t really be fighting oppression if you’re not fighting all oppression and if you are not actively trying to learn a diverse range of experiences (other than your own). Allan G. Johnson also points out the importance of nuance and what actions are actually productive when trying to create change in society. His ideas argue that we are not at mercy to “the system” and question what the system actually is. The most significant thing I grasped from this reading was that we should not focus on determining who is more or less the cause of the patriarchy (individual actions) but rather place importance on how we would dismantle a system that perpetuates patriarchal ideology. Essentially meaning how can we restart, educate others, and figure out the real root of the problem. 

Reading reflection 4

There is No Hierarchy of Oppressions by Audre Lorde and Allan Johnson both offer precise analyses of oppression systems and the necessity of unity in social justice movements. By Johnson’s study, patriarchy is a social framework that benefits males and disadvantages women, as well as a set of established attitudes and practices. He shows how this system functions in different aspects of life, including family, job, politics, and culture. The harm it causes to men and women and how it encourages gender injustice is also shown. Johnson highlights the need to understand and fight patriarchy as a structural framework for gender-based oppression rather than blaming particular men or women.
In her essay, Lorde examines several forms of oppression, such as racism, sexism, homophobia, and classism.

Adam Saidi Reflection#4

After reading it made me believe that all those beliefs are made by society and it’s been happening for years. It is very sad that women have come a long way to fight for equality and their rights. We the future generations are the only person who can change this and I am glad that there’s been changement over the years because I do come from a culture where women have to be obedient towards men and that we should stay home and take care of the kid while men go and provide for the house, I am so glad that I am being able to pursue my education and making the decision of my own. 

Donya-Shae Gordon- Reading Reflection 4

A patriarchal society consists of a male-dominated power structure. Patriarchy is a system of relationships, beliefs, and values embedded in political, social, and economic systems that structure gender inequality between men and women. Attributes seen as “feminine” or pertaining to women are undervalued. Men are granted the privilege while women are oppressed. It is a system rather than an individual identity because the system creates the privilege men are presented and at times the system is operated by different genders which enables the privilege. I do believe that in society it has to be such a norm prior to reading the two assigned readings I knew it was a thing but took it as a norm.

It has always been harder for women than for the male population. For some women of color, it is harder than for white women. The overall oppression of women is still the same outcome. I have been in the world of tech for the last 10 years and that is a male-dominated industry and I have had it ruff. I always had to prove my worth no matter what position I was in within the company. I have gotten snarky remarks, looks, and the bold statements of “you’re a woman you don’t know what you’re doing”. Learning about the different levels was an eye-opener and showed me how they all tie into one. I wonder if there will ever be a time there will be equality for all without differences.

Reading Reflection #4 – Josue Vasquez

In this week’s readings the Patriarchy, the System by Allan Johnson and There is No Hierarchy of oppression by Audre Lorde from what i read i can understand is that What we think of as normal life is related to male privilege, women’s oppression, and the fully, but we also avoid taking responsibility either for ourselves or for patriarchy. Instead, ‘the system’ serves as a vague, unarticulated catch-all, a dumping ground for social problems, a scapegoat that can never be held to account and that, for all the power we think it has, cannot talk back or actually do anything. In the readings it says that she has learned that oppression and the intolerance of difference come in all shapes and sex’s and colors and sexualities and that among those of us who share the goals of liberation and a workable future for our children, there can be no hierarchies of oppression. This I see is something that is true and it’s also a statement that I believe many people would also agree with this to me is seen as the main point of the readings its the oppression on many people with different backgrounds.