The leaked documents related to the significant legal case Roe v. Wade. Supporters of abortion rights might express concern or alarm if the leaked document indicates a potential threat to the landmark ruling. They may view it as a potential attack on reproductive rights and a setback for women’s autonomy and bodily autonomy. Opponents of abortion rights, on the other hand, might view the leaked document as an opportunity for potential legal changes that align with their beliefs. They might express hope that it could lead to a reconsideration or overturning of the Roe v. Wade decision. Justice Anthony Alito’s draft opinion on the Roe v. Wade case uses the phrase “egregiously wrong” to describe Roe, echoing language used by Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart and Kavanaugh in 2020. He also observes that some early proponents of abortion rights had unsavory views in favor of eugenics, suggesting that Roe has had a disproportionate percentage of aborted fetuses are black. Alito’s draft opinion rejects the idea that abortion bans reflect the subjugation of women in American society, noting that the percentage of women who register to vote and cast ballots is higher than the percentage of men. It also rejects the idea that abortion bans reflect the subjugation of women in American society, noting that the percentage of women who register to vote and cast ballots is higher than the percentage of men.