Both readings show a different perspective on the view of oppression but I really enjoyed reading Allan’s point of view because it breaks down the components through a sociological understanding. Through a sociological way, breaking it down from the root to the stem then through all of the little things that put it together.

Patriarchy has been rooted into our system, minds, and the way we comprehend. Patriarchy has put boundaries on what gender’s can be, and our bodies being more valued than our intelligence. Cultures are being put on a stand because of how different everyone is and it doesn’t match the ideals of women and men that have been in placed. The pressure of being a man has made a mentality of toxicity where a man believes he is better and has carried more weight than a man.

“The oppression of women happened because men wants” Men’s hostility towards the idea of women being or having power is sickening to them. Since they been appointed to power and are the symbol of strength. They see women as a threat, a threat to their masculinity. This mindset is toxic to younger boys who are growing into being a man, with this mentally it becomes toxic for women. Men are more excused and (babied) to the point where if a women makes a mistake it is blasted everywhere to every intention. It introduce men into thinking and believing they have the right to do the same and when they do it is really damaging to women.

Oppression is not only through gender roles but as well class levels, society has always impanelment the need of having money and having connections.