Unit 2 Proposal

For my Unit 2 proposal, I will like to focus on one of the most infamous events to occur in Mexico, the disappearance of 43 Ayotzinapa Normal School students on September 26, 2014. This event has left many families angry at the Mexican government because as of today, they are still not found and are blaming the very government for being responsible for it. I remember the first time watching and hearing this on TV in 2014 and found it disturbing that such an event happened. My family comes from Mexico and feel that it is no surprise that the Mexican government chooses not to solve this action, given to possible corruption in the government.

As I was searching more information on this event, I came across images such as photos, paintings, and other form of arts like banners done by a group of Mexican artists. According to the short bog post, the banners are there to serve against ” a climate of fear surrounding protests in the wake of kidnapping”. There have been cases of protests against the government and the fear of retaliation. Some of the art also serves as a form of inspiration and hope that one day these students will reappear alive and well.

Terms to Research

Ayotzinapa

43 students

Fear of Protest

Police Violence

Mexican Artists Resurrect Ayotzinapa 43 in Protest Art

Mexican Artists Resurrect Ayotzinapa 43 in Protest Art

Missing Students in Mexico Have Inspired a Wave of Protest Art

https://www.vice.com/en/article/5gk4xb/the-missing-43-ayotzinapa-students-have-inspired-new-protest-art-in-mexico-456

Chilean Arpilleras

After reading and watching the arpilleras of Chile, it is really interesting how a work of art can be so powerful in trying to bring a social change to a country. What is a an Arpillera? It is a form of artistic protest that dated back to the years of Augustin Pinochet, a dictator in Chile who ruled from 1973-1990 after the previous government was taken over. What makes those Arpilleras so powerful is that from the video, they show scenes of events that has happened during Pinochet’s rule and showing the outsiders what life is like in Chile. This also alarmed the United Nations on the human rights being violated.The dictatorship of Pinochet was not so great as many of the women’s family have been either disappeared or killed by the government. I never knew about this type of artistic protest.

According to the article on contemporary use of embroidery as protest art, Arpilleras has resurfaced in attempts to bring positive social change to Chile. In the article, readers are told that In October 2019, high school students took to the streets to protest against subway fare increase. As time went by, protesters also use this as an opportunity to call for an economic reform and for new constitution to replace the 1980 one as that one was written during the Pinochet regime. The Chilean women that have protested became victims of police abuse, much like in other countries such as the U.S. where protesters suffer police violence. The protesters used embroidery to show how they had suffered and , many of them got their eyes injured or lost an eye as a result of the violence. Therefore, a 23 foot long tapestry titled “Embroider you Eyes” was created to show the many eyes injured or lost in the protests and to show what police were doing against protesters.

It is interesting how the effects of the Pinochet regime are still present in modern day Chile as the example of the Constitution is an example of it. The protesters saw this an opportunity to further bring change to their country where there are still many missing family members and the new generation of women are becoming more active.

https://theworld.org/stories/2020-02-21/chile-women-use-traditional-embroidery-urge-political-change

Rewriting History

In the last few years, there has been widespread protest in removing Confederate statues to stop celebrating figures who supported not just breaking away from the U.S. but also keeping slavery. These statues are mostly located in the southern states of the U.S. and were also part of the Confederate States during the Civil War. Although I do agree that these figures should not be celebrated and statues brought down but I also believe they should not be erase from history to show people that this actually happened.

Much like today with the Christopher Columbus statues where there has been protest to be taken because it represent a racial and violent history to the treatment of indigenous people in the Americas. There are others who refused to have them taken down because the statue has been associated with culture and a sense of heritage, much like the Confederate statues. I do not think we do not see much of the civil rights leaders such as MLK, Rosa Parks to other historical figures like Harriet Tubman to celebrate their accomplishments in bringing a better change to society. Recently, a statue was taken down near Central Park of James Marion Sims. According to a BBC article, Sims was described as the “father of genecology” who performed medical experiments on enslaved black women without using any anesthetics. This statue was labelled as a symbol hate and was therefore taken down.

It was a very interesting read, especially now we are seeing more action and protest taken to remove any statue that represents the darkest history of the U.S. This history should not be celebrated but should be taught in schools to show students the whole history of the country and not “white wash” any part of history.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43804725

Special Languages — David

What is a language? It is the way we communicate with each other and is another way to identify each other. When we speak a language, other people will question our background and where we come from. There are many authors who have done research and discuss the ways languages create and identify groups by inclusion and exclusion. I have observed this in my life because of my heritage and the languages I speak, which are English and Spanish. I will use Gloria Anzaldua’s “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” from Borderlands/La Frontera as I can relate to her story because I am also of Mexican heritage and the languages spoken. If someone were to be born of the same heritage, it is expected that you learn the Spanish language and speak to be able to communicate with family members or others who can speak only Spanish.

My experience with the languages has been different to that of Anzaldua because I started speaking English and have always read, written, and listened in the same language. I do not think I ever took a class or learned any other languages in school. I started to learn how to speak Spanish at home because of my mother. At home, I speak only Spanish with my mother as she cannot communicate in English. My Spanish is not great so I try my best to communicate with her so she can understand me. My family, like Anzaldua’s mother, told her that “I want you to speak English. Pa’ hallar buen trabajo tienes que saber hablar el Ingles bien. Que vale todo tu educación si todavía hablas ingles con un ‘accent’” (Anzaldúa,.34.) My family believes that by speaking English, one can be successful in the United States because you can speak with many people and can get a job for it. I do not think I experienced Anzaldua’s story of learning to speak English, but my older brother has because English is his second language. My brother and I both can speak English but have different experiences learning the language as English is his second language and for me it is my first.

 Growing up, my brother has told me stories of taking ESL (English as a Second Language) classes, being told many times to improve his English by reading and writing in the language and has been made fun of because he had a “Mexican accent”. What makes it interesting is that both of us were born in New York, yet he learns how to speak Spanish first. He started taking ESL classes and was mostly put in Bilingual classes to be able to understand both languages. Those ESL classes did not end for him until he got to high school. After he got to high school, it did not stop there because his English teacher was informed of his ESL experience and was told the same thing to keep improving his English. I remember a story he told me once that he had to make a presentation about his internship to a sophomore class and at the end, his classmate commented how he spoke in a “Mexican accent”. The experience made him feel excluded because he felt uncomfortable speaking the language and receive comments on his speaking. I also feel excluded not because of my English but my Spanish and feel the same as Anzaldua who feels like a “Pocho, cultural traitor” for speaking mostly English and not speaking Spanish well.

When I speak Spanish, I get corrected a lot of times because I cannot be understood and sometimes it makes me feel a bit embarrassed. There are times where I cannot say several words in Spanish that my brother must translate for me. Although I do not speak the language with friends, I still must learn the language to be able to communicate at home. In Anzaldua’s section in the reading “Linguistic Terrorism”, for Chicanas such as herself, are scared because they will be shamed for the way they speak Spanish and get told they are not speaking it right. I agree with Anzaldua’s statement that “repeated attacks on our native tongue diminish our sense of self. The attacks continue throughout our lives” (Anzaldua, 39.) You can say that there are attacks on our heritage because of the language we belong to and feel insulted for trying to speak it or for not speaking it. I agree with Anzaldua that for those who are afraid that others will call them “agringadas” because those who speaking English are unable to speak Chicano Spanish. I feel that it is already happening with people who come from immigrant families in the United States. Spanish speaking households will come to believe that it will be best for their children to grow up learning the English language to avoid being criticize in U.S. society. Anzaldua brings up an important detail that “by the end of this century, English, not Spanish, will be the mother tongue of most Chicanos and Latinos” (Anzaldua, 39.) Chicanos and Latinos will grow to speak English to be able to better communicate and be successful in life but at the same time, will suffer because they feel shamed from coming from a Spanish speaking household.

Language is a powerful tool to communicate with other people that it will lead to inclusion and exclusion. The heritage of one can affect how they will be seen in U.S. society where it is taught that English should be used to communicate everywhere. Anzaldua’s work is a great example to use to explain how those who speak other languages other than English are facing challenges to be accepted by others by learning and speaking English but at the same time, rejected for the same reason by those in our heritage.

Works Cited:

Anzaldua, Gloria. “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”. Borderlands/La Frontera (p. 33-45)