In my opinion I think offensive language in literature should remain unchanged because it provides an honest reflection of the time period, capturing the historical realities, social norms, and ideologies that were present. Although such language can be deeply uncomfortable to read, it plays a vital role in portraying how people communicated and thought during that era. It can also help modern readers recognize that, unfortunately, some of those beliefs still exist today.By censoring this type of language, we risk dulling the story’s emotional and historical impact, and we lose valuable insight into the characters their values, attitudes, and behaviors. However, I also believe that authors need to be thoughtful about how and when they use such language. Context matters. There’s a difference between using offensive words to reflect historical truth or character development and using them in ways that feel unnecessary or offensive without purpose. Authors should ensure that their use of language is meaningful and not simply provocative or disrespectful.
Luis 0 Ramirez
Over the past two weeks, I’ve noticed an improvement in my ability to read and interpret poetry. Although poetry still poses challenges, I’ve found that taking time to reflect helps me uncover deeper meanings. This skill is particularly useful when reading plays like Oedipus the King, as both poetry and drama often communicate through hidden messages that require thoughtful analysis. One poem we’ve studied, “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” by Robert Frost, parallels the themes found in Oedipus the King. In Frost’s poem, the speaker pauses in the quiet beauty of the woods but ultimately acknowledges he has responsibilities that compel him onward. Similarly, Oedipus is on a relentless journey, driven forward despite his desire to pause or escape. Both Frost’s speaker and Oedipus grapple with the tension between personal desires and obligations, illustrating how fate and duty profoundly influence human lives. Oedipus the King is Robert Frost’s “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening.” In Frost’s poem, the narrator feels drawn to the peaceful solitude of the dark woods yet ultimately decides to continue onward. This parallels Oedipus’ journey, as he too encounters the temptation of staying in ignorance remaining metaphorically in the dark—but instead pushes forward to uncover the painful truth of his past, despite knowing it may destroy him.
My essay was a valuable learning experience, and I gained important insights into writing. I discovered numerous ways to enhance my work, including the importance of closely following instructions and staying focused on the main topic. One key takeaway was the necessity of being specific and incorporating quotations correctly. I also realized how crucial vocabulary and grammar are, especially when transitioning between ideas to maintain clarity and flow. Based on the feedback I received, I’ve realized several areas where I can improve my writing. One major issue was my introduction—it did not properly introduce the title and author of the story and article, which is essential for clarity. Additionally, I need to ensure that I fully understand and respond to the assignment prompt. Instead of addressing the task correctly, I misrepresented the argument of the Rader article, which shows that I need to analyze sources more carefully before writing about them. Another key area for improvement is clarity and specificity in my language. My feedback contained vague statements that did not clearly explain my points. Moving forward, I will be more precise by identifying specific background information and evidence rather than making broad, unclear statements. Formatting is another aspect I need to work on. I overlooked discussing the student’s formatting and also need to review MLA style for my own work. This will help ensure my citations and overall structure meet academic standards. while my essay had some strengths, I recognize that I need to refine my thesis, improve my clarity, and pay closer attention to both content and formatting. I will use this feedback to strengthen my future writing and produce more polished, well-structured essays. I put in my best effort, but I also acknowledge that there is always room for improvement. Moving forward, I will apply what I […]
After reading Toni Cade Bambara, I was struck by Sylvia’s complex response to the world around her. She carries an intense resentment toward Miss Moore, not just for the lesson she’s teaching, but for disrupting the comfortable ignorance that shields her from fully acknowledging economic inequality. Sylvia’s defensive and judgmental nature seems like a coping mechanism, a way to deflect the discomfort of realizing the systemic forces that keep her and her peers in a cycle of poverty. Rather than directly engaging with the lesson, she chooses to focus on the personal gain she managed to extract from the day—Miss Moore’s money. This irony reveals the tension between her disdain for wealth and her own desire for it. If I were to explore this theme in an essay, I might title it Sylvia’s Defiance: Between Awareness and Denial. Ultimately, her refusal to discuss the lesson outright suggests that, despite her resistance, Miss Moore’s words have left an impression she isn’t yet willing to admit.
Hello, my name is Luis. I am 20 years old, and I play baseball at BMCC. I’m from Brooklyn and have a strong passion for the game. Baseball has been a big part of my life, and playing at BMCC allows me to compete at a high level while also focusing on my studies. I enjoy staying active, training, and working on improving my skills on the field. Outside of baseball, I like spending time with friends, exploring the city, and finding good spots to eat. Whether I’m on the field or off, I’m always looking for ways to grow and push myself to be better.
The prewriting assignment in Week 1, Activity 10 requires us to write a thesis-driven essay, meaning the entire essay must be structured around a central claim that is supported with evidence and analysis. This assignment focuses on Dean Rader’s “Overview of ‘The Most Handsomest Drowned Man’” and one of the ideas he presents about Gabriel García Márquez’s short story, “The Most Handsome Drowned Man in the World.” Our task is to engage with Rader’s interpretation, critically analyze his perspective, and develop our own argument in response. The prewriting project allows us to organize our thoughts, construct a solid argument, and receive feedback before producing a final piece. By going through this process, we may revise our argument, increase our supporting evidence, and improve the overall clarity of our writing. Prewriting also allows us to uncover flaws, such as unclear reasoning or structural faults, that we might not have spotted on our own. This process enables us to rewrite and create a more polished and powerful essay. It also motivates us to arrange and structure our ideas more efficiently, resulting in a well-organized and persuasive final document. Finally, prewriting helps us become more confident and competent writers by allowing us to revise and improve our work through feedback.
