I believe that, in most cases, literary texts should retain the original language to preserve the historical context and authenticity of the characters. When a story is set in a particular time and place, the language used by the characters often reflects their beliefs, societal norms, and the struggles of that period. In the case of Flannery O’Connor’s writing, the offensive language might be uncomfortable, but it’s important because it shows the attitudes and realities of the time in the deep South during the 1960s. That said, it’s also crucial to handle these texts with care. Readers should be given context and guidance about why certain words were used, to avoid misunderstanding or misinterpretation. Educators and publishers can offer resources that help explain the social and historical background, so the language isn’t just seen as offensive, but as part of the broader discussion about race, power, and history. The balance is to respect the original work while also being mindful of its impact on modern readers.
Powered by:
top
One thought on “Discussion Week 9: Brian Gomez”
I can agree that most literary texts should keep the original language to make the time period and character more authentic. When it comes to stories set in specific times and places, the language demonstrates to readers the beliefs and struggles during that time. In Flannery O’Connor’s work, while the offensive language may be uncomfortable, it’s important to show the attitudes and mindsets of people during the 1960s in the South. It’s also essential to give readers context, so they understand why certain words are used. The key is balancing respect for the original work with care for modern readers.