In my opinion, literature should preserve its authentic language, particularly when reflecting historical context and characterization. However, educators must provide disclaimers and trigger warnings, especially for students whose ancestors have faced oppression. Rather than censoring texts, they should explain the origins and significance of such language, helping students understand its historical impact and why certain terms should not be used casually or repeated verbatim.
Classrooms should foster a respectful and inclusive environment where students feel comfortable discussing sensitive topics. By addressing offensive language thoughtfully, educators can encourage critical thinking while ensuring that literature remains a tool for learning, not harm. This balance allows for meaningful discussions while respecting those affected by historical oppression, ensuring that all students can engage with literature in an informed and thoughtful manner.
As I pursue my education with motivation and optimism, I was disheartened to encounter the derogatory term “nappy-headed bitch” in “The lesson.” While this language reflects a particular historical context, it left me feeling uncomfortable, especially as I did not expect to confront such language in an academic setting. It prompted me to wonder whether students at prestigious institutions such as Princeton, Yale, Harvard, and Notre Dame are similarly exposed to such language in their curricula. Where are the texts that uplift and inspire, rather than perpetuate ignorance and division?
While engaging with literature that reflects historical realities is essential, it is equally important to include works that empower and foster understanding without resorting to harmful language. For me, encountering such language was a cultural shock, as it is an unacceptable form of speech within my diverse social circle. This type of language does nothing to propel society forward. The usage of such terms adds no substance to our lives nor aligns us toward prosperity. I believe that it is crucial to challenge and evolve beyond such language, fostering more respectful and inclusive discussions in literature and beyond.
