I think literary texts should keep their original language, even if it includes offensive words, because it preserves historical context and the author’s intent. Writers like Flannery O’Connor used specific language to reflect the time and place they were writing about, and altering it can water down the reality of that era. While some words are offensive today, censoring them might make it harder to fully grasp the social and racial tensions of the time. That being said, there should be discussions around these words so readers understand their impact without normalizing them. If a school or platform chooses to censor certain terms, it should come with an explanation rather than just erasing history in my opinion. Part of literature is meant to challenge readers alongside education, and keeping the original language helps us engage with it critically. Instead of removing words, we should use them as opportunities for meaningful discussions about history and progress.
Powered by:
top
One thought on “Wesley Graham Discussion 9”
I agree that discussions around offensive language are essential for helping readers understand its impact, I believe there needs to be appropriate preparation for such controversial topics. Instead of censoring, we should use these words as opportunities for critical conversations about history, progress, and societal change. By engaging with the language thoughtfully, we can promote awareness and create space for deeper understanding without erasing the historical context in which these words were used. This approach fosters education and encourages responsible dialogue.
It’s similar to how the Confederate flag is interpreted differently by people. For some, it symbolizes historical trauma, representing generations of suffering and systemic oppression on marginalized communities. For others, it may reflect regional pride or patriotism. The challenge lies in recognizing both perspectives—acknowledging its historical significance while being sensitive to the harm it causes. Both viewpoints are valid within their contexts, but it’s essential to approach such symbols with care and respect for the experiences they represent.