I believe that offensive language in literature should be kept in its original form because it reflects the time period and the realities of the time as well as social beliefs and ideologies that were held during that era. While the words are very uncomfortable to read, they do serve a purpose in showing how people thought and spoke during that time in history, and they might give us a perspective on how some people still hold similar beliefs. Censoring these words risks erasing or softening the impact of the story and it would also prevent the reader from really getting information about the character’s characteristics and beliefs. But I do believe authors should be cautious of the settings and different situations in which these words are being used in their stories to avoid the shift between useful information about history and characteristics and turning into a distasteful use of a very hurtful word with no good reasoning behind it.
Daily Archives: March 28, 2025
I think that literary works should keep their original language because it keeps the work’s validity and gives us a clear picture of history. Words used by writers like Flannery O’Connor in their stories showed how people really thought and felt at that time, including prejudices and social attitudes. If you change their words, it can change the historical background and make the story less powerful. By sticking to the original language, readers can get into the text the way it was meant to be read and have deep conversations about the ideas it offers. Some words are insulting now, but they help us remember the past and see how language and society have changed over time. We shouldn’t limit literature; instead, we should use it as a chance to think about, study, and learn from the past. But I also know that some people might find some of the words I use offensive. In school settings, content warnings or led talks can help set the scene while still protecting the original work’s integrity. Literature should push us, even if it makes us feel bad because feeling bad can help us understand things better and think more critically.
i believe that although the language is offensive it should be kept inside of literary text to keep the authenticity due to historical context. The language is offensive and harmful but depending on the context, it is a reminder of history and why these terms shouldn’t be used now. i also think that keeping these slurs in literary texts helps individuals have the uncomfortable but important conversation about issues related to hate, prejudice, and discrimination. i also understand people wont agree but i believe hiding the offense langue does not change the fact that it was said. i politically believe that the censorship is a way to hide and not acknowledge the harm that was done in the past. The more we censor and hide, the more we forget.
I believe that literary texts should be kept as they were written, even if they include offensive terms. It is important for readers to understand the context and history behind them, as that allows for reflection on the past. Even if the language may be hard or harmful, removing it could reduce the impact of the text and weaken its message about the harmfulness of racism. These words, as uncomfortable as they may be, serve as a reminder of the injustices that have existed and continue to exist. Preserving the authenticity of the text helps us learn from history and not repeat the same mistakes. Although I understand why many people think otherwise, as it is a very hard and painful thing to do, confronting such language can be deeply unsettling, especially for those directly affected by its history. However, rather than erasing these words, we should use them as an opportunity for discussion, education, and awareness.
I don’t think it’s okay to keep racial slurs in literary texts, even if they are part of the historical context. These words, while they might reflect the time and place in which the story was written, still carry a lot of pain and harm. They can make it difficult for some readers to connect with the material or feel comfortable engaging with it. It’s true that understanding history and the issues of the past is important, but I believe there are other ways to show that history without using harmful language that can hurt people. There are many ways to express the prejudices and social problems of the past without causing harm or alienating readers today. We can still learn about the past, the prejudices, and the way society works without needing to keep language that has the potential to hurt people. The impact of these slurs should not be ignored. In the end, it’s about finding a balance—preserving the meaning and context of the text without causing unnecessary harm to those reading it today.
I think literary texts should keep their original language, even if it includes offensive words, because it preserves historical context and the author’s intent. Writers like Flannery O’Connor used specific language to reflect the time and place they were writing about, and altering it can water down the reality of that era. While some words are offensive today, censoring them might make it harder to fully grasp the social and racial tensions of the time. That being said, there should be discussions around these words so readers understand their impact without normalizing them. If a school or platform chooses to censor certain terms, it should come with an explanation rather than just erasing history in my opinion. Part of literature is meant to challenge readers alongside education, and keeping the original language helps us engage with it critically. Instead of removing words, we should use them as opportunities for meaningful discussions about history and progress.
