Upon my initial reading of the story, I was taken aback by Mathilde and her husband’s extraordinary efforts to replace their misplaced necklace. It seemed unfathomable that they would choose to live in destitution for ten years simply to pay off this debt. As a result, I felt both shocked and empathetic towards these characters who were struggling with repayment. What added another layer of complexity was when it was eventually revealed that the original piece itself had been nothing more than an imitation – as Madame Forestier herself stated: “Oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs!” This revelation left me feeling saddened at how easily avoidable all those twelve grueling years could have been on account of one mistake.
The shift in Mathilde’s character piqued my interest. Observing her progression from a conceited and covetous woman to someone more resilient and resourceful was gripping. It was impressive how she persisted in repaying the debt even when challenged by adversity, which inspired me greatly. Nevertheless, I found myself baffled as to why she did not immediately confess to Madame Forestier about losing the necklace at hand – it made me wonder if pride or anxiety played into her judgment-making process significantly. As you delve through this story, myriad emotions will surface- ranging from awe-inspiring shock that could spark deep curiosity within oneself inducing thought-provoking conversation amongst peers making “The Necklace” quite an engaging read overall!
One thought on “Ihab Gomaa Week 9 Discussion”
I like how you said This led you to wonder whether pride or fear played a large role in her decision-making.