Poetry in general is pretty boring to me, in this form. The language sometimes is doing too much, and I don’t like how a lot of these writers and authors back then used the overly flowery language and eluded to everything, though I understand that the time period had that language normalized. I appreciate straightforward writing that gets to the point and says what it is trying to say. In no way am I trying to take away from the impressiveness of these pieces and the skill that these writers possessed. The poems that I liked the best were the ones telling stories, the dramatic genre, the love poems and the other sonnets were kind of boring and sappy, which I guess is the point. My Last Duchess was an interesting story though, the only thing about it that kind of turned me away was the way the text is structured.
One thought on “Discussion 4”
Juwaan, thanks for the thoughtful and candid remarks. I understand where you are coming from. I’m not crazy about the love poems either, and it’s funny what you write about how being sappy is the point. I also share a real admiration for writing that is clear and direct. The famous writer Raymond Carver once wrote about his admiration for clear, precise, “commonplace” language. Did you notice that “My Last Duchess” is completely written in couplets (two rhyming lines) but you don’t hear the rhyme because of the enjambment?