Summary
Burden of proof
Definition -burden of proof, which is the need to provide evidence in support of their claims or charges. It specifies the level of evidence needed to convince the jury or judge that the other party's viewpoint is valid.
Example - When someone is charged with stealing, it is the prosecution's job to provide enough proof—such as witness accounts or tangible evidence—to persuade the jury or judge that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Explanation-The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a theft case; they must present evidence that proves the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge or jury. This could be in the form of physical evidence or witness accounts that connect the defendant to the theft.
One thought on “Fallacies: Conversation #7”
This fallacy is a legal system around the world. I do not understand how it can be a fallacy since in order to be guilty you have to show the proof of the guilt. I mean if it’s there, it may be for a reason. However by my understanding of , it ensures the logical validity of an argument.