by jasmarie bailey
All three articles talked about the civil fraud case of Donald Trump. The verdict was announced on Friday when a New York judge ordered Trump to pay nearly 355 million dollars in the civil fraud case. The facts that were included in all three stories were Donald Trump was ordered to pay nearly 355 million dollars with interest which can total up to 450 million dollars, trump was barred for 3 years from serving in top roles of any New York company, trump’s adult sons are also ordered to pay more than 4 million each since it is to believe that they were in on the fraud with their father and they are also barred from serving in any New York corporation for two years, how the judge installed an independent monitor to oversee trump’s business would continue to operate for three years I know he was upset about that. One news source has way more facts than the other two. It was from the right that they went into more depth about the civil fraud case with the evidence and how Trump acted during the court hearing, how he was “attacking” the judge and throwing a tantrum about how everybody was against him. For each article, the word choice I would say is leading a bit because they did put comments that the judge made and talked about other cases like the sexual abuse case on writer E Jean Carroll in 1996 I guess to show that Trump is not a good person I mean everybody knew that he isn’t good but to show that he has got away with a lot worse and if he weren’t caught he would have continued to do more harm. I do not think there was any bias in either article they all share the same opinion on Trump that he isn’t a good person
One thought on “conversation #3”
I completely agree, it is shown to society that Trump isn’t a good person and it is acknowledged by many people. However, most importantly he has gotten away with a lot worse and has escaped accountability for his actions many times. If he had not been exposed to the public he would have likely caused more harm and even scammed more money.