Summary
I chose the article Senators introducing ban TikTok. This article interested me as it has been going on since if not mistaken covid. The story is about a new bill backed by the White House that would give the administration new powers to ban Chinese-owned video app TikTok and other foreign-based technologies if they pose national security threats. The bill would allow the Commerce Department to impose restrictions, including banning TikTok and other technologies that endanger national security risks.
All three stories reported on the White House's support for a Senate bill that would give the government new power to ban TikTok and other foreign-based Technologie. They also mentioned that the bill would give the Commerce Department the ability to impose restrictions up to and including banning TikTok and it would apply to foreign technologies from China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba.
The sources have different perspectives and biases, which can lead them to different aspects of the story and present different sets of facts. They may also have access to different sources of information, which can result in differences in the details they report. And their sources may have different standards for reporting, and which can influence the types of facts and details they include in the coverage. All three articles used formal language to present the story.
