Fu Qi Zhang Cen Conv 3

This story looks at the potential of the US government to ban gas stoves as a way to reduce air pollution. The facts included in all three stories were: that cities like San Francisco and Berkeley were considering banning gas stoves; that competing sources of energy like electric and induction were seen as potential replacements; that levels of air pollution may be reduced by ban gas stoves.

Right-rated media framed the idea as an environmental effort by activists in the name of eliminating fossil fuels. Left-rated media focused more on addressing environmental concerns around gas stoves. Center-rated media reported on reactions from both sides of the issue—those individuals who see a ban as necessary for greater public health and those who see it as an unfair burden or another example of government overreach.

The language used in all three stories reflected a neutral tone overall but there were subtle signs of bias towards one viewpoint or another. For example, left-rated media used “gas stoves are unhealthy ” to describe the gas stoves, but right-rated media referred to ban gas stoves as  “Green groups align to push all-electric stoves”, This can be seen as an example of in-group bias since it unfairly favors those who belong to your group.

source —– https://www.allsides.com/story/facts-and-fact-checking-government-trying-ban-gas-stoves

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 100 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

2 thoughts on “Fu Qi Zhang Cen Conv 3”