Josué Robinson Conversation 1

Summary

Critical thinking is a complex definition, but in general terms, it is the objective and empirical analysis to form a judgment. As a discipline, it seeks to conceptualize, apply, analyze, synthesize, and skillfully evaluate the information generated by observation, experience, and reflection as guides for belief and action.

I initially disagreed with Gary Meegan when he started comparing critical thinking to art until I could internalize his explanation. As an amateur artist (I like to paint and draw), I need some skills to conceptualize my vision, which requires effort, work, and observation. Similar skills that Meegan points out as necessary to develop skillful critical thinking. On the other hand, I find it curious what Jesse Richardson says, who sees critical thinking as more than an art; he sees it as a design that solves problems and thrives on creativity. But art, from the artist's point of view, does solve something in the way the artist feels is the most creative way. Just like art, critical thinking allows us to analyze and see the world from different visions and perspectives. Both agree that it is necessary to evaluate the information received and that it must be taken with caution. Meegan tells us, that to ensure the reliability of a specific person's opinion, it is important to analyze the data on which it is based. While Richardson goes further when it reminds us that we must self-evaluate because we have prejudices, experiences, and ways of seeing life that shapes our thinking and critical analysis.

Both opinions make sense and complement each other to give us a more comprehensive vision of critical thinking or what it should aspire to be. Understanding this concept, internalizing it, and applying it helps people rationalize and express opinions and criticism in a concrete, thoughtful and effective way, even when there is a diversity of criteria.

4 thoughts on “Josué Robinson Conversation 1”

Comments are closed.