Essay Outline
Part 1/ Introduction
My essay analyses one of the most famous literacy tests given in the 1960s. This test was given to potential black voters to deem them worthy or unworthy of voting.
I asked 5 adults from five different backgrounds to take the test without knowledge of what the test was for, followed by the question, “how did you feel while taking the test”. Afterwards, I informed them of the reality of the test they are taking and asked them to then tell me how they felt about the test.
I personally knew nothing of these literacy tests and found them really fascinating and also completely unjust and unfair. I thought it would be a good experiment to see if different demographics would approach the test with different perspectives and also wanted to see how their genuine reactions were after being informed of why the test exists.
Part 2
Participants
- Test taking time.
- Feelings before being informed.
- Feelings after being informed.
- White Female, Born in the US, 59 years old.
- 15 minutes
- Felt strongly that language/words are important and should be precise, to convey what the speaker wants, or the action is clear to the reader and test taker.
- Felt that it would be difficult for anyone to pass this test within the ten-minute time frame. Definitely reflected on the time that this test was given, and the possible educational disadvantages already put in place for black people.
- White Female, Born in France, 58 years old.
- 9 minutes
- Felt challenged to make sure she read carefully without falling into a trap. Felt tired at the end of test, but happy she got most of the questions right.
- She discussed the differences in American education as opposed to French education, felt confused why this test would be given as a disadvantage when she was taught things of this nature and was always given warning to read carefully.
- Black Male, Born in the US, 42 years old.
- 20 minutes
- This participant had already known of this test and had taken it previously, he said this instance and the last he felt incompetent, less than, frustrated, upset and angry. He said that knowing what the test was used for created a distraction that caused him to sit in his emotions and not want to take it at all.
- White Male, Born in the US, 35 years old.
- 6 minutes
- Felt challenged and like he was being tricked.
- His demeanor changed and he said he felt at a loss as to what to say afterwards.
- Indian Female, Born in the US, 28 years old.
- 10 minutes
- Felt excited because it felt like a puzzle to her, she did feel challenged and at times confused by the wording.
- She suspected as she had heard of these kinds of tests in college classes. She felt sadness and frustration that this was a determining factor of someone’s ability to make important decisions.
Link containing test:
Can You Pass This Voting Literacy Test Made to Disenfranchise Blacks? (allthatsinteresting.com)
Part 3:
I believe this project is more of a hegemonic nature. It represents a ruling class trying to take rights from a group of people.
Part 4:
It was serendipitous that our focus last week included this very subject. The further material definitely expanded my knowledge on this.
The Richard Wright Library Card video really added to the literacy struggles facing the black community in his time as a teenager. He himself might have taken one of these literacy tests to make him a potential voter.
Part 5:
We should absolutely care about this subject. It encompasses so much of what we’ve learned in this course and shows such a pivotal struggle of a marginalized group. To see perspectives of different people with different backgrounds really just shows how these literacy tests could truly effect anyone. I myself took it and rushed through it for fear of not making the time limit and I failed miserably.
3 thoughts on “Essay Outline”
I think you work looks very great so far with ur ideas . Did you just interview fandoms or people you knew ? Did you take the test too?
1. Purpose of essay: Analyze literacy test from 1960 used to prohibit Black individuals from voting
2. Essay choice: Option 5
3. Research Methods: Proctored exam to several individuals
4. Central idea: Regardless of background, these kinds of biases designed to affect one group can affect everybody
5. Relevant Evidence: Exam results & reactions from several individuals.
6. Interpretation of RE: Not much beyond reactionary response/summary
7. Course Material Reference: Richard Wright Library card video
8. Hegemonic or counternarrative discourse: hegemonic
9. Strengths: Has an amazing grander idea that can be pushed farther, in which some literature I’ve read outside of class examines in a much larger way, and is an amazing backbone for an essay
10. Other comments or suggestions: Biggest suggestion is adding further interpretation of research beyond summarization
In your draft, you did a great job of clearly stating the purpose of your essay. You want to analyze this famous literacy test from the 1960s and see how different people approached it. It’s really interesting how you even conducted an experiment to see how participants reacted after finding out the truth about the test. I think that’s a great way to dig into the test’s impact and fairness.
But I noticed that you didn’t mention which essay option you chose. It might be helpful to mention that so the reader knows which specific aspect of the test you’re focusing on.
I also liked how you conducted an experiment with five adults taking the test without knowing its true purpose. That gives some firsthand insights into how different folks engage with the test.
The main idea of your essay is all about analyzing the literacy test and exploring whether it’s fair or not. I think it’s great how you’re looking at how people from different backgrounds tackled the test and what they thought after learning the truth.
To support your main idea, you describe the experiences and perspectives of three participants. That evidence really helps paint a picture of how different people interacted with the test.
In terms of interpreting the evidence, it’s clear that you find the literacy tests fascinating but also think they’re unjust and unfair. That shows you’re thinking critically about the test and its impact.
You didn’t mention any specific course materials in the intro, but since you mentioned doing research and experimenting, it’s likely you’re using external sources to support your analysis.
As for the fancy words like “hegemonic” and “counternarrative discourse,” you didn’t mention them in the intro. But since you’re exploring the impact and fairness of the literacy test, you might touch on counternarratives by highlighting how unfair the test was.
Overall, your draft is looking pretty solid! Just remember to mention the essay option you chose and consider referencing some course materials.