- The role of citizens in government varies among the federal, confederation, and unitary systems. Each system distributes political power differently. In a federal system, citizens participate in multiple layers of government local, state, and national. Power is by constitution divided. Kelly explains that federalism means “the central government does not control all the power in the nation. States also have powers reserved to them” (Kelly). This structure gives citizens more points of access. Citizens vote for state legislators, governors, members of Congress, and the president. So, they can influence policy at each level. In a confederation system, national government is weak, and most power rests with the states. Citizens primarily engage with their state governments because the central authority cannot act directly on individuals. While under the Articles of Confederation, national government could not tax or regulate citizens directly. It had to work through the states. In a unitary system, citizens interact mainly with the national government because authority is centralized. Local governments exist only if the national government allows them to. Unlike in federalism where power is intentionally divided to prevent tyranny. The unitary systems concentrate power, reducing the number of political arenas in which citizens can participate. The federal systems encourage broad citizen involvement across multiple levels, confederations limit national influence over citizens, and unitary systems streamline participation toward a single central authority.
- The division of power refers to the constitutional arrangement that distributes authority among different branches and levels of government to prevent any single entity from becoming too powerful. In the United States, this includes both separation of powers and federalism. Kelly describes separation of powers as the system in which “the US Government is divided into three branches so that no one branch has all the power.” Each with its own function making, executing, and interpreting laws (Kelly). This prevents the concentration of authority within the federal government itself. At the same time, federalism divides power between the national and state governments. As Kelly states that federalism ensures that “states also have powers reserved to them,” meaning the federal government cannot control all policy areas (Kelly). This dual structure is reinforced by checks and balances. It allows each branch to limit the others. For example, “the president can veto legislation” and “the Supreme Court can declare acts of Congress unconstitutional” (Kelly). Together, these branches create a system in which power is intentionally fragmented to protect popular sovereignty and prevent abuses. The division of power is not just structural. It is a safeguard for citizens. Its to help ensuring that government remains accountable and limited.
- The federal government shapes state and local actions through grants, mandates, and regulatory authority, all of which became especially visible during the COVID‑19 pandemic in New York. According to Krutz and Waskiewicz, federal grants. Especially categorical grants, limit state discretion because they come with “strict administrative criteria that guide project selection, performance, and financial oversight” (Krutz and Waskiewicz). During COVID‑19, New York relied heavily on federal funding through programs such as FEMA reimbursements, CARES Act relief, and enhanced Medicaid funding. The OpenStax text notes that Medicaid alone represents more than half of federal grant spending, and federal health‑care grants increased dramatically from $43.8 billion in 1990 to $320 billion in 2014 showing how dependent states are on federal health funding (Krutz and Waskiewicz). New York’s pandemic response, including hospital capacity expansion and testing programs, depended on these federal funds. The federal government also influences states through mandates, which require compliance in exchange for funding. As the text explains, crosscutting mandates allow the federal government to “withhold federal grants” if states fail to meet requirements (Krutz and Waskiewicz). During COVID‑19, New York had to follow federal public‑health guidelines to receive certain emergency funds and supplies. The federal government sets standards, but states implement them shaped New York’s pandemic policies. Like how the Clean Air Act sets national standards but leaves enforcement to states. Federal guidance on vaccines, travel restrictions, and workplace safety created a national framework that New York had to integrate into its own policies. The pandemic highlighted how federal tools funding, mandates, and regulatory authority directly shape state and local government actions, especially in times of crisis.
Kelly, Martin. “The 6 Core Principles behind the US Government.” ThoughtCo.com, ThoughtCo, 2019, www.thoughtco.com/overview-united-states-government-politics-104673.
Krutz, Glen, and Sylvie Waskiewicz. “3.3 Intergovernmental Relationships – American Government 4e | OpenStax.” Openstax.org, OpenStax, 23 July 2025, openstax.org/books/american-government-4e/pages/3-3-intergovernmental-relationships?message=retired.
—. “3.4 Competitive Federalism Today – American Government 4e | OpenStax.” Openstax.org, OpenStax, 2025, openstax.org/books/american-government-4e/pages/3-4-competitive-federalism-today?message=retired.
—. “3.5 Advantages and Disadvantages of Federalism – American Government 4e | OpenStax.” Openstax.org, OpenStax, 23 July 2025, openstax.org/books/american-government-4e/pages/3-5-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-federalism?message=retired.
—. “Introduction – American Government 2e – OpenStax.” Openstax.org, OpenStax, 23 July 2025, openstax.org/books/american-government-2e/pages/3-introduction.
Ted-Ed. “How Is Power Divided in the United States Government? – Belinda Stutzman.” YouTube, 12 Apr. 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuFR5XBYLfU.