1. Michelle Alexander claims the main explanation for why so many people are sent to jail in the U.S today is due to the government’s genocidal plan to bring into poor black communities the War on Drugs. She mentions [“Almost overnight, the media was saturated with images of black “crack whores,” “crack dealers,” and “crack babies”—images that seemed to confirm the worst negative racial stereotypes about impoverished inner-city residents.] [“President Ronald Reagan officially announced the current drug war in 1982, before crack became an issue in the media or a crisis in poor black neighborhoods]. These 2 examples back up her point where the government wanted a control over the way people viewed poor communities.
2. Racial disparities in incarcerations cannot be explained by drug crime rates because studies show that people of all races use and sell drugs at a similar rate. Michelle points that if drug crimes were the cause, then the prison numbers would look equal, but they do not. In the article it states the disparities coming from enforcement patterns, policing practices, and choices of policy.
3. To me, when I read this means the U.S. uses its prison system to control black and brown lives on a level that no other country has ever done. It’s not about a punishment for the crime you committed, but it’s a whole system that limits people’s opportunities, rights, and freedom long after they leave prison.

1. Michelle Alexander argues that the main reason so many people are in jail in the United States today is not simply because of crime or the crack epidemic like most people believe. She explains that the War on Drugs actually started in 1982 before crack cocaine became a major issue, so it was not created as a response to it. She also points out how the media helped shape public opinion by focusing heavily on images of Black “crack users” and “drug dealers,” which made it seem like drug crime was mostly a Black inner city problem. According to her, this helped justify stricter drug laws and increased policing in those communities, even though drug use was happening across all races.
2. The racial disparities in incarceration cannot be explained by drug crime rates because research shows that people of different races use and sell drugs at very similar rates. In some cases, white people even have equal or higher rates of drug use. However, Black and Latino people are still arrested and sentenced at much higher rates. This shows that the issue is not about who is committing drug crimes, but more about how laws are enforced and which communities are being targeted by police and the justice system.
3. When Alexander says “the American penal system has emerged as a system of social control unparalleled in world history,” I understand her to mean that the prison system in the United States is not just about punishment, but also about controlling certain groups of people, especially poor communities of color. She is saying that the impact of incarceration goes beyond jail time because it affects people’s lives long term, like limiting job opportunities, housing, voting rights, and overall equality. The scale of this system and how it specifically impacts certain populations makes it very different from other countries.

1. M. Alexander points out that when President Reagan first declared the War on Drugs in 1982, crack cocaine had not yet emerged as an issue, nor had it become a crisis within poor communities. It was not until several years after the War on Drugs had been initiated that the drug began to become popular across the country. Therefore, the War on Drugs was proposed before the crack cocaine crisis, meaning it was not proposed to address the crisis. Furthermore, after the War on Drugs, the rate of illicit drug use declined, however, the number of people of color arrested for drug-related offenses actually increased. She also pointed out that the Reagan administration’s use of media propaganda to promote the War on Drugs led to negative stereotypes of poor communities. This means that government behavior cannot be viewed as “benign-efforts”. On the contrary, it has led to and deepened hostility towards specific communities. 
2. M. Alexander explains that the rates of drug use and trafficking among people of different racial backgrounds are remarkably similar. However, the rate at which Black people are charged and incarcerated for drug-related offenses is twenty to fifty times higher than that of White people. Therefore, racial disparities in incarceration rates cannot be explained by the rates of drug crimes themselves. This is more likely due to discrimination from law enforcement officers. 
3. According to M. Alexander’s argument, the American penal system became to not used to target crime. Instead, it has become a tool for the government to control public opinion. For example, drug use and drug trafficking are stereotypes about Black people, leading to a much higher incarceration rate in the United States than in other countries, and it resulted in a higher rate of Black people being incarcerated in the US than the regions under systems of racial apartheid. 

1. Alexander argues that the common belief that mass incarceration is mainly caused by rising crime rates is incorrect. She says that the huge growth of the prison population happened largely because of political choices, especially the War on Drugs, rather than because Americans suddenly became more criminal. To support this point, she explains that millions of people have been arrested and imprisoned for drug offenses, even though violent crime rates were not increasing at the same pace. She also points out that the United States imprisons a much larger percentage of its population than other countries and that this growth occurred after policies became tougher on drugs and sentencing. Her main argument is that the criminal justice system expanded because of laws and policies, not simply because of crime.

2. Alexander argues that racial disparities in incarceration cannot be explained by differences in drug use because studies show that people of different races use and sell illegal drugs at similar rates. In some cases, White people actually report higher rates of drug use. Despite this, Black and Latino communities are arrested, prosecuted, and imprisoned for drug offenses at much higher rates. 

3. I understand this phrase to mean that the U.S. prison system has become much more than a way to punish crime. Alexander believes it acts as a way of controlling certain groups of people, especially poor communities and communities of color. Because so many people are arrested, imprisoned, and then face barriers to jobs, housing, voting, and education after release, the effects extend far beyond prison itself. She calls it “unparalleled in world history” because no other country has incarcerated such a large portion of its population while creating such long-lasting consequences for people after they leave prison.

1. M. Alexander argues that the common explanation for mass incarceration, that it is driven by rising crime rates, particularly drug crime in Black communities, is simply wrong. She backs this up with several key points: First, President Reagan declared the War on Drugs in 1982, before crack cocaine even became a widespread street problem in minority communities (which emerged around 1985), meaning the policy was not actually a response to a drug crisis. Second, the Reagan administration actively worked with media outlets to publicize the emergence of crack cocaine as part of a strategic effort to build public and legislative support for the War on Drugs. This suggests the “crack crisis” was partly a manufactured panic used to justify policies that were already planned. Third, research shows that drug use rates are similar across racial groups, and white Americans were actually using drugs at higher rates in many cases, undermining the idea that Black communities were uniquely responsible for a drug epidemic. Finally, the rise in incarceration tracks deliberate political and legal decisions like mandatory minimums and targeted policing, not any real surge in criminal behaviour. Alexander’s broader point is that mass incarceration was built through conscious policy choices and strategic manipulation of public opinion, not as a natural response to crime.

2. Racial disparities in incarceration cannot be explained by drug crime rates because research shows that Black and white Americans use drugs at similar rates, with white American youths actually using drugs at higher rates in some cases. If incarceration were truly driven by drug crime, the numbers would reflect that reality across all racial groups. The disparity exists because of how the War on Drugs was enforced. Police were concentrated in Black neighborhoods, making arrests far more likely there, even though drug activity existed equally in white communities. White users in suburban areas faced little to no scrutiny. So the racial gap in prison populations reflects deliberate enforcement choices, not actual differences in who was committing drug offenses.

3. The phrase means that the American prison system has grown into something far beyond simply punishing crime. It has become a tool for controlling entire communities, particularly Black Americans, on a scale that no other country in history has matched. The word “unparalleled” is key. The U.S. incarcerates more people than any other nation, not because it has more crime, but because of deliberate policy choices that swept massive numbers of people, disproportionately Black, into the criminal justice system. Once caught in that system, people face consequences that extend far beyond their prison sentence, including loss of voting rights, exclusion from jobs and housing, and permanent second class citizenship. So the penal system does not just punish individuals, it controls and marginalizes entire populations by keeping them trapped in a cycle of legal disadvantage. In that sense it functions less like a justice system and more like a mechanism of social and racial control, which is exactly the parallel Alexander draws to systems like Jim Crow.

1. Michelle Alexander argues that the main explanation for the widespread mass incarceration in the United States is because Americans commit more crime, is incorrect. She demonstrates that mass incarceration is directly tied to the War on Drugs, not to rising crime rates. She writes that “the War on Drugs began at a time when illegal drug use was on the decline” (Alexander 6). This means the drug war was not a response to a drug crisis, it created a false justification. Alexander also emphasizes that President Reagan announced the drug war in 1982, “before crack became an issue in the media or a crisis in poor Black neighborhoods” (Alexander 5). The government then used media campaigns to exaggerate crack cocaine and justify harsh policing. As a result, drug convictions increased even though drug crime itself had not increased. Alexander explains that the U.S. prison population grew from “around 300,000 to more than 2 million” within thirty years, with drug convictions making up most of the increase (Alexander 6). Her evidence shows that mass incarceration is not driven by crime but by political choices and racially targeted drug policies.
2. Alexander stresses that racial disparities in incarceration have nothing to do with differences in drug use or drug selling. She cites studies showing that “people of all colors use and sell illegal drugs at remarkably similar rates” (Alexander 7). In fact, she notes that “white youth are more likely to engage in drug crime than people of color” (Alexander 7). Despite this, Black and brown people are disproportionately arrested, charged, and imprisoned for drug offenses. In some states, Black men are sent to prison on drug charges at rates “twenty to fifty times greater than those of white men” (Alexander 7). These disparities reveal that the criminal justice system is not responding to crime patterns. It’s enforcing racial hierarchy. Alexander argues that the language of crime became a race-neutral way to continue racial control after the abolishment of Jim Crow laws. Drug use is widespread across all groups, but enforcement is concentrated in communities of color. The disparities reflect systemic racism rather than actual differences in behavior.
3. When Alexander writes that “the American penal system has emerged as a system of social control unparalleled in world history.” She highlights that mass incarceration operates as a new racial caste system on an unprecedented scale. The United States imprisons more people than any other nation, with an incarceration rate “roughly eight times” that of countries like Germany (Alexander 6). She also notes that the U.S. imprisons a higher percentage of its Black population than South Africa did under apartheid (Alexander 6). Through the War on Drugs, millions of people, especially Black Americans. Have been labeled criminals and permanently excluded from full participation in society. Alexander describes this as creating an “undercaste,” a group locked into second-class status through legalized discrimination in employment, housing, voting, and public benefits (Alexander 7). The widespread scale, racial targeting, and consequences of this system make it unlike any other form of social control.

Michelle Alexander, “The New Jim Crow” (The New Press), p. 5-12.

1. The author argues that the primary explanation for mass incarceration in the U.S. and the one most widely accepted by society is profoundly flawed. Society claims that mass incarceration increased in response to the drug crisis in poor and African American neighborhoods. However, M. Alexander demonstrates that this is false using various historical counterexamples:
   –The historical contradiction: At the time President Ronald Reagan declared the War on Drugs in 1982, crack was not yet considered a dangerous crisis in Black communities, in fact, drug use was declining nationwide. In fact, the crack crisis emerged after the war on drugs began.
   –Racial inequality in punishment: She notes that surveys show that people of all races use and sell drugs in similar percentages. In fact, some studies show that white youth are more likely to use and sell drugs than youth of color. Yet, despite this, mass incarceration disproportionately affected Black and Latino people.
   – The role of the government: As an example of what the state’s true interests are, the author notes that in 1998 the CIA itself admitted that, with U.S. backing, guerrilla forces in Nicaragua smuggled large quantities of drugs into the country, which were then converted into crack in poor and African American communities, while federal agencies did everything possible to block police investigations in order to protect their geopolitical interests.
   
2. As the author mentioned, some surveys showed that drug use and sales among people of all races had similar rates, studies actually show that white youth are more likely to use and sell drugs than youth of color. Furthermore, drug crime is present in all communities, so the disparity stems from whom the police decide to target and investigate, rather than from who actually commits the crime. That is why, in many cases, drug-related crimes committed by white people go unpunished, while for the police, the priority is African Americans and Latinos. This is demonstrated when the author notes that African American men are incarcerated on drug charges 20 to 50 times more often than white men, and that in cities affected by the War on Drugs, up to 80% of African American youth now have criminal records. 
   
   In short, racial disparities in incarceration rates “cannot be explained by rates of drug crimes” since they do not reflect who commits more drug related crimes, but rather represent a political and institutional choice regarding whom to punish and arrest. For the state, drug offenses are the perfect legal pretext for selectively enforcing the law, excluding white populations and concentrating the entire criminal justice system on Black and Latino populations.
   
3. I interpret this statement as a way of saying that the United States occupies a unique position compared to other countries in terms of having an unjust social system, given that statistics show that, compared to other countries, there is a significant increase in the number of incarcerated individuals in the United States, and that many of them are Black and Latino. Furthermore, although drug offenses are committed equally across all races, the fact that penalties are concentrated to a greater extent in Black and Hispanic communities makes it clear that the social system does not seek to eradicate drugs or crime, but rather aims to control and punish African American and Hispanic communities, thereby causing the rest of society to discriminate against and exclude them.

Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. The New Press, 2010.

Ameerah Jameer

Michelle Alexander raises a number of important and interesting points. Let’s start a discussion centered on the following questions:

1. M. Alexander claims that the main explanation of why so many people are sent to jail in the U.S. today is deeply wrong. Explain her argument by referring to the various examples she mentions to backup her point. (see p. 1-2)

2. Why is it that racial disparities in the rates of incarceration “cannot be explained by rates of drug crimes”?

3. How do you understand the phrase: “the American penal system has emerged as a system of social control unparalleled in world history.”?

Before posting, watch this video, which will show you how to post your answer to this discussion board:

NOTE: Once you’ve scheduled your post to be published on at midnight on Sunday, you can still go back and edit your post until then, if you want to rewrite and/or add to your post.

As a review, follow the following steps to submit your response:

1. Click on the “+” button in the black bar at the top of the screen
2. Type a title for the post (it should include your full name)
3. Type your response
4. On the right side, click on Categories: and check “Discussion 2.1”
5. Important: On the right side, at the top: click on the date next to Publish, and enter your post date, which is this coming Sunday, at 11:59pm.
6. Click Publish and you’re done.

What will happen next is your post will automatically be published by the OpenLab system on Sunday at midnight. The goal here is for all student posts to be published at the same deadline. After that point, you can begin reading each others’ posts, and you have to comment on at least one other student’s post.

Note: please make sure that you schedule your post to be published on Sunday, midnight, not before.