Richard Williams- Discussion Board 14

  1. Ruth Gilmore says that capitalism will stop being racial capitalism, when all the white people disappear from the story. What’s the connection between “whiteness” and racism, do you think?

According to Ruth Gilmore, she asserts that capitalism is built off of inequality and racism in the tool that is used in order to keep that system in place. Hence when she shared “Capitalism requires inequality, and racism enshrines it.” When Gilmore states “capitalism will stop being racial capitalism, when all the white people disappear from the story”, she is referring to white people being taken out of the discussion, not necessarily anyone specific. She’s emphasizing how much the system is designed to uphold abstraction of whiteness. The system of racial capitalism is designed to work against certain groups of people, particularly those who are not white. In reality, whiteness serves as a safeguard to preserve the socioeconomic status of white people. Although a white person may not be racist, they still benefit from it.

2.Gilmore makes the point that criminals are actually being created by the criminal justice and prison system (she says “the category of ‘criminal person’ can be perpetuated”). According to Gilmore, how does that happen, how does the prison system create new “criminals“? Do you agree with her view?

Ruth Gilmore argues that the prison system creates new “criminals. For instance, this happens when communities that are impoverished, usually communities with a larger population of people of color are over observed. Said people are more prone to face harsh penalties, even for minor instances. Perpetuating the stereotype that people of color are a danger or a threat to society. Down the line, this leads to a cycle where being identified or perceived as a criminal will make it difficult to obtain employment or housing. Which can transpire into other challenges, for those previously incarcerated. Increasing the chance of recidivism. I do agree with Ruth Gilmore’s view because statistics and real life both show that people from specific communities are incarcerated at higher rates and face harsher penalties because they’re more likely to be targeted. I’m sure people from upscale neighborhoods are doing the same thing or even worse, but they’re just not getting caught or they’re getting a slap on the wrist.

3. Describe how you understand what Prof. Gilmore – in the last part of her video – calls “liberation struggle”?

When Ruth Gilmore discusses the “liberation struggle”I understand her to be referring to advocating for freedom and fairness. Especially for people who have been victims of systemic injustice. Gilmore emphasizes that we need to focus on helping one another and constructing a better world, not just focusing on the scrutiny. Devoting efforts to your community like advocacy for prison reform, housing access-stability-and equity, and employment opportunities.

Richard Williams- Discussion Board 13

  1. According to MLK, how can we tell the difference between just and unjust laws? Understanding this questions is the most important part of this module, and I will ask it again during our second exam.

    Martin Luther King defines just laws as “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God…Any law that uplifts human personality is just.” He suggest “An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law… An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law… Any law that degrades human personality is unjust”.

    2. In your view, is this an important distinction (between just and unjust laws), do you think it makes a difference in the way someone (as an individual, or our society as a whole) lives their lives? Can it affect our politics?

      Yes, I do believe this is an important distinction between just and unjust laws. It dictates how someone lives their lives because individuals can choose to obey just laws and disobey unjust laws. Martin Luther King makes us think question the validity of many laws and forces us to think deeper into whether or not they bring about justice and morality. This can also affect things like out politics because someone may be more inclined to vote for the candidate that is in support of laws and policies they feeling strongly about. As well as, upholding the faith and trust in Americas justice system.

      3. Based on our discussion of Question 1, give an example each, of an unjust and just law, in the US today. Explain what makes it unjust or just (using MLK’s definition of those two types of laws).

      An example of an unjust law today would be criminalizing those who suffer from of mental illness and lack of mental health support. When individuals are arrested for something their mental illness played apart of they don’t receive or are denied the proper mental health support, jails then become “treatment” centers for them. This is unjust because someone with mental illness should be treated for their mental illness at a rehab or treatment facility relevant to their condition, rather be incarcerated. This shows cases how terrible the healthcare system is in the United States and how much fine tuning is needed in our justice system. This law degrades human personality.

      An example of a just law would be The First step act (2018). This law is just because reduces the mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenders, it allows incarcerated individuals to become eligible for parole or early release under certain conditions, and works to reform previously issues sentences in connection with the Fair sentencing act (2010). This law works to give nonviolent offenders a second chance to turn over a new leaf and makes efforts to correct racial and social injustices. This law uplifts human personality.