Discussion 13

  1. According to MLK “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.”

2. Yes, in my opinion, this is an important distinction because it shapes our society as a whole and influences how we can act accordingly.

3. One example of just law Voting Rights Act of 1965 (and its enforcement today). It protects one important democratic rights equally for all citizens. One example of Unjust law Cash bail system. It’s unjust because Harms vulnerable people while overlooking the root causes of poverty.

Discussion12.1

The Supreme Court dismissed the Wal Mart class action case because the plaintiffs did not prove commonality, as alleged discrimination varied by store managers rather than resulting from a single company wide policy.

Discussion 11.1

The court system is better at protecting individuals because it works more fairly than other branches of government. Judges are appointed to the court system for a reason to serve and carry out justice fairly without being influenced by outside opinions.

I see why it might seem anti-democratic, but I don’t believe it is. I think it’s fair for the president to appoint judges themselves, selecting those they believe would be fair and work best for the court system. If a democracy allows citizens to vote for judges, people might choose the easiest or  coolest judge rather than the most qualified.

For example, imagine a general manager needs an assistant manager and wants to promote one employee who is qualified for the role, however two of the staff members meet the requirements. If the other staff members had to vote to choose their new assistant manager, the majority might vote for the one they think is cool and would let them slide on rules, like allowing phone use while on the clock while only a few might vote for the stricter, more responsible person. In this case, the coolest one would win, and work might not be done fairly. So so,I will say it’s not anti democratic if the government carefully appoints someone who would work fairly and uphold the principles of the United States’ system.

Dicussion 9.2

In the essay, P. Williams states that the war on terror is new because it is a war against people within the United States, rather than a war between two or more countries like the USA and Russia. Her point in the essay is that you may never know who a terrorist or a suspect in a crowd is because they dress like ordinary people.

The “Roving Wiretaps” of the Patriot Act seem to violate the Bill of Rights by allowing authorities to enter a suspect’s property or go through personal belongings without a warrant. This violates the Fourth Amendment.

The “sneak and peek” warrants allow law enforcement to observe a suspect’s property without letting them know they are being watched. If anything, suspicious is discovered during the observation, then further action can be taken.

Discussion 9.1

The reading in section 4.2 on securing basic freedoms explains how the Establishment Clause and the Lemon Test were created and how they work. The Establishment Clause was created to protect religious freedom by prohibiting Congress from participating in or supporting any religion. The Lemon Test was later developed by the Supreme Court to decide whether a law or government action that might promote a particular religious practice should be allowed to stand.

 

Based on the readings, yes, burning the U.S. flag is protected by the First Amendment because it counts as freedom of speech. For example, as stated in the text about Johnson v. Texas, Johnson was arrested and charged with desecration of a venerated object after burning the flag. Five years later, the Supreme Court decided that Johnson’s action burning the flag was protected by the First Amendment.

When someone says, “I’m taking the Fifth,” they mean they have the right to remain silent and not testify, as protected by the Fifth Amendment.

Discussion 7.1

As shown in the reading The Division of Powers, the difference in the role of citizens among the federal, confederal, and unitary systems is that, in a federal system, citizens engage with both national and state governments, in a confederal system, citizens interact primarily with their state government, and in a unitary system citizens interact mainly with the national government.

I was able to read and understand the division of powers and how it is formed and functions. I learned that power is shared between the federal and state governments, with each level having different responsibilities and areas of authority. The federal also know as the national government handles issues that affect the entire country, such as defense and foreign policy, while state governments manage local matters like educational systems and law enforcement.

Based on my research Federal government shaped the actions of New York State and its local governments by using financial funding, regulatory condition and public health directives, such as guidance from the CDC and funding provided through the CARES Act of 2020 to ensure that state and local actions aligned with national objectives.

U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2021). *CARES Act programs and assistance.* U.S. Department of the Treasury. [https://home.treasury.gov/](https://home.treasury.gov/)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). COVID‑19 guidance for state and local public health officials. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/)

Discussion 4.2

1. According Michale Parenti reading on capital and labor, distinction that makes between owners and employees, “they’re very rich families and individual who compose the owning class live mostly of investments, which includes stocks bonds, rents, mineral royalties, and other property incomes. Their employees live mostly of wages, salaries, and fees”. In other words, the owning class are mostly of wealthy people who gain their wealth from investments such as stocks and rental properties, for example, buying multiple real estate properties and earning income by renting them out. On the other hand, their employees are people who work for them earn money through wages per hour and salaries.

2. Adam Smith, one of the founding theorists of capitalism, noted in 1776 that “labor … is alone the ultimate and real standard by which the value of all commodities can at all times and places be estimated and compared. It is their real price; money is their nominal price only.” Adam Smith pointed out that labor is the primary and real reason why wealth exists, because workers, the working clas, is an essential part of the economy and is the main reason most owners are successful.

3. 3. My thoughts after reading the main argument of Reading 4.4 that class is NOT an identity, I agree with the idea that class is not an identity. Class should not define you based on your race or sexuality. I believe that everyone, regardless of race or sexuality, deserves equal opportunities. If class is considered an identity, then it should only reflect a person’s connection to the economy and their hard work, not their personal background or culture.

4. 4. I understand that “class structures are built around a close form of dependency” because each class depends on the other to work. For example, the owning class depends on the working class to labor for them so that they could maintain and gain wealth, while the working class depends on their jobs provided by the owning class since that is their main way to earn a living.

Discussion 4.1 (resubmitting because It was posted in comments)

4.1
1) The data on social working classes shown on the charts may or may not be correct, but it helps me to understand how social classes are measured. One of the similarities I noticed between the 4.1 and 4.2 is that both use house income data to measure and rank social classes from the lowest to the highest. A difference I noticed is that 4.2 measures and rank social classes by locations, such as the subway, where the F represents a part in Jamaica and the median income for this location is $49, and is ranked as a middle class.

2) The closet station to me is Laurelton station LIRR. I am unable to compare the data on social classes in this location, because the projectsuwibway website is currently down. I will be back to update it once the site is back up. However, based on my research, the median income for this location is $110,120, which is significantly higher than the median for New York and Queens County. This location is ranked as the upper-middle class.

3) Based on the reading in 4.2 , I notice a different pattern where the center is higher, which means its median is higher than other locations. Therefore, that location is ranked the highest wealth of all.

Discussion 6.2

After reading Federalist Paper No. 10 the concept of factions reminds me of the social class divisions that exist among different races and economic groups, such as the owning class and the working class. The owning class gains wealth and benefits through the labor and efforts of the working class, showing the inequalities that exist within society to this dayt

According to Federalist No. 10 ((written by James Madison), the source of wealth and private property is “the diversity in the faculties of men, from which the rights of property originate.” This means that the main source of wealth comes from individuals who’s born with skills, talents, and critical thinking abilities that enable them to become wealthy. Wealth does not only come from those who are born into money or privilege, it primarily comes from people who use their natural talents and abilities to create and grow wealth. The key factor explaining why some people become wealthy while others remain poor is the difference of talents. Some individuals are born with abilities that enable them to learn and grow wealth, while others are not. As a result, those without such talents often remain in the working class, while those with natural abilities use their talents to work their way up to becoming wealthy.

I somewhat agree with the explanation of wealth and poverty, because wealth is not gained only by those who are born with talent. I believe that people who are poor or may lack natural talent can also learn and develop skills that could lead them to wealth. Just because someone is illiterate does not mean they have to remain that way for their entire life, as long as they are willing to learn and work to improve their situation.

Discussion Board 6.1

Based on the arguments in Readings 6.1 and 6.2, the wealthy class such as the owning classes, investors, property owners wrote the Constitution since they held the most power, while the working class had no part in the process and was excluded from participating because they’re just the people who works for the owning class. The wealthy class consisted of the owning classes those who were born into or came from wealth while the working class comprised the laborers who worked for the owning class.

After reading the arguments in Readings 6.1 and 6.2, I would say that the social class structure of early United States society is still the same as ours today because political and economic power has almost always been in the hands of the wealthy. Just like in the past, a small group of wealthy individuals continues to hold most political influence and economic control. The working class remains largely the same, with no power or opportunity to participate in major political and economic decision making.

The people who wrote the Constitution, such as the wealthy owning class, were afraid of democracy because they feared losing control to the majority,the working classes who labored for them and helped grow their wealth. They were also afraid that members of the working class were capable and ambitious enough to rise to power, which could threaten them