These articles written by Pat Mainardi and Anne Koedt made me open my eyes more to how women are depicted throughout society and how much they are still oppressed till this day, this would also include me in this conversation. The fact that women’s voices are heard so low for so long goes to show that gender roles will always play a part throughout the world. The idea that women are still seen as vessels to give life and also take care of life without being seen or noticed for much else throughout their own life saddens me and honestly makes me angry. These articles also made me realize that women throughout history have continuously listened to societal norms and gender roles that were put in place by men in power not other women; men that can’t relate to even the idea of being a woman or the struggles that women go through on a daily basis. Another idea that stood out to me throughout these articles is the idea that women’s everyday struggles and issues are not seen as political but seen as just personal. If you think about it, society is basically saying that women’s issues are so minor they would never be discussed or brought up in a political manner. Women have not and continuously not taken seriously nor does society value women and their every day obstacles as much as society values men and their every day struggles. It’s almost as if society brushes women off to the side even knowing they are extremely important to the world as a whole.
Author Archives: Sydney Maldonado
Sydney Maldonado – Discussion #9
After reading “The Politics of Housework” by Pat Mainardi, I understand the liberated woman to be free, to be herself, and to do things she likes to do unapologetically. The liberated woman is a feminist who doesn’t want to fit in the box of societies norms on women; the liberated woman is a rebel. The liberated woman does as she pleases without the concern or worry for others opinions, she dresses how she wants to without worry about how society will judge her, she stands on her own beliefs even if they may go against what other people believe, the liberated woman is one who doesn’t agree with conforming herself to make others feel better about themselves. The liberated woman is important for women’s liberation because they give a different outlook on women, they give different meaning to being what a woman is, and they give a different point of view from another woman’s perspective. The phrase “the personal is political” also termed as “the private is political” is a political argument used as a rallying slogan of student movement and second wave feminism from the late 1960s. These two pieces of work show that “the personal is political” because they represent how because women are portrayed throughout society as the housewife’s, mothers, and the overall caretakers however their struggles, issues, and concerns are not important enough to be seen as political issues that need a platform in which changes can be evoked and women can not only feel seen but most importantly feel heard. For as long as I can remember growing up, my mom had always raised me and my sisters to be able to know how to cook, clean, take care of ourselves, take care of children, and know how to attract the “right” man specifically by learning all these qualities. Therefore, in my short twenty two years of life women have always been raised to conform to societies gender roles and norms on how to be a woman even if many of these imaginary rules and regulations were more then likely not created from other woman but instead men. I can only imagine what it was like back then. “The personal is political” is portrayed throughout these two articles by representing the fact that just because women have more needs whether that may be needing more intimacy in their relationship, needing more help with the kids at home, or needing more time for themselves in general are all seen as private issues however, “the personal is political” emphasizes that these personal issues such as sex, childcare, and the struggles of being a mom are all political issues that not only need political attention but need to be taken seriously as well.
Sydney Maldonado – Reading Reflection #7
The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory is one of the biggest moments in history because it promoted much needed and necessary change for not just women but all genders. Both videos focusing on the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire that happened on March 25th, 1911 described in detail about the horrific events that occurred, why they happened, and what change happened because of this horrible tragedy afterwards. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory was a man made disaster that could have been prevented with the right precautions, rules, and regulations. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory was a sweatshop in Manhattan, New York that was a densely packed place, where young immigrant women worked over eleven hours a day every day with extremely low wages and unsafe working conditions for all. Over five hundred young women worked there where they sat at a long table and sewed blouses for women. This horrific fire started in a bin of cotton scraps that may have been started from a cigarette bud; when the fire began to spread quickly women tried to rush out the building through the emergency exit however, the space wasn’t big enough and it collapsed. After the emergency exit/fire escape collapsed the young women tried to get out the building using the elevator however, the elevator then broke before everyone could get out safely therefore, many women jumped to their deaths from the Asch building instead of the scorching and unbearable flames. It was also stated that these young women fell to their deaths in order for their families to be able to ID them and bury them properly. The fire lasted a total of eighteen minutes and one hundred and forty six women died making it the deadliest workplace disaster in New York City history. Days later after the horrific fire, a massive funeral protest march took place where more than three hundred and fifty thousand people were in attendance for the one hundred and forty six souls that passed over a tragedy that could have been prevented. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire helped redefine the American industrial workplace because it was a key movement in the growth of labor unions particularly the international ladies garment workers union. This fire prompted more rules and regulations to be a necessity in place for workers including the Sullivan home fire prevention law which required sprinkler systems to be installed in all factories; this served as a model for state and national workplace safety codes. As I was re-learning everything I was taught about the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire throughout these two videos I realized that I did not know the extent to which change happened and the fact that citizens prompted this change just by protests and marches. Just by people coming together and fighting for these women that tragically died from this fire they were able to create more stricter laws, rules, and regulations to protect workers and above all ensure their safety as they work each and every day. Although such a tragic fire occurred for this change to happen I feel as though it woke people up and lit a fire under them that they couldn’t just ignore. To me, the most important information you can take away from these videos is that you don’t need people of high status or power to enforce much needed and necessary change for citizens in general, all you need is a bunch of people like you, who wants the same end goal for all not just specific people that it would benefit from. Many social movements begin with a bunch of regular people who aren’t rich or known but share the same drive, goal, and message that they want to promote and in the end cause change for the world in ways it may not know it needs it.
Sydney Maldonado – Discussion Board #8
Suffrage, labor rights, Suffrage, labor rights, and the equal rights amendment are related to one another because they focus on one end goal above all their goals which is equality. Each three of these topics have turned into issues throughout history and even our current society today that all relate to one another because they want to create an environment that consists of fairness and the right to have rights no matter what age, race, ethnicity, or gender one may be. These topics are also all related to one another because they are about fighting for what is not only right but ethical and necessary for the world. Labor rights are also issues of gender justice because when we stand up, protest, and speak for others especially when it comes to fighting for fair and equal labor rights then we need to make sure to include and fight for all genders and not just a specific gender like women who may have more issues than another gender when it comes to the workplace like men. When we re-evaluate labor rights or workers rights they specifically focus on giving workers of all genders equal rights like the right to fair pay, the right to work overtime and get paid time and a half, the right to take unpaid leave, and more therefore, labor rights are also issues of gender justice because although labor rights are fighting for equal rights when it comes to working it still focuses on making sure all genders are included in the fight for change and to make sure that all these changes are included for everybody to receive. I see these historical issues enacted in today’s society because in certain career fields like broadcasting journalism, computer programming, or even being a pilot men still continue to get paid more than women despite their previous experiences, educational statuses, and accolades or achievements they may have received. This goes to show that women are still fighting for equal labor rights in our current society today and that the world is still biased when it comes to seeing men and women as equal beings who can achieve the same things despite their gender. Another way I see these historical issues enacted in todays society is the continued pressure of women working while maintaining the housewife and mother role; most people still see this as a challenge for women and feel as though they are better off repeating history as its always been with the mother being a stay at home mom and wife who caters only to the home, children, and husband without there being room for women to grow and flourish into their true selves instead of letting others limit them or conform them into a box they don’t belong in.
Sydney Maldonado – Discussion Board #7
The article written by Constance Grady focuses on the waves of feminism and why people keep debating over them. This article dived deeper into the three waves of feminism and what in each wave was so influential during those points in time. I feel as though the first wave of feminism doesn’t get talked about as much anymore since we’re currently living in the third wave. The first wave of feminism, in my opinion, was the toughest. People were questioning if women were really human beings, if women deserved to have a place in society where they automatically obtained some form of power, but of course not too much power. The first wave of feminism beginning around the time 1848 and ending around the time 1920 was looked upon as “the West’s first sustained political movement dedicated to achieving political equality for women”. For 70 years these women marched, lectured, protested, faced arrests, judgment, and violence; it’s an understatement to say these women were strong. They fought through the obstacles to obtain the right to vote, for not just themselves but for women like myself who have the ability to vote today. The start of the first wave began with the Seneca Falls convention of 1848 where Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, active abolitionists, organized a meeting where over 200 women attended at a church to discuss “the social, civil, and religious conditions and rights of women” and agreed upon a list of 12 resolutions that consisted of specific equal rights including a woman’s right to vote. If we think about it, this was the very first meeting that sparked a revolutionary and reform type of social movement created by women to fight for women in not only their time but for the women to come in the future. One of the most important parts of this meeting was the women of color that attended such as Sojourner Truth, Maria Stewart, and Frances E.W. Harper who were not only key forces throughout the movement; these women not only spoke up for equal rights for women but they made to advocate and protest for specifically women of colors universal suffrage and inequalities. It’s important to note that when this movement first began, racism impacted the way white women viewed the women of color who spoke for and represented the women’s movement. In Grady’s article it states, “If educated women are not as fit to decide who shall be the rulers of this country, as ‘field hands,’ then where’s the use of culture, or any brain at all?” demanded one white woman who wrote in to Stanton and Anthony’s newspaper, the Revolution. “One might as well have been ‘born on the plantation.’” Black women were barred from some demonstrations or forced to walk behind white women in others.” This statement alone is powerful because it points out the first planted problem throughout this feminist movement, the idea that the feminism is focused on fighting for and protecting the rights of white women instead of all women. Even though women were granted the right to vote in 1920 by Congress who passed the 19th amendment, it was still a challenge for black women to vote, especially in the South. In my opinion, women made incredible progress throughout the first wave of feminism and start of the women’s movement however, throughout all the suffering and constant fighting for women somehow black women were still in some way excluded from it which did women of color a grave injustice and essentially set back the movement in a major way.
Reading Reflection #6 – Sydney Maldonado
In the article, “What’s in a Name?’ On Writing the History of Feminism” by Claire Goldberg Moses focuses on the history of the term “feminism” throughout the 19th century and dives deeper into how the term “feminism” and its movement has changed and matured over time into the 21st century. Claire takes us through a timeline that further informs us on how the powerful actions of women throughout history flourished into the term “feminism”, actions like, fighting for equal rights, fighting for the right to vote, fighting for equality in work environments, and fighting the overall stereotypes and preset gender roles that put women into what I can best describe as a box. Throughout the article, Clare mentions how since the 1990s her undergraduate students for the most part, declined to call themselves feminists although they agreed with all that feminism stands, for example, when Claire asked her students if they believed that women and men should be treated equally in the law, they all strongly agreed. However, Claire’s students did not like being called feminists because they disliked and rejected the stereotypical ideology there is and has been for people labeled feminists. Throughout movies or TV shows, the distorted version of feminism has become increasingly common to not only exist but be reenacted in various forms. These versions of feminists were looked upon as evil, bitter, and just simply strong and proud women. Therefore, the students were a hundred percent feminists in every way however they did not want to be labeled or seen as the distorted version of feminism as they felt as though it did not relate or pertain to them. An important question Claire raises to us in the article states, “does it matter how we name ourselves? After all, the struggle for women’s equality could continue by a multitude of other names. I’d like to suggest it does matter. It matters because our history matters. It matters because those who distort our history are not motivated by a concern for women’s equality.” This question and reasoning Claire states is essential to not only acknowledge but truly understand the why behind it. The word feminism and the history behind it was not an easy road to travel and still isn’t, therefore, it’s imperative to rid of the distorted version of feminism and stereotyped ideology of a feminist. It is also imperative to educate those who believe these distorted versions of those who know nothing about feminism or what it is to be a feminist.
Sydney Maldonado – Reading Reflection #4
The readings “Patriarchy, the System: An It, Not a He, a Them, or an Us” by Allan Johnson and “There Is No Hierarchy of Oppressions” by Audre Lorde were not only touching as she goes into depth about her different identities it is also exceptional and informative on the concepts of privilege and oppression but they help us think more about what it is like for those who are oppressed and live under their oppressors.
Johnson’s article goes into depth about patriarchy as he breaks down what is included in patriarchy and how the system impacts our society as a whole. I feel as though Johnson focuses specifically on the notion of patriarchy while also describing ideologies like social systems that make patriarchy what it is today. Johnson also dissects how patriarchy is a system and not just based on one group of individuals or one person in particular. Patriarchy is a kind of society organized around certain kinds of social relationships and ideas. As individuals, we participate in it. Paradoxically, our participation both shapes our lives and gives us the opportunity to be part of changing or perpetuating it. Throughout the reading, Johnson helped me understand the concept of the patriarchal system by going into depth about socialization and how it influences the system of patriarchy and how it continues to work the way that it does. What I took away from this article is that patriarchy isn’t about one specific person or one specific group like males or females but it is a system that continues to operate because we continue to allow it to happen since we are in the system even though we didn’t create it we are a part of it. Even if every person in the world agreed that patriarchy is present today and has always been present in history does not mean that the system will change in a more inclusive and positive direction. It will take a great deal of time for people to analyze what concepts are involved in our patriarchy system and how we can make steps to change it moving forward. To understand what patriarchy is, people need to dig deeper into the world’s social system and the social problems society faces time and time again because nothing is being done to break these patterns of repetition and fix social problems for once and for all in our social system. To dive even deeper Johnson states, “we cannot understand the world and our lives in it without looking at the dynamic relationship between individual people and social systems. Nor can we understand the countless details.” I feel as though Johnson wants us to grasp the idea that social systems and the repetitive issues those systems face are a part of patriarchy; are in a way what makes up the patriarchal system. Johnson needs us to not only acknowledge that idea but to figure out steps to change it and move forward instead of just acknowledging it and moving on. In the reading, Johnson also describes the concept of resistance and how patriarchal culture makes us less resistant to situations. For example, you’re walking down a dark sidewalk and you’re passing by an alley but when you pass by the alley you see a young woman is getting mugged by an older man. Instead of sticking up for the young girl you do the opposite and continue on your walk down the street. You’re probably thinking why wouldn’t I help the young girl? Well, it’s because resistance has become a part of patriarchy and the patriarchal society. The path of least resistance in this situation is to continue on your walk, mind your business, and not cause any more trouble. To not get in the way of a man doing what he wants to a woman, to not being accused of helping and siding with a woman against a man which if you were a man in this instance, make you feel like less of a man unless you are willing to deal with the even greater resistance that would follow. In this instance, you will continue to take the least resistant path because you are so used to going along with things in a patriarchal system instead of fighting against it or in this example fighting for the young girl.
Audre Lorde’s article “There Is No Hierarchy of Oppressions” focuses on intersectionality and what is is like from a standpoint of a black woman who also identifies as a lesbian, feminist, socialist, poet, mother of two, and a member of an interracial couple. I appreciated Lorde’s article because I not only learned about intersectionality on a more personal and detailed level but I learned that it is harder to associate yourself with one specific group when one is so much more intricate than that. The complex connection between the various dimensions of identity is described as the term intersectionality. These various dimensions of identity can be things such as; sexual orientation, gender identity, and racial identity. Lorde always speaks her own identities being a black woman, lesbian, feminist, socialist, and more. Due to Lorde having more than one identity she refuses to only identify with one even if it may benefit her at that point in time; Lorde states, “I know that my people cannot possibly profit from the oppression of any other group which seeks the right to peaceful existence. Rather, we diminish ourselves by denying to others what we have shed blood to obtain for our children. And those children need to learn that they do not have to become like each other in order to work together for a future they will all share.” I think this is a powerful statement because it represents Lorde’s ideology that no one should conform to one identity they associate with even if it benefits them in any way because those benefits won’t last forever. Rather than diminishing your identity by denying it to others to be accepted for the time being, one should appreciate the different parts of their identity and never conform to what society deems acceptable.
Sydney Maldonado – Discussion #5
It is important to recognize patriarchy as a system and not an individual identity because if we understand patriarchy to only be associated with identity then we will never truly understand what patriarchy is and patriarchal culture. Patriarchy is a system that encompasses the world as a whole; we can see patriarchy as a blueprint for society; a guideline to know what is accepted and appropriate and what is not. Patriarchy is best described as multilayered and multifaceted. Although individuals or groups of people can enact patriarchy we must still remember that patriarchy within the world is a system that has been present throughout past societies. If we just conform patriarchy to be ‘blamed’ on a specific group of people or one person then we will never truly not only acknowledge the real idea of patriarchy but we can’t work towards real change to end the outdated patriarchy system.
Although we know patriarchy is a system, individuals enact patriarchy in their personal thoughts, interpersonal actions, as members of institutions, and in the structure of our culture. Patriarchy might work at levels such as personal, interpersonal, institutional, and cultural/structural and those levels influence one another. Patriarchy can work on a personal level based on beliefs about others and attitudes about differences between others. For example, the traditional belief that men are the head of the households throughout every hospital is a form of patriarchy. If one believes that men are the breadwinners, the handymans, and the protectors in every household, or specifically every family then that is a patriarchal way of thinking. When men believe that women are only meant to be housewives or stay at home moms instead of strong, independent, and hard-working leaders more specifically equal to men then that is a patriarchal way of thinking about women. Patriarchy can work on an interpersonal level; this is because patriarchy can impact actions and behaviors. For example, violence between a man and a woman, patriarchy can impact interpersonal relationships because it influences a variety of factors from the motives of violence, to cultural, to social; more specifically, gender inequality. Patriarchy can work on an institutional level. For example, in some areas in the world like Ohio, Kentucky, and Mississspi it is illegal to get an abortion after six weeks; most women don’t realize, notice, or find out they are pregnant by or before that time. Patriarchy exists on an institutional level in areas like this because those specific social systems in those areas throughout the world are oppressing women and their rights to have an abortion. People in power throughout those areas are speaking for women and making rules and regulations for women to abide by but most of these people passing these types of laws are men. Men that can never understand, grasp, or know the concept of pregnancy and what it is like to get pregnant, be pregnant, give birth, and raise children. Essentially, these are organizations within social systems that oppress people both intentionally and unintentionally. Patriarchy can definitely influence and be influenced by culture because it is shown every day through different social media platforms. On social media, both men and women need to look their best and be at the best points in their lives at all times.
Sydney Maldonado – Discussion Board #4
After completing the readings and watching the video “What is Privilege” I sat back and thought about certain ways in which I experience privilege. The fact that I live in the United States alone is a privilege because I have more freedom compared to other countries; I have more opportunities to accomplish my goals and make a better life than I had. Living in the U.S. you have the ability to study in any type of field you want while pursuing other careers and following other dreams. Another privilege I have is the fact that I can see a doctor whenever I feel the need to; advanced medicine and technology is accessible to me therefore, I never really have to worry if I am sick because I know there are people, places, and medicines that can help me get better. A third way I experience privilege throughout my life is my very light skin color; although I am Puerto Rican and Colombian my mom’s skin complexion is white and I took on her complexion therefore, a lot of the times people mistake me as a white woman and I feel as though I get treated in a way better than others who do not have my skin color. I don’t get judged or stereotyped as often as other hispanic people with darker skin complexions or people with darker skin complexions in general. Lastly, another way I have experienced privilege in my life is the fact that I grew up with both my parents; even though they were split since before I was born, I’ve always had both my parents in my life along with my siblings. I grew up with a family that is supportive in ways which they believe in me, they care about my dreams, and they help me reach my goals and accomplishments in a supportive way. On the other hand, there are some ways I’ve experienced oppression throughout my life. Living with my mom my whole life, as she was the primary parent, she worked two jobs; this included weekends, holidays, and lots of days of overtime. Therefore, my mom was unable to spend a lot of time with us due to the fact that she had to work so hard to provide for us. Another way I’ve experienced oppression is due to the fact that I was diagnosed with anxiety; people have judged me and treated me differently just based on the reality that I have anxiety. People treat me as though I’m extremely fragile and in ways broken. I was also bullied through some years of high school based on the ways I would try to deal with my anxiety like severe finger nail biting. I would bite my nails till they bled; they always looked ugly and people were sure to make me aware of that. Lastly, another way I experience oppression is simply the fact that I am a woman; I’m unable to freely express myself through my clothing because I have to be worried about the unwanted attention it would bring me every day. I’m also constantly worried about any form of harassment I can encounter just going to work or going to school. I feel as though men specifically see me as an easy target because not only am I a woman but I’m also very petite so I’m not viewed as dangerous or a threat but more as a friend or a friendly individual. From watching the video and evaluating the readings; they have helped me view the concepts of oppression and privilege from a wider point of view and understand them on a deeper level. Before the readings I mostly viewed privilege as something specifically people of white race had over every other race; however, privilege is a concept that can relate to everyone in some sort of way based on what is a part of their identity. Intersectionality plays a big part in that idea because the theory sums up the exploration on how individuals can face multiple categories of disccrimination and overall oppression when they belong to more than one marginalized group. Before the readings I didn’t have a clear idea of oppression but after I reflected on the readings, I view oppression as the element in which something or someone is caught between or among forces and barriers which are so related to each other that together they restrain, restrict, and prevent something or someone’s motion or mobility. Oppression is made to mold, immobilize, and reduce someone down to something that society as a whole can deem acceptable.
Sydney Maldonado – Reading Reflection #3
Marilyn Frye, Peggy McIntosh, and Joseph Mabry all individually speak on the overall ideology of oppression but also go into depth about oppression and how it relates to privilege. Before reading these articles I had strong definitions of oppression and privilege and in ways I am right however, I’ve learned there is much more than what’s just on the surface when it comes to oppression and privilege. In the article, “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” by Peggy McIntosh obviously focuses on white privilege but McIntosh also zooms in on identifying some of the daily effects of white privilege in her life as a white person. Peggy acknowledges that since we have hierarchies in place throughout our society then there was most likely an occurrence of white privilege that has frequently been denied and protected. An important topic Peggy points out is her own personal examples of her white privilege throughout her everyday life; she also points out how her skin color was an asset throughout her life instead of it hindering her. McIntosh states, “My skin color was an asset for any move I was educated to want to make. I could think of myself as belonging in major ways, and of making social systems work for me. I could freely disparage, fear, neglect, or be oblivious to anything outside of the dominant cultural forms. Being of the main culture, I could also criticize it fairly and freely.” This statement truly spoke to me in a deep way because McIntosh was evaluating all the pros that come with having white skin; she does not have to worry about her skin color working against her because white skin has been favored for centuries. In addition to her acknowledging and understanding that her white skin rules in her favor. She also points out and understands that even though her specific racial group was taught to be confident, comfortable, and oblivious to the oppression in society in return, it made other racial groups unconfident, uncomfortable, and essentially alienated throughout society. I think it’s extremely important for people of white descent to speak on the idea that white privilege not only exists but it has and still is causing continuous damage and trauma to people of other races. When society can truly come to one accord and agree with this idea then I believe we can start the conversation of making steps to change society and the systematic way of thinking about race. In the article, “Oppression” by Marilyn Frye, informs us of oppression and the oppression of women throughout society. An important analogy Frye uses to describe the oppression of women to the situation of a bird in a cage. The analogy focuses on the aim that a woman can constantly become caught in a bind where despite her best efforts she will constantly have obstacles put in her path that will be difficult to overcome. These obstacles are difficult to recognize due to the constant fronts that are put up in society to hide these ideas. Even though both men and women are oppressed in their own ways, women somehow become more oppressed due to the simple fact that the system as a whole benefits men, as it always has. In the article, “When Privilege and Oppression Intersect” written by Joseph Mabry touches base on his own experiences of both privilege and oppression being a blind white man. This article taught me that not only can privilege and oppression cross paths but Mabry also taught me that intersectionality is a theory that also plays a part in oppression. Mabry states, “Intersectionality is a theory that explores how individuals can face multiple categories of discrimination when they belong to more than one marganlized group. Everyone possesses multiple identities, and these identities work together to shape each person’s societal and cultural experience.” This idea goes into detail about how intersectionality is involved in oppression simply because not one person just has one identity, they have many, and they belong in more than one group. Therefore, it does not mean that people with white skin can’t experience oppression, they can just in different ways since they attach different aspects to their identity that make them who they are. And even though white people can experience oppression it does not mean that that specific type of oppression can compare to what other racial groups experience in their everyday lives. Mabry helped me think more deeply about ways in which I may have experienced oppression and although I don’t consider this specific experience actually a form of oppression it certainly made me feel out of place, uncomfortable, and in a way embarrassed. As a hispanic woman who has lived in Park Slope all my life where it is fairly populated with mostly people of white skin, people have sometimes looked at me as though I did not belong in that neighborhood or on their specific block. One day when I was walking home from school as I did everyday, I finally reached the block I lived on; as I was walking up the block to my apartment building I was being looked at and watched by a couple on the block. They whispered to each other as I walked past them asking each other if they’ve ever seen me before. It made me feel as though I did not belong there, I did not deserve to live in such a nice and fairly expensive area to live in. I was also a bit shocked that I was being judged essentially based on how I looked; my race. It didn’t make me feel good and that experience alone made me realize a small part of how others feel on a day to day basis as they are oppressed in more horrific ways then I may have been.