Author Archives: Clare Kutsko

Clare Kutsko Discussion 8

The major issues behind the movement towards the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), were primarily women’s suffrage and labor rights. These are two topics that women fought for their right in for decades. With all the inequality we are looking at in this course and through the readings touches a little bit on different injustices, because they can’t help but connect. If there is someone who wants to be at the top, they most likely are pushing the majority to the bottom, metaphorically speaking.

More specifically, when women came up against these issues, they connected within themselves. If a women wants to make changes in how the system is run, wether it be decisions about her own work, life, and body, or other decisions as a member of society, she has to have a say in who is running the government offices. Therefor, she needs the right to vote. Additionally, if a woman wants to then fight for the labor conditions where she works, or labor rights in general, she needs access to the persuasion of the law.

ERA would give all the changes some land to stand on, because before they are just a fight away of being lost or won, and that is too risky when time and time again has shown that people’s lives end up on the line, not only literally but figuratively. People dye in fires, they die from abuse, and they also live a lot better if they can take part n the culture around them, contributing to it as well as having a say about their rights in it.

The Labor laws are also a gender issue because of the different types of jobs given to people. In the films we watched. Although they have been extended into many different variations and developments, they were originally born from the devastation of the  Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire.

I see labor issues all the time, not just from women’s to men’s salaries, but the protection of women and children. Like we learned about in the final movie, sweat shops, fast fashion, coming down on the women who have to also bring their children with them.

Clare Kutsko Reflection 6

In the Vox article, The waves of feminism, and why people keep fighting over them, explained by Constance Grady she mentions the damaging stereotypes that were formed around feminists in the 1980s. “Second-wave feminists as humorless, hairy-legged shrews who cared only about petty bullshit like bras instead of real problems, probably to distract themselves from the loneliness of their lives, since no man would ever want a (shudder) feminist”.

This stood out to me because it is very sad and familiar. I grew up in the 80-90s and I remember there being a stigma around feminism. Feminists were framed as bitter, angry, and man-hating. This took on the overwhelming view of the feminist.

This seems like the epitome sexism. Women can’t have feelings beyond a small range of ones that are centered around what men want from them. Of course no one likes to be angry and bitter, but we become angry because something is not right, our basic needs are not being met.

I am in awe of the women, and activist in general, that have continued to stand up day after day- century after century without getting completely defeated and giving up. Honestly I would understand if someone were in fact a little bitter at the end of the day. That is still not a good reason to not honor equality.

Clare Kutsko Discussion 7

When looking back on the waves of feminism, although it seems a little confusing at times, I can also see why it has been in waves and hasn’t been linear. As we’ve been learning, there are so many layers to oppression and when you’re underneath them all it seems impossible to sort through to find out what is the root cause.

I can see how initially Feminism got traction through identifiable goals like legal rights the suffrage movement. Kind of like the low hanging fruit, not to say these were at all easy, just much more obvious than the nuances that came later.

In fact I was shocked to find out how hard it has been to make these changes. In the article, Virginia Just Became the 38th State to Pass the Equal Rights Amendment. Here’s What to Know About the History of the ERA by Tara Law for TIME Magazine, Law reveals that although the fight for the vote and equal rights act began a century ago, there are still loose ends. And, it wasn’t until 1965 when there was full voting rights for African Americans.

This goes to show that although movements that can change can start with just one person and grow into something that inspires for centuries to come, it has to start and it might be a long road ahead.

The second and third wave seem to touch more on the abstract than the concrete. Sexism, cultural inequalities, gender norms, and the role of women in society. Oppression runs deep and it can take a lot of time and constant change to chip away at what has held it together. I assume this is why the second wave was criticized by the third wave, and so on. It’s a long process to understand how to deal with issues that are so deeply woven into fabric of life.

Clare Kutsko Reflection 5

I really like how this week’s reading, How to Think Like an Activist, gave such a broad view of activism form the history of the French Revolution through to youth activism today. It really is amazing to see how connected things are and how every movement has made where for human rights to get better and more inclusive. It also opens up our eyes to more issues, so it can seem never ending, the amount of work that needs to be done to be fair and just, but maybe it the work of our lives.

I also like how there are so many practical tips on getting involved in activism, a lot of them are also just human relations skills. First you do have to learn how to be with others, work with others, create a safe open space. Pretty much, if you’re fighting for freedom and care of others, you better first learn how to live in a caring and receptive way. Additionally, all the tips are creating long lasting activists that can work together in a sustainable way to actually stick together to make change. Because, if the band breaks up too soon because of disagreements and bad relationships, than you’re gonna be much use to any cause.

Great reading, really enjoyed the vast amount of education offered as well as all the tools and tips.

Clare Kutsko Discussion 6

I see activism as taking part in a group or movement that is supporting the freedom of or fighting for the rights to freedom of any group of society that is oppressed, disadvantaged, underprivileged, etc. I like the word activism because it says to be active in something, helping create movement and action. I would say before reading this article I would’ve thought you could only be an activist if you were a part of a movement, doing something to help on a larger scale, organizing event or marches, etc. I have always felt like I don’t do enough, I could and should do more, do better. I noticed that this way of thinking doesn’t ever propel me into lasting change, I can see it is limited in it’s all or nothing perspective. After this reading I feel more confident about doing what I can and that being ok and enough. From sharing ideas, learning, staying open and curious, listening and receiving feedback, getting a mentor, and all the tips on how to be a better learner are extremely valuable tools for navigating finding a place in the world to be of service.

I watched United in Anger, the history of ACT UP. I chose this film because I want to learn more about the AIDS epidemic as I don’t feel very educated about what happened, I have only heard snippets of stories and history over time. Living in NYC I feel it is such a presence here, so many people I come across experienced that time in a very real way, living through it and losing many friends. I didn’t know that the ACT UP movement was fighting for drugs to be released faster from the FDA. It really shows how complex different situations can be, given what we are currently seeing with people not wanting the COVID vaccines because they see that the FDA released them too fast. Every situation is very different and with the AIDS Epidemic they were fighting for their right to be considered in the decisions about the drugs, whether they could take them or not.

ACT UP, like a lot of movements, end up intersecting other issues which can bring light to complexity that multiple people deal with. In this case, one of those examples was the women’s movement that happened alongside and at times along with the ACT UP movement. In the film they show women fighting for similar causes, rights of their own bodies and to be a part of decisions made about birth control rights. These two issues intersecting at this time in history as well as having crossover cases. Women were being told by religious figures to not use protection during intercourse which was very dangerous given the rate AIDS was spreading.

As mentioned in this film, the power of people coming together and pressuring institutions and systems that be is incredible and can be monumentally successful. I could really see this from being in NYC for the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests. Not only can you see how when people come together it can really make change on a bigger level, but being there also makes change on a personal level. Seeing and feeling the power of that movement at that time changed me forever. I think activism is impactful and I think it’s important for everyone to take part in being an activist in some way, because when you around change you learn to see people and see the truth, which then leads to real impactful change. I would like to find ways to be an activist in my life on a daily basis instead of just for the big things, I am happy to read this article and look forward to going back and reading all the suggestion pages.

Clare Kutsko Reflection 4

I really enjoyed both these readings. The Allan Johnson article was especially profound, just because it was so long with so much information. When he mentioned how we always say, “it’s the system, blame it on the system”, no one ever really asked or explains what that means. What is the systems and who created it and why. I don’t know, and hear people say that all the time, which is fine, it’s true, but it is so good to be reminded that we need to get more information.

I think my life is painted in a certain way that I don’t see the extremes of patriarchy as much as I am surely surrounded by the nuances. Meaning, I am not around a lot of people who think men should be masculine and tough, that they shouldn’t treat women well, or that women should not work and just be mothers. However, i do see people fighting to change from being this way, and sometimes over correcting, flip flopping and trying to make changes themselves. Which in this article makes very clear that is not the way. All that said, I know I still live in a very patriarchal society, even if some of the people are “dressed up” to look a different way. And that is where and why it is really useful and helpful that articles like this are out there so we at least know what to start trying to look for to learn about how to make change.

Clare Kutsko Discussion 5

In the article Patriarchy, The System by Allan Johnson, he explains that we are stuck in a mind set that our social structures begin and end with the individual. Meaning that, we are all responsible for ourselves and how we act, including as it relates to patriarchy. However, he goes on to explain that this is not what causes oppression and a society of privilege. The system is already set up to oppress, and just by being in it we are set up to keep it going.

The reason it is important to see that patriarchy as a system and not an individual identity is because real change can only come from first understanding the system and how we take part in it, then taking the path of resistance to go in a direction that will not continue to support this system.

One way patriarchy exists in cultural structures is how men are expected to become leaders and women are encouraged to try as an act of strength and independence. This already sets up an uneven playing ground. The women will have to try much harder to make it into leading positions. As a result of the attention that these changes attract they usually are made to be such a big deal. This is a good example of why the path of least resistance, having men in power, continues to be taken. There are not many people who are willing to endure the challenge of going against the grain. Staying in the manufactured roles assigned to genders creates a culture that is based around those roles.

This plays out through the individuals, beliefs about themselves and others, and the decision they make. As well as interpersonally, women will have an expectation of themselves from the patriarchal rules, these rules will seem to benefit them if they take part. They will likely have something in common with other women, they will find a partner that will reinforce that they’re doing a good job. I don’t think any of this is necessarily better than freedom, but if all that’s known is to do something new and unknown, or to do something tried and true that gives you attention and gold stars, no matter how uncomfortable it can also be, it would be insane to choose differently. So the system is almost tied into our core needs and beliefs as human beings.

Clare Kutsko Reflection 3

One reaction that I can’t help but point out is that I did find both of these readings very extreme and rigid. Going back to our first reading, Bell Hooks talks about her definition of Feminism not being about tit for that, women getting what men have. That it’s about dismantling sexism. Example: I know that there are all different kinds of men and some of them are oppressed as men within the male system. So, I felt turned off by the extreme thinking in this week’s readings. It struck me as unrealistic and un-imaginative.Why does that matter? Because coming at problems with an extreme outlook does not leave room for variation and nuance. In order to come up with the kind of solution a colossal problem like this, we need to be extremely creative. We need to look at the macro and the micro and all that lies between.

All that said, I did get a lot from these readings, they were challenging me and really getting me to think and care. I bounced back and forth in my mind while reading them. It is clear that there are people who are living at all scales of disadvantage and the systems of oppression are kept invisible. In the reading by Peggy McIntosh she states, “Whites are taught to think of their lives at morally neutral, normative, and average.” That is such a simple and clear example of how white people are kept protected within this invisible system that cages others.

Clare Kutsko Discussion 4

I know I experience a lot of privilege and I agree with some of the people in this video that you don’t really know what to do with that information once you’ve been made aware of it. I have definitely learned to start by appreciating it working to change my frame of thinking about myself and others in relation to this unearned privileges. There are some reasons I would’ve taken steps back in the exercise, from disabilities and circumstances from time and place. However, I am a heterosexual white female from a middle class family and I can also see that my unearned privileges took care of those things in life that were hindrances to my success. I.e. Health care, supportive family, a safe home to go to, people to fall back on that could support me, etc.

I relate to the general oppressive examples give in the Frye reading. However, I found them very extreme examples, black/ white thinking. it might be that my circumstances of time and place, the way my parents raised me, the political climate I grew up in, and the people I got to be surrounded by made it so the consequences that she spoke of were very rare and for the most part there has always been a way out. Or at least, the cage is a lot more broad and roomie than she makes it out to be, or that other people experience it as. By no means do I mean to say that people don’t experience it that way, in my life I would not say that has been my biggest challenge, the oppression of being a woman. I honestly think the biggest way I experience oppression is probably in such a macro scale I am not even aware of it on a day to day.

I found the part about oppressor being oppressed very interesting. If the oppressor is the one ultimately benefiting than they are not being oppressed. I think this answers a lot to my own response about how I experience oppression in my life. I know I could come up with answers to that questions, but I ultimately know that my privileges outweigh my disadvantages. I am not caught between a rock and a hard place, there has always been a solution for me, and I don’t know that those solutions would’ve been there for anyone/ everyone.

There were a few things that I will hold onto from the readings that have helped me understand oppression. I found the birdcage analogy in Oppression by Marilyn Frye very helpful for thinking about both white privilege and oppression of women. As well as the definition given that, “the experience of oppressed people is living within barriers that are not accidental and are not avoidable. Every direction is blocked or booby trapped.”

Clare Kutsko Reflection 2

I found this reading really enlightening. The writer, Alok, starts out with a strong, honest, and intimate statement about the present day experience that gender non-conforming people are having in the fight for their existence. They use a language that really makes the reader aware that these are people, with real lives, lives that can not be ignored or oppressed. The words engagement with us, our own experiences, we, really stood out to me. Taking what is often talked about as a academic subject to be debated or have an opinion on and personifying it. The way Alok writes is very impactful and this book has such a great message with a strong stance.

They call out that we are in a state of emergency, and go directly into breaking down the denial of the danger non-conforming people are in and telling the truth about the violence that is happening. From there through the rest of the reading Alok responds to all the side comments, objections, and misinformation about gender with a very clear and sound voice and a fail proof argument full of facts.

This was a great read and I will recommend it to people I know as I think it covers a lot of uncovered territory in a digestible clear way.