Author Archives: Anna Serbina

Anna Serbina Reflection 5

This weeks reading broke down activism and made it simple for me to understand. I learned that it existed throughout history in different forms, and how it changed over time. In contrast with bloody revolutions and mass protests that were common in the past, a lot of today’s activism happens online. Because of this, I realized that it is something everyone can do through resources they have. All of us have access to different fields and to different knowledge. I think it is important to use them for good, and to share the knowledge you have, because it can complete someone else’s understanding of an issue. You don’t have to necessarily stand outside on the street for hours, or write a manifesto and try to spread it somehow. All you need to share something is an internet platform.

The documentary I watched this week is called “The Vessel.” It is about activists that work together to combat restrictions of reproductive rights. Rebecca Gomperts, who is a central figure of the documentary, gave me a sense of empowerment as I watched the film. She is a Dutch physician who used her authority in healthcare to address the abortion rules imposed in many countries. It was heartbreaking to see how much resistance and negativity she had to face upon arriving in all of those countries. She and her team received threats, blockades from the governments and protests specifically aimed at them. Yet Rebecca didn’t seem discouraged and sad because of it. In fact, I felt like this resistance fueled her dedication more and more. The team eventually starts to create an underground network of activists around the world who train women how to conduct self-managed abortions. Its amazing to me. Not only the film was very enlightening, it also gave me an idea of what my activism can be about and inspired to be more vocal about it.

Anna Serbina Discussion 6

After reading “How To Think Like An Activist” by Wendy Syfret and watching a film, I can define activism as acting towards initiation of change and inspiring others to do the same. These actions don’t have to be overly obvious or loud: talking about an issue with someone you know is already activism, in my opinion. Very often talking is what later on would inspire more direct action and help gather more people that would work with you on the same cause. Syfret writes: “No one person can change the world. But every one of us can shape it.” This quote very much reflect what activism is.

The film I chose to watch was “Vessel” which concerned abortion rights. It documents a group of people who’s initial goal was to provide safe medical abortions to people from countries where it is prohibited by means of finding loopholes in international laws. They created an organization “Women on Waves” led by Dr. Rebecca Gomperts and sailed a ship, on which they boarded women from different countries and performed abortions on it, while being in the area of international waters, where laws of the prohibiting countries are not in effect anymore. It started like this, but went beyond the ship, as the group realized how big of a problem it is to get an abortion for so many people in the world. As a result, they started other projects that were no less creative than the ship. For instance, they spread a guide on doing safe self-managed abortions for women who had no other option, and created a support hotline for women who were doing it. Although the activism in the film is not directed at the cause of an issue, meaning eliminating abortion laws, it is still very powerful, as they help people affected by law directly.

I believe I have engaged in activism a couple of times when I didn’t even recognize it. In middle school and high school, I participated in performances and concerts that dealt with ecology and environmental issues. Later on, I started bringing up the topic of sustainability in my family and with friends. When there was a chance, I also tried to “educate” them on topics of gender and sexuality, and still doing so. After doing the reading, however, I realized that there are many more ways to make a contribution, especially with our access to technology. Because of social media, it is much easier nowadays to spread a message, and there are more creative ways to do so. It can be as simple as blogging on a platform such as Twitter. If used properly, they can be a powerful tool for an activist.

Anna Serbina Reflection 13

I’m glad the topic of reproductive rights was brought up this week, because I was able to catch up on everything that was going on. I didn’t know about the details of the leaked decision, neither did I know about the Hyde Amendment, which blocks federal funding for abortions. This means people who rely on Medicaid would have to search for other ways to fund their abortion, which in many cases is impossible. Watching the short movie “Abortion Helpline, This is Lisa,” which shows these cases, almost made me cry. I kept imagining myself in the place of everyone who called the Helpline, realizing that this can also happen to me and how precarious my life is. Not terminating pregnancy sometimes means not surviving after that, because you’re loosing your financial security. And sometime this means having one more person in this world with a traumatic childhood, growing up in extreme poverty and in many cases, not being able to get out of it. This traces back to what Rebecca Gomperts said in an interview: “when you keep people poor, you can control them.” It was a pleasure to read an interview with Gomperts because I watched the documentary Vessel, about her activity, for one of our assignments in this class.

I also didn’t know that abortion bans were implemented to benefit slave-holders and amplify their wealth. Considering what I just wrote about keeping people poor, one may see a really strong connection here, which feels terrifying. As if slavery has never gone away, but just changed its look.

Anna Serbina Discussion 14

My initial reaction to the leaked document was irritation and anger. I thought “Well, this county is really going back in time now.” This is one of the very few topics I’m opinionated about. As a woman, I care about my rights. But also as a human, I care about having a choice. I am an immigrant in the US for this reason. I think a lot of immigrants come for freedom of both expression and choice, because of how diverse this country is, and how abundant its market is. So the news made me quite sad and also, confused. I could not understand why would they go back to review something like that. Aren’t there enough issues that are more important?

I learned the details of the draft opinion and the reasoning of the people behind it. They claim that Roe decision conflicts with the Constitution because it “invented a right mentioned nowhere in the Constitution.” They suggest that the decision caused a negative demographic effect, since “a highly disproportionate percentage of aborted fetuses are black.” I wonder if the author of this statement is aware of why it is the case. Speaking of this, I also learned from the short movie “Abortion Helpline, This is Lisa” why exactly reproductive rights are a privilege. The issue is not really about the morals behind abortions, but more about the financial toll of it. People with money can afford to pay out of pocket or to travel to another state/country for their medical services. People who can’t – would become ever poorer. It seems like the whole abortion controversy is not about religion, morals, or principles, but about maintaining and expanding the financial gap. The poorer the nation, the easier it is to rule them how you want.

I think it is important to remember that politics in the US is a pendulum, and at some point, the decisions and laws will go back to being in favor of the opposing group. But we also need to remember that we as a society have the power to either accelerate the change or help to withstand the current conditions until the change is achieved. Rebbeca Gomperts and Women’s Medical Fund are examples.

Anna Serbina Reflection 12

The biggest message that I acquired from the reading “Why Artistic Activism” is that art and activism fuel each other: art gains more meaning and value, while activism gains more energy and dimensions. Combining these two means greater support from society, because art is easier to perceive than complicated texts and professional literature. It also deals with pathos and thus people take an issue more seriously. In modern society, it spreads quicker. And, it is a way to bypass censorship in a repressive regime, which I’m seeing a lot right now. For instance, the green ribbon project in Russia is a form of anti-war protest, where people just hang green pieces of fabric or ribbon everywhere they can on the streets. Such activism is hidden and communicates in the first place to like-minded people, showing them that they’re not alone in this. Interestingly, almost all art that I’ve observed lately is a form of activism, yet I didn’t know there’s a term dedicated to it.

In the second article “10 Female Performance Artists You Should Know, from Ana Mendieta to Carolee Schneemann,” one thing that drew my attention was dance as a form of artistic activism. Because I grew up dancing, I’m especially sensitive to performances and I can translate them easily into a story or a message. Through the example of dance, I could realize why artistic activism works so well — there are just certain things about our feelings and emotions that cannot be explained another way.

Anna Serbina Discussion 13

I would like to share photos of a performance “Ablutions” (1972) by Judy Chicago, Suzanne Lacy, Sandra Orgel and Aviva Rahmani. The project concerned rape and was based on the audio recordings of experiences of women who had been raped. Here is the description of the performance that I took from Lacy’s website:

Three body-sized galvanized metal tubs on the concrete floor were each filled with a different substance—eggs, blood, and clay. Around the tubs broken eggshells, piles of rope and chain, and animal kidneys were strewn. The soundtrack played continuously, one woman after the other telling the intimate and explicit details of their rapes—information not part of public culture at that time. A nude woman was slowly bound from feet to scalp with gauze bandages while two others bathed in the tubs, first eggs, then blood, then clay. As each one emerged from the final tub, caked with clay cracked to reveal rivulets of blood, and was wrapped like a corpse in a sheet. Throughout the performance, Lacy nailed 50 beef kidneys to the wall, encasing the room like a spinal column sur- rounded by its organs. The performance ended with two women—Lacy and Jan Lester, the bandager—stringing light rope over the set, until the performance stage was a spider web of entrapment. The voices on the tape droned on as if there was no escape from the brutalization, ending with the audio tape stuck on a chilling note, repeating like a broken record: “I felt so helpless, all I could do was just lie there.” 

I chose it after seeing one of Judy Chicago’s paintings in an art museum and looking up her other works. The amount of work behind this performance and how “graphic” it is drew my attention. I view it as activism because it drew attention to a really big problem, considering the fact that marital rape was not criminalized in all states until the 90s. This performance could also inspire other women to speak up, following the example of the performers and recorded women.

Anna Serbina Reflection 11

This week’s materials at some point felt hard to continue reading because of the amount of humiliation it described. Not that I did not know about transphobia in the health field, but to immerse myself in the personal experiences was quite powerful. The article “12 reasons it should be illegal for doctors not to treat a trans person” shares messages from people who stand against the proposed law that would allow denying medical care to transgender people. Many of them have faced discrimination based on their gender personally, while some were speaking for others. I cannot point a specific quote out of it – they all seem equally sad to me.

While reading “A Birth Story,” I once again thought of how obscure oppression can be. The article illustrates one of the many examples of obstetric racism, which impacts a patient’s medical treatment or diagnostic decisions based on their race. It can be taken as medical negligence that has nothing to do with racism, but the article shares a statistic that proves the opposite: “Black Women are more likely to have C-sections than any other group of women, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.” One quote from the story that made me emotional is this: “No wheelchair was provided and she had to walk to another room, pushing her newborn in the mobile crib and her IV…” On top of being exhausted and perhaps traumatized by her difficult labor, and on top of all sorts of emotions that postpartum brings, LeConté had to also bear this humiliating experience and I can’t imagine how painful it was for her.

Not only the readings, but the film “Period. End of Sentence” made me emotional in many ways. In the beginning, when both men and women are asked about periods, no one seems to have a willingness to answer or actual knowledge about it. One of the comments under the film on YouTube states that it “Broke my heart when those boys called periods a disease,” and I can totally relate. But later on, when I saw men, who are husbands and relatives of interviewed women, joining the pad production, I also got too emotional in a happy way. The documentary also served me as a reminder of how precious my life is, after seeing those women finding so much joy in things that are ordinary to me (like pads or having a routine job).

Anna Serbina Discussion 12

The format of this week’s readings and the film is much more personal and less “academic,” yet it does not make the intended message unclear. The pathos in them creates a stronger sense of a problem because you can have a visual example of a real individual’s experience. As a result, it’s not perceived as something theoretical or complicated or rare, but as an existing issue that affects people. I don’t think I’ve ever experienced medical oppression and I am new to this whole discussion; as an immigrant, I also have a distorted view of the US medical system (as the highest standard one), so it was surprising to learn that there is so much discrimination and general negligence existing within it. I cannot wrap it around my head because it sounds bizarre and pointless to deny [proper] medical care to anyone at all. The job of medical professionals is to take care of human bodies, that all function the same way on a basic level, so why would any features of these bodies matter at all? 

It wasn’t as surprising to see the stigma surrounding periods in the film “Period: End of Sentence”, because I was somewhat exposed to it in my younger years. The treatment of periods in India reminded me of Jewish culture as well, which I learned about from my stepdad. A lot of his religious relatives have a separate room in their house for the wives to sleep in when they’re on their period. To explain this, I’ll quote an article “Jewish Women Open Up About Getting Their Periods” by Aimee Rubensteen that I found on the web:

The Torah states that a woman becomes ritually impure (teme’ah) when she has her period, and it’s interpreted from the Torah verses that a woman can’t have sex with her husband during this time. When her period ends, she regains her spiritually pure status (taharah) by immersing in a ritual bath (mikvah).

The period poverty and stigma is very common in the world and directly deals with patriarchy as well, which is addressed in the film. One of the interviewed women said, “When there’s patriarchy, it takes time to talk about something related to women.” Similarly, in a world where other kinds of oppression exist, it takes time to talk about the oppressed groups’ obstacles. In both of the readings, we see how racism and transphobia prevent individuals from being treated as humans in medical institutions, and apparently, it has not seen an improvement. Though it is not apparent, the film connects with the readings by showing how much social systems affect personal health of people, which also reminds me of “Personal Is Political” slogan.

Anna Serbina Reflection 10

While reading “The Power of Identity Politics” by Alicia Garza, I felt like I’m having a therapy session with my own beliefs. They were challenged. This text unpacks the concept of identity politics. To start, the writer uses an image of a young woman that they overheard in the bar, who also happened to be white and blonde. The woman felt irritated by the frequency with which race was mentioned everywhere. She believed it was dividing people even more. As a young white blonde woman, I admit that I can relate to her a lot — I often have the inner monologue of “I wish we just didn’t have the concept of race at all.” That’s why I’m grateful for this piece of writing. Such a view of mine came from not understanding how my privilege functions. As Williams states, “power prefers to operate in obscurity.” That is to say, we are hesitant to acknowledge the differences between the quality of life of certain race groups because privilege exists when it is ignored. One part that helped me understand the whole dilemma is this: “If white people had not enacted a system of enslavement where Black people from the Caribbean, Africa, and Latin America were stolen and forced into subjugation for generations, would we be having this conversation?” It’s like a trap or a loop that white people put themselves into long ago. And despite their desire to let go of history and just move on, we cannot and should not. As I read about why I couldn’t help but compare it to the struggles of my homeland. “The willful forgetting of traumatic experiences allows their harmful effects to continue.” There were two man-made famines in Ukraine, aimed for both humiliation, genocide, and profit. There were generally a lot of things happening to erase Ukrainian culture and history as if it never existed. It was so traumatic that many survivors of the famine have never spoken a word of it. They all pretended that it never happened. Because this and many other historic events that were forgotten until recently, an image of brother nations have established, leading to the further assimilation of Ukrainians. Apparently, the same thing is asked of Black people – to move on, forget, and expect that the historic oppression would never happen again. But as we see, it certainly can happen.

That’s why identity politics should not be suppressed – they raise awareness of diverse cultures that deserve to exist and to be different. We can observe it in the second reading by Aleichia Williams, who struggles to put herself in one category – she is both African-American and Latina. Her writing reminded me of myself — born in one country, speaking a language of the second country, and being moved to the third country as a teen. Who am I? I was influenced by 3 different cultures and they all found a way to coexist inside of me. I’m speaking not only for myself but for many other immigrants and/or people of mixed origins. Williams’s words echoed in my heart: “just because I don’t fit into one specific mold or the other doesn’t mean I’m any less of who I am.”

Anna Serbina Discussion 11

This week’s readings have made identity politics and its importance very clear to me. I can define it as basing your agenda on very specific personal experiences, rather than a part of your experiences that also belong to someone else. To take Aleichia Williams as an example, she is not just Black. She is not just Latina. She owns both titles equally and perhaps many others, such as “woman,” “activist,” “writer,” and so on. They create her identity, but also pose disadvantages, unique to her. In opposition to a popular belief that identity politics divide society even more, I would say it can do the opposite. Identity politics show that we all are different, yet we are all human and live in the same world; it also allows people to understand the suffering of others better and creates a sense of urgency to fix the suffering. To hear a sad story about a broad community of thousands of people is not usually as convincing as to hear a story about a specific person. It’s more striking and emotional. And thus produces faster results on both ends: those who tell the story act more eager; those who listen are more willing to do it.

“Power of Identity Politics” by Alicia Garza focuses a lot on power and what it has to do with identity politics. Those who have power can cultivate oppression, but only if it’s done invisibly, behind the curtain. Garza explains that “so-called identity politics tries to make that invisible power seen,” and that’s where its necessity lies (187).
This reading fixed my misconception that the concept is new and applies only to “focusing on our own oppression.” Identity politics are also about acknowledging differences such as race, calling them by their names, noticing the unequal power within them, and not trying to blend in with someone else’s identity. I realized that identity politics is the name for a type of activism that I’m seeing everywhere and every day but just didn’t know how to call it.

I would love to learn more about gender in the context of children and parenting, as well as some stories from recent years concerning gender roles and how it has been changing through times and cultures.