I’m going to be honest I didn’t get to read the other two complete readings because since I started this one aroused a lot of interest in me was “The male paradox”. This is because Jackson, who is the author, is in charge of showing us everything about the porn business. I learned something new which was that I didn’t know that porn didn’t start with men and women, but with men for men. It is mentioned
“The idea that consumers of porn can masturbate and have orgasms with that kind of treatment of women and that it doesn’t affect their attitudes towards women… in their lives is more of a fantasy than anything the most creative porn writers can conjure” (186, Jackson). This shows how, according to the creators of this content, they say that the viewers only watch porn to satisfy themselves personally and that, for example, if a man watches porn of both sexes, this will not affect his way of seeing women and how to treat her in real life. . It’s true, from what I’ve heard why I shouldn’t say this here but before I used to listen when my cousins talked about it and they themselves said things like “I see them when I get horny but I know that all that is acted”. However, for consumers who do not know that this is not real, it influences them because they create a movie in their head and all of this in one way or another is reflected with women.
Merichel Almonte, Reflexion 6
Leave a reply