1. The dual court system is uniquely crafted to protect individual rights more effectively than other branches with election systems like Congress, the President, and local governments. The dual court system comprises both state and federal courts, both working independently but at times overlapping. This specific structure allows for individuals to have multiple paths on the journey of seeking justice, if an individual feels as though their rights were violated by state law, they have the opportunity of appealing their case higher in the state court system–and potentially to federal courts if a federal constitutional issue arises. Ultimately, this layered system allows for the highest chance of individual rights protection.
  2. Before reading the articles, the Supreme Court can easily be seen as anti-democratic due to it being the only system within our government’s structure where citizens aren’t involved in the selection. However, it was clarified that this selection method is intentional as it allows for the federal court to be removed from political pressures, thus making it easier for judges to make decisions solely on the constitution and law, not on what people believe is just/politically convenient.This reasoning helps me believe that the Supreme court isn’t solely anti-democratic, however, practices like court packing and other political influences can still sway justices decisions, undermining the intended impartiality of the court and reinforcing the perception that theres a possible undemocratic manner.

Leave a Reply